by Hayek
[Front Matter and Table of Contents]: Title page, publication details, and table of contents for Hayek's 1939 collection of essays. It lists the primary essay on profits and investment alongside previously published works on capital maintenance, price expectations, and the history of the doctrine of forced saving. [Preface]: Hayek introduces the volume as a development of his earlier theories on industrial fluctuations. He notes that the lead essay is a revised version of the argument in 'Prices and Production', treated from a different angle, and explains his reasons for selecting or omitting certain earlier works, including his critique of Keynes. [Profits, Interest and Investment: Introduction]: Hayek begins his restatement of the theory of crises, emphasizing that the rate of profit, rather than the rate of interest, is the dominating factor in industrial fluctuations. He acknowledges a need to distinguish more clearly between money wages and real wages and states his intention to incorporate more realistic assumptions, such as the existence of unemployed resources and wage rigidity. [The Ricardo Effect]: Hayek explains the 'Ricardo Effect', which posits that a rise in prices (or fall in real wages) increases the rate of profit on short-term investments more than on long-term investments. This creates a tendency for capitalists to substitute direct labour for machinery, leading to less capital-intensive methods of production. [The Ricardo Effect in the Boom and the Rate of Profit]: Hayek applies the Ricardo Effect to the later stages of an economic boom. He argues that rising consumer prices and falling real wages shift demand away from labor-saving machinery toward more direct labor. He distinguishes between the general profit schedule and the marginal rate of profit, arguing that a constant interest rate cannot prevent this shift in the structure of production. [Expectations and the Acceleration Principle]: This section examines the role of entrepreneurial expectations and critiques the 'acceleration principle'. Hayek argues that the 'multiplier' (the ratio of final demand to capital demand) is not constant but decreases when real wages fall, as firms shift to less capital-intensive methods. This can lead to a decrease in the demand for capital goods even if final consumer demand is increasing. [The Structure of Capitalistic Production]: Hayek rejects the simple dichotomy of consumer vs. capital goods, proposing a vertical hierarchy of production stages. He explains that many industries are specific to 'early' stages (far from consumption) and that their employment depends on the continued adoption of highly capitalistic (labour-saving) methods by other industries. [The Decline of Investment and the Role of Raw Materials]: Hayek describes how the boom collapses as the Ricardo Effect spreads through the stages of production. Rising raw material prices further squeeze the profitability of capital goods industries. He concludes that a 'scarcity of capital' (insufficient consumer goods to sustain long-term investment) eventually forces a decline in investment, regardless of whether interest rates rise, effectively inverting the acceleration principle into a 'deceleration principle'. [Factors Governing the Revival of Investment]: Hayek examines the early stages of economic recovery, characterized by high unemployment and low profits. He argues that high real wages initially drive 'capitalistic' or 'deepening' investment—introducing labor-saving machinery—rather than increasing final output. He critiques Keynes and Kaldor regarding capital consumption and the definition of boom and depression. The section distinguishes between the 'deepening' and 'widening' of capital, noting that the acceleration principle operates with a high multiplier during the revival phase before prices and profits begin to rise. [The Limits of Expansion and Inflationary Incomes]: This section explores the limits of expansion without triggering price rises. Hayek argues that increasing money incomes to employ idle resources is not inherently inflationary if it matches the potential supply of consumers' goods. He references Mises to show that 'Austrian' theory accounts for unemployed resources. He distinguishes between three stages of saving/investment based on resource availability and defines 'neutral money' in the context of a growing population, correcting his own previous stance in 'Prices and Production'. [Investment Forms and the Rate of Contribution to Consumption]: Hayek introduces the concept of the 'Quotient' (Q), which is the inverse of the acceleration principle's multiplier. Q represents the rate at which new investment contributes to the flow of consumers' goods. He argues that more 'capitalistic' (roundabout) investments have a lower Q, meaning they generate income quickly but increase the supply of goods slowly. This creates a lag that can lead to a rise in profits if net investment exceeds net saving. He emphasizes that only net investment creates the specific problem of balancing income with the supply of consumers' goods. [The Cumulative Process and the Ceiling of Stable Employment]: Hayek describes the 'cumulative process' where rising demand for consumers' goods paradoxically stimulates more investment, leading to an inherently unstable 'explosive' process. He argues that there is a 'short run ceiling' of stable employment determined by the initial rate of profit and the rate of saving. Full employment may be unattainable or unstable if the distribution of labor between capital goods and consumers' goods industries is mismatched—a legacy of previous booms. He provides statistical illustrations of unemployment disparities across different industrial sectors. [Mitigating Fluctuations and the Role of Interest Rates]: Hayek discusses policy measures to mitigate industrial fluctuations, suggesting that preventing profits from falling too low in depressions and wages from rising too high in booms is key. He critiques the 'desperado' policy of achieving full employment through monetary expansion. He argues that while the rate of interest often fails to guide investment effectively because it lags behind the rate of profit, it should be used more promptly to offset profit changes. He concludes with a metaphor of steering a car to describe the necessity of frequent, small adjustments to interest rates to maintain stability. [Investment That Raises the Demand for Capital]: This introductory section of a reprinted essay addresses the 'monetary over-investment theories' of the trade cycle. Hayek identifies a central confusion in economic dynamics: the ambiguity of the term 'capital'. He argues that the static proposition—that an increase in the quantity of capital necessarily lowers the rate of interest—is often erroneously applied to dynamic situations involving capital goods. He intends to clarify how certain types of investment can actually increase the demand for capital. [The Relative Significance of the Amount of Investment and of the Form that it takes]: Hayek challenges the static assumption that an increase in capital goods necessarily lowers interest rates. He argues that the future demand for investible funds depends on the specific form current investment takes, particularly when investments are links in a chain requiring further 'completing' investments. If initial investments are specific and irrevocably committed, they can create a highly inelastic demand for further capital, potentially driving interest rates up rather than down to ensure the completion of the production process. [Completing Investments and the Rate of Interest]: This section examines how the demand for capital at any moment is determined by the ratio of completed to uncompleted parts of the capital structure. Using a schematic example, Hayek demonstrates that once a process like a hydro-electric plant is started, the demand for completing funds (e.g., for electric motors) becomes highly inelastic. Even a significant rise in interest rates may not curtail this demand because the sunk costs of the earlier stages act as a premium for the final stages. He also addresses the role of amortization and replacement, noting that reduced earnings in earlier stages can actually decrease the supply of investible funds, further raising interest rates. [Causes of an Urgent Demand for Funds for Completing Investments]: Hayek identifies credit expansion as the primary cause of false expectations that lead to an urgent demand for completing investments. When credit is expanded at an unsustainable rate, it induces entrepreneurs to invest in forms that require future capital at similar rates. If the actual supply of funds falls short, the resulting competition for capital drives interest rates up. Hayek argues that the 'marginal efficiency of capital' is not a simple decreasing function of capital quantity and that a purely monetary analysis of the trade cycle is insufficient without considering the concrete real structure of production. [The Maintenance of Capital: The Nature and Significance of the Problem]: Hayek introduces the problem of defining a 'constant amount of capital' in a dynamic economy. He critiques the common assumption of a perfectly mobile capital fund that maintains its value while changing form. He argues that in a world of changing prices and demand, the physical and value composition of capital is in constant flux. The section highlights the difficulty of defining income, savings, and depreciation without a clear concept of what it means to keep capital intact, a failure he attributes to both trade cycle theorists and income theorists. [The Maintenance of Capital: Critical Review of Professor Pigou's Treatment]: Hayek provides a detailed critique of A.C. Pigou's evolving definitions of maintaining capital. Pigou moved from a value-based definition (corrected by price indices) to one based on physical maintenance, excluding value losses from changes in demand, inventions, or 'acts of God.' Hayek argues that Pigou's exclusion of obsolescence—even when foreseen—is problematic, as it could allow capital to be squandered on durable structures for transient purposes without being considered a decrease in capital. He suggests that the distinction must instead be based on whether changes are foreseen. [The Rationale of Maintaining Capital Intact and the Action of the Capitalist with Perfect Foresight]: Hayek argues that 'maintaining capital intact' is not an end in itself but a means to maintain a constant income stream. Using the assumption of perfect foresight, he analyzes how a capitalist must redistribute amortization quotas when demand shifts. He identifies three types of reactions to anticipated changes in interest rates and productivity. He concludes that to maintain a constant income, a capitalist must adjust consumption immediately upon learning of a future change, rather than maintaining a constant money value of capital, which would lead to sudden jumps in future income. [Obsolescence, Anticipated Risks, and Unforeseen Changes]: Hayek discusses obsolescence and risk as factors in capital maintenance. He argues that obsolescence must be treated like physical depreciation; if an instrument's economic life is shorter than its physical life, gross returns must cover full amortization within that shorter period to maintain income. In the case of unforeseen changes, Hayek distinguishes between 'income' and 'windfall' gains or losses. To maintain capital intact after an unexpected loss, only the interest on the remaining capital should be counted as income; trying to recover the original capital value through reduced consumption constitutes new saving, not maintenance. [The Impossibility of an Objective Standard and the Role of the Entrepreneur]: Hayek asserts that there is no objective standard for maintaining capital because it depends entirely on the subjective foresight of entrepreneurs. The amount of capital available to society is determined more by correct forecasting than by time preference or current saving. He explains that capital is often 'newly formed' through the capitalization of windfall profits by successful entrepreneurs, which replaces capital lost by others. This process of redistribution and maintenance means that 'net' changes in capital are often indeterminate and the traditional distinction between saving and investment is of limited value in a dynamic world. [Saving and Investing in a Dynamic Context]: Hayek argues for abandoning the concepts of saving and investment as absolute magnitudes. Instead, he proposes a direct comparison between the intentions of consumers regarding their future income stream and the intentions of producers. Disturbances occur when monetary factors (like credit expansion) cause the price of future income sources to diverge from consumer valuations. He suggests that 'savings' correspond to 'investment' only when the value of existing capital goods makes it profitable to replace them with the specific goods needed to meet consumer demand at expected prices. [Capital Accounting and Monetary Policy]: Hayek examines how actual business accounting, which treats capital as a money fund, interacts with monetary policy. He argues that policies aiming to stabilize prices during periods of increasing productivity create 'paper profits.' If these nominal gains (including Stock Exchange appreciation) are consumed as income, it leads to capital destruction because the money value of capital must rise in proportion to real income to maintain the same income stream. Such booms are unsustainable because they rely on continuous credit expansion to maintain the inflated capital values that people are attempting to 'realize' as consumption. [Price Expectations, Monetary Disturbances and Malinvestments: Introduction]: Hayek introduces an essay on the application of equilibrium theory to dynamic phenomena like industrial fluctuations. He categorizes past approaches into three groups: those with little theoretical knowledge, those who found theory useless for reality, and those who applied simplified theories prematurely. He argues that modern equilibrium analysis must be developed to bridge the gap between statics and dynamics by incorporating time and the role of expectations. [Equilibrium, Foresight, and Entrepreneurial Error]: Hayek redefines equilibrium in a competitive system as a state where the expectations of different individuals are mutually compatible. Crises occur when entrepreneurs simultaneously make errors in the same direction, often because they are misled by the price system. He distinguishes between 'justified errors' caused by misleading price signals and 'sheer errors' regarding external events. This framework provides a basis for understanding how current prices can create expectations that are 'doomed to disappointment.' [The Capital Market and Monetary Distortion]: Hayek explains how monetary disturbances distort the capital market. When credit expansion increases the supply of money capital beyond actual savings, the rate of interest falls below the equilibrium rate. This misleads entrepreneurs into starting long-term investment processes that the consumers' actual saving behavior cannot support. As these new investments increase money incomes, the demand for consumers' goods rises, eventually leading to a conflict between the intentions of consumers and the investment plans of entrepreneurs. [Scarcity of Capital and the Crisis]: Hayek discusses the 'scarcity of capital' as the central cause of crises. He revives 19th-century theories (Wilson, Guyot) suggesting that crises are caused by over-consumption and the excessive conversion of circulating capital into fixed capital. When the demand for consumers' goods rises relatively to the funds available for investment, new processes cannot be completed, and existing capital equipment stands idle. He argues that the abundance of capital goods during a crisis is actually a symptom of a shortage of the 'free capital' (subsistence) needed to utilize them. [Restating the Theory of Industrial Fluctuations]: Hayek restates the Wicksell-Mises theory of cycles without relying on absolute measures of capital. The core issue is the lack of correspondence between consumer intentions and entrepreneurial decisions. He acknowledges the role of expectations and uncertainty, agreeing with Myrdal and other Scandinavian economists on their importance. He concludes that while his theory has been criticized for ignoring expectations, they are in fact central to explaining how price changes lead to malinvestment. [Saving: Definition and Conceptual Evolution]: In this reprint of an article for the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Hayek defines saving as the postponement of consumption. He distinguishes between saving in natura, saving in a money economy (which can lead to hoarding), and investment. He notes that in a social sense, saving is the primary cause of capital formation. He introduces a classification of the sources of capital supply, citing Wilhelm Röpke, to clarify the different activities often loosely grouped under the term 'saving.' [Classification of Saving and Capital Formation]: Hayek expands on Professor Röpke's classification of saving, distinguishing between voluntary individual saving, corporate reinvestment, collective saving via taxation, and monetary forced saving. He discusses the theoretical difficulties in distinguishing between net and gross saving, particularly the challenge of defining what it means to maintain capital intact under conditions of technical progress. [Historical Evolution of Saving and Investment]: A historical overview of saving practices, noting that the regular investment of savings is a relatively modern phenomenon. Hayek describes the transition from hoarding precious metals to the development of modern capital markets and banking institutions during the 19th century, which eventually separated the roles of the saver and the entrepreneur-investor. [Modern Saving Institutions and the Deflationary Risk of Hoarding]: Analysis of modern specialized saving institutions like life insurance and building societies. Hayek examines the monetary implications of bank deposits, arguing that if savings are left unused in banks without corresponding credit creation for investment, the effect is equivalent to hoarding and carries deflationary consequences. [The Economic Effects of Investment and the Fallacy of Over-Saving]: Hayek explains how investment lengthens the production process and reduces unit costs. He refutes 'under-consumption' and 'over-saving' theories of depression, arguing that crises are typically caused by over-investment (relative to available capital) or forced saving through credit expansion rather than an absolute excess of saving. He critiques the idea that individuals can save 'too much' from a social utility standpoint. [Stability in a Dynamic Economy and the Capacity to Save]: Discussion on how a high rate of voluntary saving acts as a safeguard of stability in dynamic economies with growing populations and advancing technology. Hayek also analyzes the factors affecting the willingness and capacity to save, noting that social insurance may decrease aggregate savings and that the supply of savings is more sensitive to income levels and distribution than to interest rate changes. [The Present State and Immediate Prospects of the Study of Industrial Fluctuations]: Hayek reviews the progress of trade cycle theory (Konjunkturforschung), noting a growing agreement among economists like Spiethoff, Wicksell, and Mises regarding the role of credit expansion and capital scarcity. He critiques the 'naïve' monetary view that price level stabilization alone can prevent fluctuations and identifies the need for a more developed theory of capital dynamics. [Secondary Complications of Depression and Liquidation]: The essay addresses the less understood stages of depression and economic liquidation. Hayek discusses the role of price and wage rigidities in causing 'secondary deflation' and emphasizes the need for a theoretical fusion of capital theory, monetary velocity, and intertemporal exchange relationships to understand these processes. [Credit Expansion in Recovery and Progressive Societies]: Hayek examines the mechanism of re-absorbing unemployed resources at the end of a depression. He analyzes the effects of credit expansion in a progressive society, suggesting that high rates of voluntary saving can mitigate the crises typically caused by forced saving and credit expansion by providing a real basis for capital created during booms. [A Note on the Development of the Doctrine of 'Forced Saving']: A historical tracing of the concept of 'forced saving' (or 'forced frugality'). Hayek identifies Jeremy Bentham as the earliest and clearest source of the theory, followed by Henry Thornton, Malthus, Dugald Stewart, and J.S. Mill. He shows how the doctrine passed from Walras to Wicksell and eventually into modern trade cycle theory, including its variations in the Cambridge School. [The 'Paradox' of Saving: Introduction and Context]: Hayek introduces a detailed critique of the under-consumption theories of Foster and Catchings. He describes the background of the Pollak Foundation and the popularization of the idea that saving renders consumer purchasing power insufficient to buy back industrial output, leading to trade depressions. [The Foster and Catchings Theory of Under-Consumption]: An exposition of the 'Dilemma of Thrift' as proposed by Foster and Catchings. The theory argues that when corporations or individuals save and invest in capital facilities, they increase supply without a corresponding increase in consumer money, leading to unsold goods and crises. Hayek outlines their argument that falling prices cannot solve this because they destroy the incentive to produce. [Critique of the Pollak Prize Essays and Proposed Reforms]: Hayek reviews the results of the Foster and Catchings prize competition, noting that most critics failed to address the fundamental theoretical error. He describes the authors' policy proposals, including the creation of a 'Federal Budget Board' to finance consumption through government borrowing and bank credit expansion during downturns. [The Fundamental Flaw: Capital and Roundabout Production]: Hayek identifies the core error in the under-consumptionist position: the failure to understand that saving and investment involve a transition to more 'roundabout' (capital-intensive) methods of production. He uses schematic models (Schemes A and B) to show that in a multi-stage economy, the money spent on production goods is naturally several times larger than the money spent on consumption goods, and that saving lengthens this process without necessarily creating a deficit in purchasing power. [Investment in Fixed vs. Circulating Capital]: A technical analysis of how new savings are absorbed into fixed and circulating capital. Hayek argues that attempts to stabilize the price level through monetary expansion when productivity increases lead to a dissipation of savings and unsustainable extensions of the production process. He explains that the fall in product prices is a necessary result of more productive, capital-intensive methods. [Vertical Integration and the Function of Saving]: Hayek addresses the specific case of vertically integrated firms used in Foster and Catchings' examples. He argues that even here, saving requires a temporary reduction in consumption to bridge the time required for longer production processes. He concludes that 'over-production' is a myth; crises arise only when the structure of production is distorted by temporary credit expansions that cannot be maintained. [Conclusion: The Dangers of Financing Consumption]: The final section critiques the proposal to 'finance consumption' to prevent price falls. Hayek uses Schemes C, D, and E to demonstrate that injecting money on the consumption side causes a shortening of the production process (capital consumption) and aggravates industrial fluctuations. He concludes that such policies effectively punish capital creation and frustrate the purpose of saving. [Index of Authors Cited]: An alphabetical index of authors cited throughout the work, including major figures such as Bentham, Foster, Catchings, Keynes, Malthus, Mill, Pigou, Ricardo, and Wicksell.
Title page, publication details, and table of contents for Hayek's 1939 collection of essays. It lists the primary essay on profits and investment alongside previously published works on capital maintenance, price expectations, and the history of the doctrine of forced saving.
Read full textHayek introduces the volume as a development of his earlier theories on industrial fluctuations. He notes that the lead essay is a revised version of the argument in 'Prices and Production', treated from a different angle, and explains his reasons for selecting or omitting certain earlier works, including his critique of Keynes.
Read full textHayek begins his restatement of the theory of crises, emphasizing that the rate of profit, rather than the rate of interest, is the dominating factor in industrial fluctuations. He acknowledges a need to distinguish more clearly between money wages and real wages and states his intention to incorporate more realistic assumptions, such as the existence of unemployed resources and wage rigidity.
Read full textHayek explains the 'Ricardo Effect', which posits that a rise in prices (or fall in real wages) increases the rate of profit on short-term investments more than on long-term investments. This creates a tendency for capitalists to substitute direct labour for machinery, leading to less capital-intensive methods of production.
Read full textHayek applies the Ricardo Effect to the later stages of an economic boom. He argues that rising consumer prices and falling real wages shift demand away from labor-saving machinery toward more direct labor. He distinguishes between the general profit schedule and the marginal rate of profit, arguing that a constant interest rate cannot prevent this shift in the structure of production.
Read full textThis section examines the role of entrepreneurial expectations and critiques the 'acceleration principle'. Hayek argues that the 'multiplier' (the ratio of final demand to capital demand) is not constant but decreases when real wages fall, as firms shift to less capital-intensive methods. This can lead to a decrease in the demand for capital goods even if final consumer demand is increasing.
Read full textHayek rejects the simple dichotomy of consumer vs. capital goods, proposing a vertical hierarchy of production stages. He explains that many industries are specific to 'early' stages (far from consumption) and that their employment depends on the continued adoption of highly capitalistic (labour-saving) methods by other industries.
Read full textHayek describes how the boom collapses as the Ricardo Effect spreads through the stages of production. Rising raw material prices further squeeze the profitability of capital goods industries. He concludes that a 'scarcity of capital' (insufficient consumer goods to sustain long-term investment) eventually forces a decline in investment, regardless of whether interest rates rise, effectively inverting the acceleration principle into a 'deceleration principle'.
Read full textHayek examines the early stages of economic recovery, characterized by high unemployment and low profits. He argues that high real wages initially drive 'capitalistic' or 'deepening' investment—introducing labor-saving machinery—rather than increasing final output. He critiques Keynes and Kaldor regarding capital consumption and the definition of boom and depression. The section distinguishes between the 'deepening' and 'widening' of capital, noting that the acceleration principle operates with a high multiplier during the revival phase before prices and profits begin to rise.
Read full textThis section explores the limits of expansion without triggering price rises. Hayek argues that increasing money incomes to employ idle resources is not inherently inflationary if it matches the potential supply of consumers' goods. He references Mises to show that 'Austrian' theory accounts for unemployed resources. He distinguishes between three stages of saving/investment based on resource availability and defines 'neutral money' in the context of a growing population, correcting his own previous stance in 'Prices and Production'.
Read full textHayek introduces the concept of the 'Quotient' (Q), which is the inverse of the acceleration principle's multiplier. Q represents the rate at which new investment contributes to the flow of consumers' goods. He argues that more 'capitalistic' (roundabout) investments have a lower Q, meaning they generate income quickly but increase the supply of goods slowly. This creates a lag that can lead to a rise in profits if net investment exceeds net saving. He emphasizes that only net investment creates the specific problem of balancing income with the supply of consumers' goods.
Read full textHayek describes the 'cumulative process' where rising demand for consumers' goods paradoxically stimulates more investment, leading to an inherently unstable 'explosive' process. He argues that there is a 'short run ceiling' of stable employment determined by the initial rate of profit and the rate of saving. Full employment may be unattainable or unstable if the distribution of labor between capital goods and consumers' goods industries is mismatched—a legacy of previous booms. He provides statistical illustrations of unemployment disparities across different industrial sectors.
Read full textHayek discusses policy measures to mitigate industrial fluctuations, suggesting that preventing profits from falling too low in depressions and wages from rising too high in booms is key. He critiques the 'desperado' policy of achieving full employment through monetary expansion. He argues that while the rate of interest often fails to guide investment effectively because it lags behind the rate of profit, it should be used more promptly to offset profit changes. He concludes with a metaphor of steering a car to describe the necessity of frequent, small adjustments to interest rates to maintain stability.
Read full textThis introductory section of a reprinted essay addresses the 'monetary over-investment theories' of the trade cycle. Hayek identifies a central confusion in economic dynamics: the ambiguity of the term 'capital'. He argues that the static proposition—that an increase in the quantity of capital necessarily lowers the rate of interest—is often erroneously applied to dynamic situations involving capital goods. He intends to clarify how certain types of investment can actually increase the demand for capital.
Read full textHayek challenges the static assumption that an increase in capital goods necessarily lowers interest rates. He argues that the future demand for investible funds depends on the specific form current investment takes, particularly when investments are links in a chain requiring further 'completing' investments. If initial investments are specific and irrevocably committed, they can create a highly inelastic demand for further capital, potentially driving interest rates up rather than down to ensure the completion of the production process.
Read full textThis section examines how the demand for capital at any moment is determined by the ratio of completed to uncompleted parts of the capital structure. Using a schematic example, Hayek demonstrates that once a process like a hydro-electric plant is started, the demand for completing funds (e.g., for electric motors) becomes highly inelastic. Even a significant rise in interest rates may not curtail this demand because the sunk costs of the earlier stages act as a premium for the final stages. He also addresses the role of amortization and replacement, noting that reduced earnings in earlier stages can actually decrease the supply of investible funds, further raising interest rates.
Read full textHayek identifies credit expansion as the primary cause of false expectations that lead to an urgent demand for completing investments. When credit is expanded at an unsustainable rate, it induces entrepreneurs to invest in forms that require future capital at similar rates. If the actual supply of funds falls short, the resulting competition for capital drives interest rates up. Hayek argues that the 'marginal efficiency of capital' is not a simple decreasing function of capital quantity and that a purely monetary analysis of the trade cycle is insufficient without considering the concrete real structure of production.
Read full textHayek introduces the problem of defining a 'constant amount of capital' in a dynamic economy. He critiques the common assumption of a perfectly mobile capital fund that maintains its value while changing form. He argues that in a world of changing prices and demand, the physical and value composition of capital is in constant flux. The section highlights the difficulty of defining income, savings, and depreciation without a clear concept of what it means to keep capital intact, a failure he attributes to both trade cycle theorists and income theorists.
Read full textHayek provides a detailed critique of A.C. Pigou's evolving definitions of maintaining capital. Pigou moved from a value-based definition (corrected by price indices) to one based on physical maintenance, excluding value losses from changes in demand, inventions, or 'acts of God.' Hayek argues that Pigou's exclusion of obsolescence—even when foreseen—is problematic, as it could allow capital to be squandered on durable structures for transient purposes without being considered a decrease in capital. He suggests that the distinction must instead be based on whether changes are foreseen.
Read full textHayek argues that 'maintaining capital intact' is not an end in itself but a means to maintain a constant income stream. Using the assumption of perfect foresight, he analyzes how a capitalist must redistribute amortization quotas when demand shifts. He identifies three types of reactions to anticipated changes in interest rates and productivity. He concludes that to maintain a constant income, a capitalist must adjust consumption immediately upon learning of a future change, rather than maintaining a constant money value of capital, which would lead to sudden jumps in future income.
Read full textHayek discusses obsolescence and risk as factors in capital maintenance. He argues that obsolescence must be treated like physical depreciation; if an instrument's economic life is shorter than its physical life, gross returns must cover full amortization within that shorter period to maintain income. In the case of unforeseen changes, Hayek distinguishes between 'income' and 'windfall' gains or losses. To maintain capital intact after an unexpected loss, only the interest on the remaining capital should be counted as income; trying to recover the original capital value through reduced consumption constitutes new saving, not maintenance.
Read full textHayek asserts that there is no objective standard for maintaining capital because it depends entirely on the subjective foresight of entrepreneurs. The amount of capital available to society is determined more by correct forecasting than by time preference or current saving. He explains that capital is often 'newly formed' through the capitalization of windfall profits by successful entrepreneurs, which replaces capital lost by others. This process of redistribution and maintenance means that 'net' changes in capital are often indeterminate and the traditional distinction between saving and investment is of limited value in a dynamic world.
Read full textHayek argues for abandoning the concepts of saving and investment as absolute magnitudes. Instead, he proposes a direct comparison between the intentions of consumers regarding their future income stream and the intentions of producers. Disturbances occur when monetary factors (like credit expansion) cause the price of future income sources to diverge from consumer valuations. He suggests that 'savings' correspond to 'investment' only when the value of existing capital goods makes it profitable to replace them with the specific goods needed to meet consumer demand at expected prices.
Read full textHayek examines how actual business accounting, which treats capital as a money fund, interacts with monetary policy. He argues that policies aiming to stabilize prices during periods of increasing productivity create 'paper profits.' If these nominal gains (including Stock Exchange appreciation) are consumed as income, it leads to capital destruction because the money value of capital must rise in proportion to real income to maintain the same income stream. Such booms are unsustainable because they rely on continuous credit expansion to maintain the inflated capital values that people are attempting to 'realize' as consumption.
Read full textHayek introduces an essay on the application of equilibrium theory to dynamic phenomena like industrial fluctuations. He categorizes past approaches into three groups: those with little theoretical knowledge, those who found theory useless for reality, and those who applied simplified theories prematurely. He argues that modern equilibrium analysis must be developed to bridge the gap between statics and dynamics by incorporating time and the role of expectations.
Read full textHayek redefines equilibrium in a competitive system as a state where the expectations of different individuals are mutually compatible. Crises occur when entrepreneurs simultaneously make errors in the same direction, often because they are misled by the price system. He distinguishes between 'justified errors' caused by misleading price signals and 'sheer errors' regarding external events. This framework provides a basis for understanding how current prices can create expectations that are 'doomed to disappointment.'
Read full textHayek explains how monetary disturbances distort the capital market. When credit expansion increases the supply of money capital beyond actual savings, the rate of interest falls below the equilibrium rate. This misleads entrepreneurs into starting long-term investment processes that the consumers' actual saving behavior cannot support. As these new investments increase money incomes, the demand for consumers' goods rises, eventually leading to a conflict between the intentions of consumers and the investment plans of entrepreneurs.
Read full textHayek discusses the 'scarcity of capital' as the central cause of crises. He revives 19th-century theories (Wilson, Guyot) suggesting that crises are caused by over-consumption and the excessive conversion of circulating capital into fixed capital. When the demand for consumers' goods rises relatively to the funds available for investment, new processes cannot be completed, and existing capital equipment stands idle. He argues that the abundance of capital goods during a crisis is actually a symptom of a shortage of the 'free capital' (subsistence) needed to utilize them.
Read full textHayek restates the Wicksell-Mises theory of cycles without relying on absolute measures of capital. The core issue is the lack of correspondence between consumer intentions and entrepreneurial decisions. He acknowledges the role of expectations and uncertainty, agreeing with Myrdal and other Scandinavian economists on their importance. He concludes that while his theory has been criticized for ignoring expectations, they are in fact central to explaining how price changes lead to malinvestment.
Read full textIn this reprint of an article for the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Hayek defines saving as the postponement of consumption. He distinguishes between saving in natura, saving in a money economy (which can lead to hoarding), and investment. He notes that in a social sense, saving is the primary cause of capital formation. He introduces a classification of the sources of capital supply, citing Wilhelm Röpke, to clarify the different activities often loosely grouped under the term 'saving.'
Read full textHayek expands on Professor Röpke's classification of saving, distinguishing between voluntary individual saving, corporate reinvestment, collective saving via taxation, and monetary forced saving. He discusses the theoretical difficulties in distinguishing between net and gross saving, particularly the challenge of defining what it means to maintain capital intact under conditions of technical progress.
Read full textA historical overview of saving practices, noting that the regular investment of savings is a relatively modern phenomenon. Hayek describes the transition from hoarding precious metals to the development of modern capital markets and banking institutions during the 19th century, which eventually separated the roles of the saver and the entrepreneur-investor.
Read full textAnalysis of modern specialized saving institutions like life insurance and building societies. Hayek examines the monetary implications of bank deposits, arguing that if savings are left unused in banks without corresponding credit creation for investment, the effect is equivalent to hoarding and carries deflationary consequences.
Read full textHayek explains how investment lengthens the production process and reduces unit costs. He refutes 'under-consumption' and 'over-saving' theories of depression, arguing that crises are typically caused by over-investment (relative to available capital) or forced saving through credit expansion rather than an absolute excess of saving. He critiques the idea that individuals can save 'too much' from a social utility standpoint.
Read full textDiscussion on how a high rate of voluntary saving acts as a safeguard of stability in dynamic economies with growing populations and advancing technology. Hayek also analyzes the factors affecting the willingness and capacity to save, noting that social insurance may decrease aggregate savings and that the supply of savings is more sensitive to income levels and distribution than to interest rate changes.
Read full textHayek reviews the progress of trade cycle theory (Konjunkturforschung), noting a growing agreement among economists like Spiethoff, Wicksell, and Mises regarding the role of credit expansion and capital scarcity. He critiques the 'naïve' monetary view that price level stabilization alone can prevent fluctuations and identifies the need for a more developed theory of capital dynamics.
Read full textThe essay addresses the less understood stages of depression and economic liquidation. Hayek discusses the role of price and wage rigidities in causing 'secondary deflation' and emphasizes the need for a theoretical fusion of capital theory, monetary velocity, and intertemporal exchange relationships to understand these processes.
Read full textHayek examines the mechanism of re-absorbing unemployed resources at the end of a depression. He analyzes the effects of credit expansion in a progressive society, suggesting that high rates of voluntary saving can mitigate the crises typically caused by forced saving and credit expansion by providing a real basis for capital created during booms.
Read full textA historical tracing of the concept of 'forced saving' (or 'forced frugality'). Hayek identifies Jeremy Bentham as the earliest and clearest source of the theory, followed by Henry Thornton, Malthus, Dugald Stewart, and J.S. Mill. He shows how the doctrine passed from Walras to Wicksell and eventually into modern trade cycle theory, including its variations in the Cambridge School.
Read full textHayek introduces a detailed critique of the under-consumption theories of Foster and Catchings. He describes the background of the Pollak Foundation and the popularization of the idea that saving renders consumer purchasing power insufficient to buy back industrial output, leading to trade depressions.
Read full textAn exposition of the 'Dilemma of Thrift' as proposed by Foster and Catchings. The theory argues that when corporations or individuals save and invest in capital facilities, they increase supply without a corresponding increase in consumer money, leading to unsold goods and crises. Hayek outlines their argument that falling prices cannot solve this because they destroy the incentive to produce.
Read full textHayek reviews the results of the Foster and Catchings prize competition, noting that most critics failed to address the fundamental theoretical error. He describes the authors' policy proposals, including the creation of a 'Federal Budget Board' to finance consumption through government borrowing and bank credit expansion during downturns.
Read full textHayek identifies the core error in the under-consumptionist position: the failure to understand that saving and investment involve a transition to more 'roundabout' (capital-intensive) methods of production. He uses schematic models (Schemes A and B) to show that in a multi-stage economy, the money spent on production goods is naturally several times larger than the money spent on consumption goods, and that saving lengthens this process without necessarily creating a deficit in purchasing power.
Read full textA technical analysis of how new savings are absorbed into fixed and circulating capital. Hayek argues that attempts to stabilize the price level through monetary expansion when productivity increases lead to a dissipation of savings and unsustainable extensions of the production process. He explains that the fall in product prices is a necessary result of more productive, capital-intensive methods.
Read full textHayek addresses the specific case of vertically integrated firms used in Foster and Catchings' examples. He argues that even here, saving requires a temporary reduction in consumption to bridge the time required for longer production processes. He concludes that 'over-production' is a myth; crises arise only when the structure of production is distorted by temporary credit expansions that cannot be maintained.
Read full textThe final section critiques the proposal to 'finance consumption' to prevent price falls. Hayek uses Schemes C, D, and E to demonstrate that injecting money on the consumption side causes a shortening of the production process (capital consumption) and aggravates industrial fluctuations. He concludes that such policies effectively punish capital creation and frustrate the purpose of saving.
Read full textAn alphabetical index of authors cited throughout the work, including major figures such as Bentham, Foster, Catchings, Keynes, Malthus, Mill, Pigou, Ricardo, and Wicksell.
Read full text