by Herkner
[Front Matter and Table of Contents]: Front matter for the second part of 'The Reorganization of German Finance' (1918), edited by Heinrich Herkner for the Verein für Sozialpolitik. It includes the title pages, publication details, and a comprehensive table of contents listing contributions on imperial tax reform, war cost coverage, tax jurisdiction, consumption taxes on middle incomes, wealth levies, and post-war municipal finances. [A Word on Imperial Finance Reform (Ein Wort zur Reichsfinanzreform)]: Gustav Cohn provides a historical and critical perspective on German imperial finance reform. He compares Germany's current war debt to the British experience after the Napoleonic Wars, arguing that public debt can accompany economic growth if managed with 'cautious wisdom' and steady repayment. Cohn criticizes the term 'Vermögensabgabe' (wealth levy) as a deceptive bureaucratic neologism for what is logically a wealth tax. He argues against 'miracle cures' or radical state-socialist projects, advocating instead for the courageous development of existing tax systems, specifically calling for the reform of inheritance, wealth, and income taxes to achieve financial justice and meet the immense requirements of the war debt. [Preliminary Questions on Future Economic Policy: Part I - National Economy and Finance]: Franz Eulenburg examines the fundamental economic shifts caused by the war that must precede any financial planning. He argues that the 'national productive forces' (a concept from Friedrich List) have been severely depleted through the consumption of capital, raw materials, and human labor. Eulenburg highlights the deceptive nature of monetary values due to inflation, noting that while nominal wealth may appear high, real productivity in agriculture and industry has declined. He provides a detailed analysis of demographic losses, the qualitative decline of the labor force, and the impact of currency instability on future state expenditures and private investment. He concludes that the primary goal of finance policy must be the restoration and rationalization of these productive forces to lower production costs and increase the national surplus. [Preliminary Questions on Future Economic Policy: Part II - Rationalization of Economic Life]: Eulenburg explores the 'Rationalization of Economic Life' as the solution to Germany's financial crisis. He advocates for a 'scientific' approach to economic management, applying principles of efficiency (Taylorism) to materials, labor, and transport. He critiques the idea of state monopolies and forced syndicates, arguing that while they offer immediate fiscal revenue, they often lead to bureaucratic inefficiency and 'stiffening' of the economy. Instead, he suggests that the state should encourage the natural selection of the most efficient enterprises and locations. He discusses the potential for energy rationalization (e.g., gas long-distance lines) and the dangers of over-regulating the middle class or retail trade, which could lead to parasitic economic structures. The section emphasizes increasing the 'economic coefficient'—the ratio of output to input—as the only sustainable way to fund the state. [Preliminary Questions on Future Economic Policy: Part III - Socio-Political Perspectives]: The final section of Eulenburg's contribution addresses the social consequences of war-induced wealth concentration and inflation. He argues that rationalization must be balanced with social justice to maintain the health and productivity of the population. Key proposals include raising the tax-free minimum to account for currency devaluation, implementing tax relief based on the number of children (family policy), and shifting the tax burden toward the 'rentier' class and luxury consumption. He warns against artificial protections for inefficient middle-class businesses, suggesting instead that social policy should focus on the individual's standard of living and health. He concludes that the two pillars of future finance must be the increase of economic performance and a social balancing of burdens. [Fundamentals of War Cost Coverage and Tax Reform]: Introductory page and table of contents for Edgar Jaffé's contribution regarding the principles of covering war costs and reforming the tax system. (Note: The full text of the essay begins in the subsequent chunk). [Table of Contents and Introduction: The Economic Impact of World War I]: This segment contains the table of contents for the work and an introduction discussing the long-term economic and financial consequences of the World War. Jaffé argues that economic stability will be more important than territorial changes and that the liquidation of war debt will occupy generations. He sets the stage for analyzing the absolute height of war expenditures for the German Empire as of late 1917. [I. War Costs and National Wealth: The Fallacy of Total Depletion]: Jaffé analyzes the relationship between war costs (estimated at 140-150 billion Marks) and German national wealth (estimated at 300-350 billion Marks). He argues that the apparent loss of half the national wealth is a fallacy because most physical assets (land, factories, mines) remain. He distinguishes between actual capital loss (destruction, raw material depletion) and internal shifts caused by war profits and inflation. He concludes that a significant portion of war debt represents 'water' or price inflation rather than a loss of physical productivity. [The 'Calculation Error' in War Economy and the Necessity of Taxation]: The author identifies a 'calculation error' where private wealth appears to have grown through war bonds while actual national assets have decreased. To prevent a catastrophic price revolution and restore the currency (Valuta), Jaffé proposes three measures: a high war profits tax (up to 80%), a general property levy (Vermögensabgabe) to align private balances with national reality, and strict price controls. He critiques the traditional resistance to property levies, arguing that in this unique post-war context, they are necessary to reduce the debt burden and incentivize renewed production. [II. The Problem of Imperial Financial Reform]: Jaffé outlines the structural challenges of reforming the German Imperial finances within a federalist system. He rejects total centralization but argues that the Empire must find new revenue sources beyond the traditional direct taxes reserved for federal states. He challenges both 'socialist' dogmas against indirect taxes and 'liberal' dogmas against production taxes. He proposes a system of 'Savings Taxes' (on luxury consumption) and 'Productivity Taxes' (Ergiebigkeitssteuern) that incentivize technical progress and efficiency through state-supervised cartels and monopolies. [III. Future Taxes as the Basis for Reconstruction]: This segment details the specific tax instruments for the post-war era. It includes one-time measures like the war profits tax and property levy, and permanent measures such as inheritance taxes (including a state 'compulsory portion'), and state monopolies on tobacco, spirits, and grain. Jaffé also advocates for increasing state revenue through the unification of railways and the creation of state monopolies for electricity and foreign trade to stabilize the Mark and manage raw material scarcity. [Finanzreform und die Notwendigkeit der Vereinheitlichung]: The author proposes a 'profitability tax' on corporate excess profits as a reserve measure and argues for a fundamental simplification of the German financial system. He critiques the historical fragmentation between Reich, state, and municipal administrations, advocating for a unified tax burden across all regions to eliminate injustices where certain areas are overburdened while others remain undertaxed. This unification is presented as a necessity to handle the immense costs of the ongoing World War and to compete with the efficient financial systems of England and the United States. [Dringlichkeit der Steuerreform und soziale Auswirkungen]: Herkner emphasizes the urgent need for immediate tax reform to address shifting income distributions and rising prices caused by the war. He criticizes the previous policy of relying solely on war loans without a plan for repayment, contrasting Germany's approach unfavorably with England's aggressive revenue increases. Furthermore, he warns that without intervention, the concentration of industry and the weakening of consumer power will lead to social unrest and the 'proletarianization' of valuable social strata. [Sozialer Neuaufbau: Mindestlöhne und Höchstpreise]: The author argues that as the state promotes industrial monopolization and syndication, it must also protect workers and consumers. He calls for the decoupling of labor from the raw mechanism of supply and demand by establishing state-mandated minimum wages and maximum prices. This 'social reconstruction' is framed as a necessary counterbalance to the loss of free competition, ensuring a dignified existence for the working class and preventing their exploitation by monopolized industries. [Die Abgrenzung der Steuergewalten (Georg Strutz)]: This section introduces a contribution by Georg Strutz regarding the division of taxing authority between the Reich and individual states. Strutz outlines a hierarchy of taxes: the Reich should primarily claim consumption and transaction taxes, while direct taxes on income and property should remain the domain of individual states. He reviews the 1913 defense levies and argues that a general property tax for the Reich is currently unjustified, suggesting an expanded inheritance tax as the only tolerable alternative for the states. [Historical Context and the Scale of Post-War Financial Challenges]: Herkner contrasts the pre-war financial situation of 1913 with the immense fiscal challenges facing the German Empire following World War I. He critiques the lack of transparency regarding war costs and argues that earlier opportunities for savings were missed. The author emphasizes that the post-war debt, interest burdens, and social welfare costs for veterans will require a massive increase in Reich revenue, far exceeding pre-war levels. [The Financial Crisis of Federal States and Municipalities]: The text examines the dire financial state of individual German states and municipalities, noting significant tax losses and increased debt due to the war. Herkner highlights the 'Raubbau' (predatory exploitation) of infrastructure like railways and public buildings, which will require massive investment to repair. He also discusses the rising costs of civil service pensions due to war-related health decline and the necessity of administrative simplification. [Redefining the Boundaries of Tax Sovereignty]: Herkner argues that the shift in financial burden toward the Reich necessitates a expansion of its tax territory at the expense of individual states. He dismisses the likelihood of significant war reparations and evaluates emergency measures like a one-time capital levy (Vermögensabgabe) or a forced loan (Zwangsanleihe). He warns that such measures, while potentially necessary, risk undermining credit and economic recovery if not carefully managed. [Principles of a Unified National Tax System]: The author advocates for an organic, unified tax system where Reich, state, and local taxes complement each other to achieve social justice. He defends indirect consumption taxes by arguing they often function as luxury taxes or are offset by direct taxes on the wealthy. He provides a detailed breakdown of the 1913 tax burden, showing the shift toward direct taxation and the role of social insurance as a form of wealth redistribution. [The Evolution of Transaction and Property Taxes]: This section analyzes the nature of transaction taxes (Verkehrssteuern) and their historical migration from state to Reich control. Herkner critiques the inconsistent classification of taxes like the 'Tantiemesteuer' and 'Talonsteuer'. He suggests that the Reich should consolidate transaction taxes while states focus on direct income and property taxes, maintaining a balance between federal unity and state autonomy. [Expansion of Consumption Taxes and State Monopolies]: Herkner proposes a significant expansion of consumption taxes on non-essential goods like tobacco, alcohol, and luxury wines. He explores the potential for state monopolies in sectors like electricity, coal, and potash to generate revenue and stabilize prices. He also discusses the possibility of import monopolies to manage currency valuation and shipping shortages, while cautioning against excessive state 'schoolmastering' of the public's consumption habits. [General Consumption and Transaction Tax Reforms]: The author evaluates various forms of general consumption taxes, including receipt stamps and turnover taxes, favoring the latter as a supplement to specific luxury taxes. He critiques Mombert's 'consumption income tax' as too intrusive. The section also covers reforms to insurance taxes and advocates for a comprehensive Reich inheritance tax, arguing that taxing estates at death is less economically damaging than high annual property taxes during a recovery period. [Inheritance Law and the Limits of State Intervention]: Herkner discusses the expansion of inheritance taxes to include direct descendants and spouses, while warning against the total abolition of testamentary freedom. He critiques proposals for a 'Reich's compulsory portion' (Pflichtteilsrecht des Reiches) as being detrimental to population growth and individual motivation. He argues that excessive state claims on estates would lead to capital flight and the consumption of wealth during the owner's lifetime. [The Debate Over a One-Time Capital Levy]: The text provides a deep analysis of the proposed one-time capital levy (Vermögensabgabe). Herkner expresses skepticism about its effectiveness in significantly reducing war debt without crippling the economy. He highlights the 'liquidity trap'—where the state owns assets it cannot easily sell—and the potential for capital flight. He argues that such a levy would disproportionately harm the middle class and disrupt the capital necessary for industrial reconstruction. [Permanent Property and Income Tax Structures]: Herkner compares a one-time levy with a permanent, moderate Reich property tax, favoring the latter for its stability. He discusses the necessity of a wealth increment tax (Vermögenszuwachssteuer) to capture war profits. Crucially, he opposes a federal Reich income tax for individuals, as it would 'mediatize' the states, but supports a unified Reich corporate tax (Gesellschaftssteuer) to simplify the taxation of large industrial enterprises across state lines. [Matricular Contributions and the Future of Federal Finance]: The final section of this chunk explores the 'refinement' of matricular contributions (state payments to the Reich). Herkner suggests using property assessments or state railway surpluses as a fairer metric for these contributions. This would allow states to remain 'masters in their own house' regarding individual income taxes while still funding the Reich. The chunk concludes with the start of a new section by Adolf Günther on the tax burden of lower-income groups. [Inhaltsverzeichnis und Einleitung zu Methodenfragen]: This segment contains the table of contents for the second part of the work and begins the first chapter on methodological questions. It discusses the validity of using averages and mean values in social statistics, referencing key theorists like von Mayr, Zizek, and von Bortkiewicz. The author emphasizes the need for caution when applying established methods to calculate the burden of consumption taxes on households. [Kritik der Lebenshaltungsforschung und Durchschnittsberechnungen]: The author critiques the assumptions of early researchers like Neumann, Gerloff, and Mombert regarding the uniformity of consumption patterns. He argues that modern life shows a great variety of realities, influenced by factors like family planning and social pressure, which makes simple average calculations problematic. The section highlights the shift from assuming rigid consumption laws to recognizing individual choice and the impact of family size on the 'food percentage' of income. [Methodische Ansätze: Intensive vs. Extensive Forschung]: This section describes the methodological shift from extensive (large-scale) to intensive (detailed individual) research in household statistics. The author explains the use of 50 specific technician households for the study, applying an individualizing method. It also discusses the concept of 'Quets' (consumption units) and how family composition affects the tax burden even within the same income level due to varying food expenditure percentages. [Belastungskoeffizienten und Steuerliche Gerechtigkeit]: The author defines 'special' and 'general' burden coefficients to measure the impact of taxes and tariffs on specific goods versus total income. He argues for comparing the burden against both total family income and the primary earner's labor income to assess fiscal justice. The section also addresses how price fluctuations can distort these coefficients, making them relative rather than absolute measures of burden. [Konsumbeeinträchtigung und Preissteigerung durch Zölle]: This segment explores whether tariffs and indirect taxes suppress consumption, particularly in poorer or larger families. It notes that taxes often lead to price increases beyond the nominal tax rate as producers and retailers adjust prices. The author also discusses the interaction between direct and indirect taxes, noting that indirect taxes can negate the progressive nature of direct taxation, creating a regressive overall burden. [Statistische Auswertung und Untersuchungsplan]: The author outlines the specific plan for the study, including the use of various statistical averages (arithmetic mean, median, most frequent value) to handle the wide variance in consumption data. The plan includes an overview of 50 households, the consumption of key goods (salt, bread, meat, fats, sugar, stimulants), and the calculation of various burden coefficients. The goal is to compare results with previous research by Neumann and Gerloff. [Die Frage der Steuer- und Zollüberwälzung]: This chapter addresses the controversial issue of tax and tariff shifting (incidence). The author defends the methodology of Gerloff and Neumann against critics like Feig. He argues that even if a tariff does not cause a direct price increase, it often prevents a price decrease that would have occurred according to world market trends. The essence of a protective tariff is to ensure profitability for national labor through higher prices, which constitutes a burden on the consumer. [Kritik der amtlichen Verbrauchsziffern]: The author critiques the reliance on official 'consumption figures' derived from dividing total production/imports by population. He argues these figures are abstract and fail to capture the reality of individual household consumption. He defends household statistics as the only exact method for measuring how tax shifting affects different income levels, regardless of whether the shift is 50% or 100%. [Der Zolltarif von 1902 und seine Auswirkungen]: This section details the changes introduced by the Customs Tariff of 1902 (effective 1906). It lists specific goods affected, such as grain, coffee, meat, and fats. The author explains the technical conversion scales used to calculate the grain equivalent of bread and flour consumption to determine the actual tariff burden. He notes that the increase in tariffs (e.g., wheat from 3.5 to 5.5 marks) provides a ceiling for the expected increase in consumer burden. [Umrechnung von Fleisch-, Fett- und Genussmittelzöllen]: The author explains the complex conversion from live weight to slaughter weight for meat tariffs under the 1902 law. He calculates that the tariff burden per kilogram of beef and pork nearly doubled or tripled. The section also covers tariffs on fats (butter, lard, margarine) and stimulants like tobacco and coffee, noting that for coffee, the tariff on raw beans is the primary factor as most coffee is imported unroasted. [Das Material der Erhebung: Technikerhaushalte]: This section introduces the primary data: 50 year-long household records from German technician families (1912-1913). The author justifies using this specific professional group to ensure sociological consistency. It includes data on direct tax payments, including income tax and municipal surcharges, and provides a table correlating income levels with total direct tax burden. [Statistische Tabellen: Steuerleistung und Familienverhältnisse]: This segment provides detailed statistical tables for the 50 technician households. Table 1 categorizes households by income and direct tax burden. Table 2 lists individual household data including location (e.g., Dresden, Hamburg, Munich), number of persons, age of children, calculated consumption units (Quets), and annual income for the current and previous years. The data is grouped by income brackets from over 5000 marks down to 3000 marks. [Family Income Statistics: 2000 to 3000 Mark Range]: This segment presents a statistical table detailing family annual incomes between 2000 and 3000 Marks across various German cities including Berlin, Leipzig, and Breslau. The data includes household size, number of children, and specific income figures for the period around 1918. [V. Unter 2000 Mark Familien-Jahreseinkommen]: This segment provides statistical data on families with an annual income below 2000 Mark, including details on age, geographical distribution, and tax progression. It introduces the concept of 'consumption units' (Verbrauchseinheiten) as a standardized measure for household needs, noting that most families cluster around the mean value of 2.36 units. [Verbrauchseinheiten und Konsum von Grundnahrungsmitteln]: The author analyzes the relationship between income, family size, and the consumption of bread and meat. The data suggests that there is no clear correlation between income levels and the volume of grain or meat consumed in middle-class households, contrasting with previous studies on the working class by Neumann, Gerloff, and Mombert. [Methodik der Individualisierenden Betrachtung und Tabelle 3]: The author argues for an individualizing approach rather than relying solely on averages, which may mask the true diversity of living conditions. Table 3 is presented, detailing the consumption of flour and meat across 50 families sorted by income. [IV. Die Belastung der einzelnen Verbrauchsgegenstände: Getreide und Fleisch]: This section begins the main analysis of how specific goods (grain, meat, fats, sugar, salt, etc.) are burdened by taxes and tariffs. It specifically examines the impact of the 1902 tariff reforms on grain and meat, showing a higher absolute and relative burden on lower-income households compared to previous studies. [Gesamtbelastung durch Fleischzölle und Vergleich mit Arbeiterhaushalten]: A detailed breakdown of the combined burden of pork and beef tariffs. The author compares these findings with Gerloff's data on workers, concluding that the 1902 tariff increases significantly raised the tax burden on consumption units, particularly for lower and middle-income groups. [Belastung durch Fette, Zucker und Salz]: Analysis of the tax burden on fats (butter, lard, artificial fats), sugar, and salt. While the sugar tax shows a clear regressive tendency (burdening lower incomes more), salt consumption and its tax burden appear less dependent on income levels in middle-class households compared to poorer working-class families. [Genussmittel und Petroleum]: This segment covers 'Genussmittel' (stimulants/luxuries) such as tobacco, coffee, tea, and alcohol, as well as petroleum. The author notes that the burden of these goods is driven more by individual psychological habits and tastes than by income level, though a slight regressive trend is still visible for coffee and petroleum. [V. Die Gesamtbelastung des Nahrungs- und Genussmittelkonsums]: A synthesis of the total burden of indirect taxes and tariffs on essential food items. The data clearly demonstrates that lower-income groups pay a significantly higher percentage of their total income toward these taxes (up to 3.89%) compared to higher-income groups (as low as 1.12%). [Belastung des Arbeitseinkommens vs. Gesamteinkommen]: The author distinguishes between the 'labor income' of the household head and the 'total family income.' The analysis shows that when only labor income is considered, the regressive nature of consumption taxes becomes even more pronounced, particularly for those whose primary source of income is their work. [VI. Die Belastung nach Verbrauchseinheiten]: This section applies the 'consumption unit' methodology to normalize the tax burden across different family structures. It reveals that while the absolute tax amount per unit is relatively stable across income levels, the relative burden as a percentage of income remains sharply regressive. [VII. Ergebnisse und Finanzpolitische Folgerungen]: The final results confirm the 'statistical law' that indirect taxes disproportionately burden lower incomes. The author suggests that the progression of direct taxes is largely negated by the regressive nature of consumption taxes. He concludes by recommending that tax and wage policies should account for family size and consumption units to achieve social justice. [Inhaltsverzeichnis und Einleitung: Bedenken gegen die Vermögensabgabe]: This segment introduces the economic concerns regarding a one-time capital levy (Vermögensabgabe) to retire German war debt. The author contrasts the seductive simplicity of a one-time tax with the complex difficulties of implementation. He critiques the arguments of Diehl, Somary, and especially Dietzel, who claimed a capital levy would not harm national productivity. The author uses David Ricardo's theories on debt to argue that a one-time levy is only equivalent to a recurring tax if the capital's productivity equals the interest rate; otherwise, a levy can be more damaging to high-productivity enterprises. [Kapitalrentabilität und die Folgen der Kapitalverschiebung]: The author examines the average productivity of capital in the German economy, estimating it to be above 5%, which makes a one-time levy less attractive than annual taxation. He challenges the notion that a capital levy is merely a neutral redistribution from taxpayers to state creditors. He argues that returned capital will not fully flow back into production because creditors may use it to pay off debts to the central bank or invest in foreign securities and luxury goods to evade further taxation. [Auswirkungen auf Kreditfähigkeit und Unternehmensformen]: This section analyzes how a capital levy reduces the creditworthiness of businesses by shrinking their equity base. The author provides numerical examples showing that highly leveraged firms might be forced to downsize. He specifically warns that the levy favors impersonal corporations (Aktiengesellschaften) over personal enterprises (Einzelunternehmungen), as corporations can more easily raise new capital. This could accelerate the displacement of individual initiative by bureaucratic corporate structures, which the author views as socially and economically detrimental. [Vergleich zwischen einmaliger und fortlaufender Belastung]: The author argues against the necessity of a one-time levy to prevent 'unbearable' future taxes. He contends that a recurring property tax (Schulddienststeuer) is superior because it adjusts to the taxpayer's changing ability to pay and allows the state to benefit from future economic growth and potential interest rate conversions. He refutes Diehl's claim that a levy is needed for political or military strength, suggesting that overall fiscal health and a successful broad reform are more important than the absolute level of debt. [Die Gemeindefinanzen nach dem Kriege: Inhaltsverzeichnis]: Title page and start of the table of contents for a new section by Dr. Otto Most regarding municipal finances after the war. [Table of Contents for Otto Moß: Municipal Finance Reform]: A detailed table of contents for Otto Moß's contribution on the reorganization of municipal finance, covering the pre-war situation, war-time developments, tasks for the transition economy, and methods of covering expenditures. [The Pre-War Situation of Municipal Finance]: Moß analyzes the state of German municipal finances before 1914, noting that reform was universally recognized as necessary due to rising debt and tax burdens. He attributes the financial strain primarily to the expansion of optional municipal expenditures in social welfare, health, and education, driven by cultural progress and urban growth. He critiques 'municipal industrialism' and discusses the failed attempts at centralizing municipal credit and reforming local tax laws across various German states. [Development of Municipal Finance During the War]: This section examines the impact of World War I on municipal budgets. Expenditures skyrocketed due to war-related welfare (support for soldiers' families, war invalids, and food supply losses) and administrative costs (inflation-driven salary increases and interest on debt). Simultaneously, revenues from indirect taxes collapsed. Municipalities survived by raising income tax surcharges (often exceeding 200-300%) and increasing utility prices. Moß notes a shift where industrial 'war-gain' cities saw improved tax bases while residential and textile cities suffered. [Tasks of the Transition Economy]: Moß outlines the immense challenges facing municipalities after the war. These include catching up on deferred maintenance of infrastructure (roads, utilities), managing permanent salary increases for officials, and continuing war-related welfare. He highlights a looming housing crisis, estimating a massive shortage of small apartments, and argues for a proactive municipal population policy to counter birth rate declines. He stresses that while these are national issues, the burden of execution will fall on local governments. [Covering the Financial Deficit: Proposals for Reform]: Moß discusses how to fund the post-war municipal deficit. He argues that the Reich must take over direct war costs and interest burdens. For the remaining deficit, he explores radical proposals: increasing municipal participation in private industry (mixed-economy enterprises), establishing a municipal liquor monopoly (modeled on Scandinavia), and introducing a 'tax on income increases.' He warns against the nationalization of electricity, which would strip cities of vital revenue, and advocates for a cleaner separation of Reich, state, and local tax sources. [The Future of Our Municipal Finances (Schwarz): Introduction and Table of Contents]: Introduction and table of contents for D. Schwarz's section on the future of municipal finances, specifically focusing on Prussian conditions. It outlines the structure of the following essay, covering expenditure needs, various revenue sources (utilities, fees, indirect and direct taxes), and the problem of financial equalization between municipalities. [Historical Context and the Rise of Municipal Expenditure]: Schwarz provides a historical overview of municipal finance in Germany, noting that local administration only regained significance in the 19th century following the Stein reforms. The rapid growth of cities and industry since 1871 led to municipal expenditures and debts rising faster than those of the states. He notes the loss of traditional local consumption taxes to the Reich and the resulting heavy reliance on surcharges to the state income tax. [Post-War Expenditure Needs and the Limits of Frugality]: Schwarz estimates the post-war financial burden for Prussian municipalities, focusing on the need to consolidate floating war debts into long-term loans and address the massive backlog in infrastructure projects (gas, electricity, schools). While advocating for extreme frugality and administrative simplification, he argues that essential social, educational, and housing policies must be funded as they are 'productive' investments in the nation's future tax capacity. [Municipal Enterprises and Mixed-Economy Models]: Schwarz evaluates the potential for increased revenue from municipal enterprises. He discusses the possibility of cities acting as distribution organs for Reich monopolies (grain, meat, coal). He strongly advocates for the 'mixed-economy' model (public-private partnerships), arguing it combines the credit advantages and public interest of the municipality with the commercial agility and technical innovation of private enterprise. [Fees, Contributions, and Indirect Taxation]: This section covers non-direct tax revenues. Schwarz notes that fees and contributions (Beiträge) have limited growth potential due to legal restrictions. He argues for a restoration of local consumption taxes (beer, tobacco, spirits), which have been largely absorbed by the Reich. He suggests that since municipal social expenditures benefit the broad masses, it is fair to tax local consumption to fund them. He also explores the expansion of license taxes (Lizenzsteuern) based on English models. [Direct Taxation: Real Estate and Property Taxes]: Schwarz analyzes the 'Realsteuern' (taxes on land, buildings, and trade). He criticizes the outdated Prussian system of taxing 'yield' (Ertrag), which relies on decades-old assessments. He proposes a transition to taxation based on 'market value' (gemeiner Wert) to capture the increased value of light soils and urban land. He argues for a unified valuation system that can serve Reich, state, and municipal tax purposes simultaneously. [Trade Taxes and the Capital Yield Tax]: Schwarz discusses the trade tax (Gewerbesteuer), suggesting that its base rates could be increased for large enterprises while lowered for small businesses. He also argues for the introduction of a municipal capital yield tax (Kapitalrentensteuer) in Prussia. He notes that while land and trade are taxed locally, capital often escapes local burdens despite the increase in capital wealth due to war bonds. This tax would help equalize the burden between productive industry and passive wealth. [The Problem of Municipal Income Tax Surcharges]: Schwarz critiques the extreme reliance of Prussian cities on income tax surcharges, which often reach 200-300% of the state rate. This system encourages 'tax flight' of wealthy citizens to low-tax suburbs, further impoverishing industrial cities. He argues against allowing municipalities to apply their surcharges to the new, higher state war-tax rates, as the resulting progression would be mathematically absurd and socially destructive. He suggests the state should tax high incomes more, while municipalities focus on lower and middle income brackets. [Financial Equalization and the Future of Local Autonomy]: In the final section, Schwarz addresses the 'Lastenausgleich' (financial equalization) between rich and poor municipalities. He discusses the burden of school costs in industrial areas and road costs in the East. He explores the radical idea of changing tax jurisdiction so that income is taxed where it is earned (e.g., where the factory or mortgaged property is located) rather than where the owner resides. He concludes that while a perfect organic solution is difficult, a state-led equalization fund is necessary to prevent the total collapse of overburdened municipal finances.
Front matter for the second part of 'The Reorganization of German Finance' (1918), edited by Heinrich Herkner for the Verein für Sozialpolitik. It includes the title pages, publication details, and a comprehensive table of contents listing contributions on imperial tax reform, war cost coverage, tax jurisdiction, consumption taxes on middle incomes, wealth levies, and post-war municipal finances.
Read full textGustav Cohn provides a historical and critical perspective on German imperial finance reform. He compares Germany's current war debt to the British experience after the Napoleonic Wars, arguing that public debt can accompany economic growth if managed with 'cautious wisdom' and steady repayment. Cohn criticizes the term 'Vermögensabgabe' (wealth levy) as a deceptive bureaucratic neologism for what is logically a wealth tax. He argues against 'miracle cures' or radical state-socialist projects, advocating instead for the courageous development of existing tax systems, specifically calling for the reform of inheritance, wealth, and income taxes to achieve financial justice and meet the immense requirements of the war debt.
Read full textFranz Eulenburg examines the fundamental economic shifts caused by the war that must precede any financial planning. He argues that the 'national productive forces' (a concept from Friedrich List) have been severely depleted through the consumption of capital, raw materials, and human labor. Eulenburg highlights the deceptive nature of monetary values due to inflation, noting that while nominal wealth may appear high, real productivity in agriculture and industry has declined. He provides a detailed analysis of demographic losses, the qualitative decline of the labor force, and the impact of currency instability on future state expenditures and private investment. He concludes that the primary goal of finance policy must be the restoration and rationalization of these productive forces to lower production costs and increase the national surplus.
Read full textEulenburg explores the 'Rationalization of Economic Life' as the solution to Germany's financial crisis. He advocates for a 'scientific' approach to economic management, applying principles of efficiency (Taylorism) to materials, labor, and transport. He critiques the idea of state monopolies and forced syndicates, arguing that while they offer immediate fiscal revenue, they often lead to bureaucratic inefficiency and 'stiffening' of the economy. Instead, he suggests that the state should encourage the natural selection of the most efficient enterprises and locations. He discusses the potential for energy rationalization (e.g., gas long-distance lines) and the dangers of over-regulating the middle class or retail trade, which could lead to parasitic economic structures. The section emphasizes increasing the 'economic coefficient'—the ratio of output to input—as the only sustainable way to fund the state.
Read full textThe final section of Eulenburg's contribution addresses the social consequences of war-induced wealth concentration and inflation. He argues that rationalization must be balanced with social justice to maintain the health and productivity of the population. Key proposals include raising the tax-free minimum to account for currency devaluation, implementing tax relief based on the number of children (family policy), and shifting the tax burden toward the 'rentier' class and luxury consumption. He warns against artificial protections for inefficient middle-class businesses, suggesting instead that social policy should focus on the individual's standard of living and health. He concludes that the two pillars of future finance must be the increase of economic performance and a social balancing of burdens.
Read full textIntroductory page and table of contents for Edgar Jaffé's contribution regarding the principles of covering war costs and reforming the tax system. (Note: The full text of the essay begins in the subsequent chunk).
Read full textThis segment contains the table of contents for the work and an introduction discussing the long-term economic and financial consequences of the World War. Jaffé argues that economic stability will be more important than territorial changes and that the liquidation of war debt will occupy generations. He sets the stage for analyzing the absolute height of war expenditures for the German Empire as of late 1917.
Read full textJaffé analyzes the relationship between war costs (estimated at 140-150 billion Marks) and German national wealth (estimated at 300-350 billion Marks). He argues that the apparent loss of half the national wealth is a fallacy because most physical assets (land, factories, mines) remain. He distinguishes between actual capital loss (destruction, raw material depletion) and internal shifts caused by war profits and inflation. He concludes that a significant portion of war debt represents 'water' or price inflation rather than a loss of physical productivity.
Read full textThe author identifies a 'calculation error' where private wealth appears to have grown through war bonds while actual national assets have decreased. To prevent a catastrophic price revolution and restore the currency (Valuta), Jaffé proposes three measures: a high war profits tax (up to 80%), a general property levy (Vermögensabgabe) to align private balances with national reality, and strict price controls. He critiques the traditional resistance to property levies, arguing that in this unique post-war context, they are necessary to reduce the debt burden and incentivize renewed production.
Read full textJaffé outlines the structural challenges of reforming the German Imperial finances within a federalist system. He rejects total centralization but argues that the Empire must find new revenue sources beyond the traditional direct taxes reserved for federal states. He challenges both 'socialist' dogmas against indirect taxes and 'liberal' dogmas against production taxes. He proposes a system of 'Savings Taxes' (on luxury consumption) and 'Productivity Taxes' (Ergiebigkeitssteuern) that incentivize technical progress and efficiency through state-supervised cartels and monopolies.
Read full textThis segment details the specific tax instruments for the post-war era. It includes one-time measures like the war profits tax and property levy, and permanent measures such as inheritance taxes (including a state 'compulsory portion'), and state monopolies on tobacco, spirits, and grain. Jaffé also advocates for increasing state revenue through the unification of railways and the creation of state monopolies for electricity and foreign trade to stabilize the Mark and manage raw material scarcity.
Read full textThe author proposes a 'profitability tax' on corporate excess profits as a reserve measure and argues for a fundamental simplification of the German financial system. He critiques the historical fragmentation between Reich, state, and municipal administrations, advocating for a unified tax burden across all regions to eliminate injustices where certain areas are overburdened while others remain undertaxed. This unification is presented as a necessity to handle the immense costs of the ongoing World War and to compete with the efficient financial systems of England and the United States.
Read full textHerkner emphasizes the urgent need for immediate tax reform to address shifting income distributions and rising prices caused by the war. He criticizes the previous policy of relying solely on war loans without a plan for repayment, contrasting Germany's approach unfavorably with England's aggressive revenue increases. Furthermore, he warns that without intervention, the concentration of industry and the weakening of consumer power will lead to social unrest and the 'proletarianization' of valuable social strata.
Read full textThe author argues that as the state promotes industrial monopolization and syndication, it must also protect workers and consumers. He calls for the decoupling of labor from the raw mechanism of supply and demand by establishing state-mandated minimum wages and maximum prices. This 'social reconstruction' is framed as a necessary counterbalance to the loss of free competition, ensuring a dignified existence for the working class and preventing their exploitation by monopolized industries.
Read full textThis section introduces a contribution by Georg Strutz regarding the division of taxing authority between the Reich and individual states. Strutz outlines a hierarchy of taxes: the Reich should primarily claim consumption and transaction taxes, while direct taxes on income and property should remain the domain of individual states. He reviews the 1913 defense levies and argues that a general property tax for the Reich is currently unjustified, suggesting an expanded inheritance tax as the only tolerable alternative for the states.
Read full textHerkner contrasts the pre-war financial situation of 1913 with the immense fiscal challenges facing the German Empire following World War I. He critiques the lack of transparency regarding war costs and argues that earlier opportunities for savings were missed. The author emphasizes that the post-war debt, interest burdens, and social welfare costs for veterans will require a massive increase in Reich revenue, far exceeding pre-war levels.
Read full textThe text examines the dire financial state of individual German states and municipalities, noting significant tax losses and increased debt due to the war. Herkner highlights the 'Raubbau' (predatory exploitation) of infrastructure like railways and public buildings, which will require massive investment to repair. He also discusses the rising costs of civil service pensions due to war-related health decline and the necessity of administrative simplification.
Read full textHerkner argues that the shift in financial burden toward the Reich necessitates a expansion of its tax territory at the expense of individual states. He dismisses the likelihood of significant war reparations and evaluates emergency measures like a one-time capital levy (Vermögensabgabe) or a forced loan (Zwangsanleihe). He warns that such measures, while potentially necessary, risk undermining credit and economic recovery if not carefully managed.
Read full textThe author advocates for an organic, unified tax system where Reich, state, and local taxes complement each other to achieve social justice. He defends indirect consumption taxes by arguing they often function as luxury taxes or are offset by direct taxes on the wealthy. He provides a detailed breakdown of the 1913 tax burden, showing the shift toward direct taxation and the role of social insurance as a form of wealth redistribution.
Read full textThis section analyzes the nature of transaction taxes (Verkehrssteuern) and their historical migration from state to Reich control. Herkner critiques the inconsistent classification of taxes like the 'Tantiemesteuer' and 'Talonsteuer'. He suggests that the Reich should consolidate transaction taxes while states focus on direct income and property taxes, maintaining a balance between federal unity and state autonomy.
Read full textHerkner proposes a significant expansion of consumption taxes on non-essential goods like tobacco, alcohol, and luxury wines. He explores the potential for state monopolies in sectors like electricity, coal, and potash to generate revenue and stabilize prices. He also discusses the possibility of import monopolies to manage currency valuation and shipping shortages, while cautioning against excessive state 'schoolmastering' of the public's consumption habits.
Read full textThe author evaluates various forms of general consumption taxes, including receipt stamps and turnover taxes, favoring the latter as a supplement to specific luxury taxes. He critiques Mombert's 'consumption income tax' as too intrusive. The section also covers reforms to insurance taxes and advocates for a comprehensive Reich inheritance tax, arguing that taxing estates at death is less economically damaging than high annual property taxes during a recovery period.
Read full textHerkner discusses the expansion of inheritance taxes to include direct descendants and spouses, while warning against the total abolition of testamentary freedom. He critiques proposals for a 'Reich's compulsory portion' (Pflichtteilsrecht des Reiches) as being detrimental to population growth and individual motivation. He argues that excessive state claims on estates would lead to capital flight and the consumption of wealth during the owner's lifetime.
Read full textThe text provides a deep analysis of the proposed one-time capital levy (Vermögensabgabe). Herkner expresses skepticism about its effectiveness in significantly reducing war debt without crippling the economy. He highlights the 'liquidity trap'—where the state owns assets it cannot easily sell—and the potential for capital flight. He argues that such a levy would disproportionately harm the middle class and disrupt the capital necessary for industrial reconstruction.
Read full textHerkner compares a one-time levy with a permanent, moderate Reich property tax, favoring the latter for its stability. He discusses the necessity of a wealth increment tax (Vermögenszuwachssteuer) to capture war profits. Crucially, he opposes a federal Reich income tax for individuals, as it would 'mediatize' the states, but supports a unified Reich corporate tax (Gesellschaftssteuer) to simplify the taxation of large industrial enterprises across state lines.
Read full textThe final section of this chunk explores the 'refinement' of matricular contributions (state payments to the Reich). Herkner suggests using property assessments or state railway surpluses as a fairer metric for these contributions. This would allow states to remain 'masters in their own house' regarding individual income taxes while still funding the Reich. The chunk concludes with the start of a new section by Adolf Günther on the tax burden of lower-income groups.
Read full textThis segment contains the table of contents for the second part of the work and begins the first chapter on methodological questions. It discusses the validity of using averages and mean values in social statistics, referencing key theorists like von Mayr, Zizek, and von Bortkiewicz. The author emphasizes the need for caution when applying established methods to calculate the burden of consumption taxes on households.
Read full textThe author critiques the assumptions of early researchers like Neumann, Gerloff, and Mombert regarding the uniformity of consumption patterns. He argues that modern life shows a great variety of realities, influenced by factors like family planning and social pressure, which makes simple average calculations problematic. The section highlights the shift from assuming rigid consumption laws to recognizing individual choice and the impact of family size on the 'food percentage' of income.
Read full textThis section describes the methodological shift from extensive (large-scale) to intensive (detailed individual) research in household statistics. The author explains the use of 50 specific technician households for the study, applying an individualizing method. It also discusses the concept of 'Quets' (consumption units) and how family composition affects the tax burden even within the same income level due to varying food expenditure percentages.
Read full textThe author defines 'special' and 'general' burden coefficients to measure the impact of taxes and tariffs on specific goods versus total income. He argues for comparing the burden against both total family income and the primary earner's labor income to assess fiscal justice. The section also addresses how price fluctuations can distort these coefficients, making them relative rather than absolute measures of burden.
Read full textThis segment explores whether tariffs and indirect taxes suppress consumption, particularly in poorer or larger families. It notes that taxes often lead to price increases beyond the nominal tax rate as producers and retailers adjust prices. The author also discusses the interaction between direct and indirect taxes, noting that indirect taxes can negate the progressive nature of direct taxation, creating a regressive overall burden.
Read full textThe author outlines the specific plan for the study, including the use of various statistical averages (arithmetic mean, median, most frequent value) to handle the wide variance in consumption data. The plan includes an overview of 50 households, the consumption of key goods (salt, bread, meat, fats, sugar, stimulants), and the calculation of various burden coefficients. The goal is to compare results with previous research by Neumann and Gerloff.
Read full textThis chapter addresses the controversial issue of tax and tariff shifting (incidence). The author defends the methodology of Gerloff and Neumann against critics like Feig. He argues that even if a tariff does not cause a direct price increase, it often prevents a price decrease that would have occurred according to world market trends. The essence of a protective tariff is to ensure profitability for national labor through higher prices, which constitutes a burden on the consumer.
Read full textThe author critiques the reliance on official 'consumption figures' derived from dividing total production/imports by population. He argues these figures are abstract and fail to capture the reality of individual household consumption. He defends household statistics as the only exact method for measuring how tax shifting affects different income levels, regardless of whether the shift is 50% or 100%.
Read full textThis section details the changes introduced by the Customs Tariff of 1902 (effective 1906). It lists specific goods affected, such as grain, coffee, meat, and fats. The author explains the technical conversion scales used to calculate the grain equivalent of bread and flour consumption to determine the actual tariff burden. He notes that the increase in tariffs (e.g., wheat from 3.5 to 5.5 marks) provides a ceiling for the expected increase in consumer burden.
Read full textThe author explains the complex conversion from live weight to slaughter weight for meat tariffs under the 1902 law. He calculates that the tariff burden per kilogram of beef and pork nearly doubled or tripled. The section also covers tariffs on fats (butter, lard, margarine) and stimulants like tobacco and coffee, noting that for coffee, the tariff on raw beans is the primary factor as most coffee is imported unroasted.
Read full textThis section introduces the primary data: 50 year-long household records from German technician families (1912-1913). The author justifies using this specific professional group to ensure sociological consistency. It includes data on direct tax payments, including income tax and municipal surcharges, and provides a table correlating income levels with total direct tax burden.
Read full textThis segment provides detailed statistical tables for the 50 technician households. Table 1 categorizes households by income and direct tax burden. Table 2 lists individual household data including location (e.g., Dresden, Hamburg, Munich), number of persons, age of children, calculated consumption units (Quets), and annual income for the current and previous years. The data is grouped by income brackets from over 5000 marks down to 3000 marks.
Read full textThis segment presents a statistical table detailing family annual incomes between 2000 and 3000 Marks across various German cities including Berlin, Leipzig, and Breslau. The data includes household size, number of children, and specific income figures for the period around 1918.
Read full textThis segment provides statistical data on families with an annual income below 2000 Mark, including details on age, geographical distribution, and tax progression. It introduces the concept of 'consumption units' (Verbrauchseinheiten) as a standardized measure for household needs, noting that most families cluster around the mean value of 2.36 units.
Read full textThe author analyzes the relationship between income, family size, and the consumption of bread and meat. The data suggests that there is no clear correlation between income levels and the volume of grain or meat consumed in middle-class households, contrasting with previous studies on the working class by Neumann, Gerloff, and Mombert.
Read full textThe author argues for an individualizing approach rather than relying solely on averages, which may mask the true diversity of living conditions. Table 3 is presented, detailing the consumption of flour and meat across 50 families sorted by income.
Read full textThis section begins the main analysis of how specific goods (grain, meat, fats, sugar, salt, etc.) are burdened by taxes and tariffs. It specifically examines the impact of the 1902 tariff reforms on grain and meat, showing a higher absolute and relative burden on lower-income households compared to previous studies.
Read full textA detailed breakdown of the combined burden of pork and beef tariffs. The author compares these findings with Gerloff's data on workers, concluding that the 1902 tariff increases significantly raised the tax burden on consumption units, particularly for lower and middle-income groups.
Read full textAnalysis of the tax burden on fats (butter, lard, artificial fats), sugar, and salt. While the sugar tax shows a clear regressive tendency (burdening lower incomes more), salt consumption and its tax burden appear less dependent on income levels in middle-class households compared to poorer working-class families.
Read full textThis segment covers 'Genussmittel' (stimulants/luxuries) such as tobacco, coffee, tea, and alcohol, as well as petroleum. The author notes that the burden of these goods is driven more by individual psychological habits and tastes than by income level, though a slight regressive trend is still visible for coffee and petroleum.
Read full textA synthesis of the total burden of indirect taxes and tariffs on essential food items. The data clearly demonstrates that lower-income groups pay a significantly higher percentage of their total income toward these taxes (up to 3.89%) compared to higher-income groups (as low as 1.12%).
Read full textThe author distinguishes between the 'labor income' of the household head and the 'total family income.' The analysis shows that when only labor income is considered, the regressive nature of consumption taxes becomes even more pronounced, particularly for those whose primary source of income is their work.
Read full textThis section applies the 'consumption unit' methodology to normalize the tax burden across different family structures. It reveals that while the absolute tax amount per unit is relatively stable across income levels, the relative burden as a percentage of income remains sharply regressive.
Read full textThe final results confirm the 'statistical law' that indirect taxes disproportionately burden lower incomes. The author suggests that the progression of direct taxes is largely negated by the regressive nature of consumption taxes. He concludes by recommending that tax and wage policies should account for family size and consumption units to achieve social justice.
Read full textThis segment introduces the economic concerns regarding a one-time capital levy (Vermögensabgabe) to retire German war debt. The author contrasts the seductive simplicity of a one-time tax with the complex difficulties of implementation. He critiques the arguments of Diehl, Somary, and especially Dietzel, who claimed a capital levy would not harm national productivity. The author uses David Ricardo's theories on debt to argue that a one-time levy is only equivalent to a recurring tax if the capital's productivity equals the interest rate; otherwise, a levy can be more damaging to high-productivity enterprises.
Read full textThe author examines the average productivity of capital in the German economy, estimating it to be above 5%, which makes a one-time levy less attractive than annual taxation. He challenges the notion that a capital levy is merely a neutral redistribution from taxpayers to state creditors. He argues that returned capital will not fully flow back into production because creditors may use it to pay off debts to the central bank or invest in foreign securities and luxury goods to evade further taxation.
Read full textThis section analyzes how a capital levy reduces the creditworthiness of businesses by shrinking their equity base. The author provides numerical examples showing that highly leveraged firms might be forced to downsize. He specifically warns that the levy favors impersonal corporations (Aktiengesellschaften) over personal enterprises (Einzelunternehmungen), as corporations can more easily raise new capital. This could accelerate the displacement of individual initiative by bureaucratic corporate structures, which the author views as socially and economically detrimental.
Read full textThe author argues against the necessity of a one-time levy to prevent 'unbearable' future taxes. He contends that a recurring property tax (Schulddienststeuer) is superior because it adjusts to the taxpayer's changing ability to pay and allows the state to benefit from future economic growth and potential interest rate conversions. He refutes Diehl's claim that a levy is needed for political or military strength, suggesting that overall fiscal health and a successful broad reform are more important than the absolute level of debt.
Read full textTitle page and start of the table of contents for a new section by Dr. Otto Most regarding municipal finances after the war.
Read full textA detailed table of contents for Otto Moß's contribution on the reorganization of municipal finance, covering the pre-war situation, war-time developments, tasks for the transition economy, and methods of covering expenditures.
Read full textMoß analyzes the state of German municipal finances before 1914, noting that reform was universally recognized as necessary due to rising debt and tax burdens. He attributes the financial strain primarily to the expansion of optional municipal expenditures in social welfare, health, and education, driven by cultural progress and urban growth. He critiques 'municipal industrialism' and discusses the failed attempts at centralizing municipal credit and reforming local tax laws across various German states.
Read full textThis section examines the impact of World War I on municipal budgets. Expenditures skyrocketed due to war-related welfare (support for soldiers' families, war invalids, and food supply losses) and administrative costs (inflation-driven salary increases and interest on debt). Simultaneously, revenues from indirect taxes collapsed. Municipalities survived by raising income tax surcharges (often exceeding 200-300%) and increasing utility prices. Moß notes a shift where industrial 'war-gain' cities saw improved tax bases while residential and textile cities suffered.
Read full textMoß outlines the immense challenges facing municipalities after the war. These include catching up on deferred maintenance of infrastructure (roads, utilities), managing permanent salary increases for officials, and continuing war-related welfare. He highlights a looming housing crisis, estimating a massive shortage of small apartments, and argues for a proactive municipal population policy to counter birth rate declines. He stresses that while these are national issues, the burden of execution will fall on local governments.
Read full textMoß discusses how to fund the post-war municipal deficit. He argues that the Reich must take over direct war costs and interest burdens. For the remaining deficit, he explores radical proposals: increasing municipal participation in private industry (mixed-economy enterprises), establishing a municipal liquor monopoly (modeled on Scandinavia), and introducing a 'tax on income increases.' He warns against the nationalization of electricity, which would strip cities of vital revenue, and advocates for a cleaner separation of Reich, state, and local tax sources.
Read full textIntroduction and table of contents for D. Schwarz's section on the future of municipal finances, specifically focusing on Prussian conditions. It outlines the structure of the following essay, covering expenditure needs, various revenue sources (utilities, fees, indirect and direct taxes), and the problem of financial equalization between municipalities.
Read full textSchwarz provides a historical overview of municipal finance in Germany, noting that local administration only regained significance in the 19th century following the Stein reforms. The rapid growth of cities and industry since 1871 led to municipal expenditures and debts rising faster than those of the states. He notes the loss of traditional local consumption taxes to the Reich and the resulting heavy reliance on surcharges to the state income tax.
Read full textSchwarz estimates the post-war financial burden for Prussian municipalities, focusing on the need to consolidate floating war debts into long-term loans and address the massive backlog in infrastructure projects (gas, electricity, schools). While advocating for extreme frugality and administrative simplification, he argues that essential social, educational, and housing policies must be funded as they are 'productive' investments in the nation's future tax capacity.
Read full textSchwarz evaluates the potential for increased revenue from municipal enterprises. He discusses the possibility of cities acting as distribution organs for Reich monopolies (grain, meat, coal). He strongly advocates for the 'mixed-economy' model (public-private partnerships), arguing it combines the credit advantages and public interest of the municipality with the commercial agility and technical innovation of private enterprise.
Read full textThis section covers non-direct tax revenues. Schwarz notes that fees and contributions (Beiträge) have limited growth potential due to legal restrictions. He argues for a restoration of local consumption taxes (beer, tobacco, spirits), which have been largely absorbed by the Reich. He suggests that since municipal social expenditures benefit the broad masses, it is fair to tax local consumption to fund them. He also explores the expansion of license taxes (Lizenzsteuern) based on English models.
Read full textSchwarz analyzes the 'Realsteuern' (taxes on land, buildings, and trade). He criticizes the outdated Prussian system of taxing 'yield' (Ertrag), which relies on decades-old assessments. He proposes a transition to taxation based on 'market value' (gemeiner Wert) to capture the increased value of light soils and urban land. He argues for a unified valuation system that can serve Reich, state, and municipal tax purposes simultaneously.
Read full textSchwarz discusses the trade tax (Gewerbesteuer), suggesting that its base rates could be increased for large enterprises while lowered for small businesses. He also argues for the introduction of a municipal capital yield tax (Kapitalrentensteuer) in Prussia. He notes that while land and trade are taxed locally, capital often escapes local burdens despite the increase in capital wealth due to war bonds. This tax would help equalize the burden between productive industry and passive wealth.
Read full textSchwarz critiques the extreme reliance of Prussian cities on income tax surcharges, which often reach 200-300% of the state rate. This system encourages 'tax flight' of wealthy citizens to low-tax suburbs, further impoverishing industrial cities. He argues against allowing municipalities to apply their surcharges to the new, higher state war-tax rates, as the resulting progression would be mathematically absurd and socially destructive. He suggests the state should tax high incomes more, while municipalities focus on lower and middle income brackets.
Read full textIn the final section, Schwarz addresses the 'Lastenausgleich' (financial equalization) between rich and poor municipalities. He discusses the burden of school costs in industrial areas and road costs in the East. He explores the radical idea of changing tax jurisdiction so that income is taxed where it is earned (e.g., where the factory or mortgaged property is located) rather than where the owner resides. He concludes that while a perfect organic solution is difficult, a state-led equalization fund is necessary to prevent the total collapse of overburdened municipal finances.
Read full text