by Sennholz
[Front Matter and Publication Details]: This segment contains the title page and publication metadata for 'Man and Nature', a Freeman Classic edited by Hans F. Sennholz. It includes information about the publisher (The Foundation for Economic Education), the John Locke Foundation, the ISBN, and copyright details from 1993. [Table of Contents]: The table of contents for the volume, outlining three major sections: 'Friends of the Earth and Foes of Man', 'Human Rights and Animal Rights', and 'Enemies of the Market Order'. It lists essays by various authors addressing the intersection of environmentalism, property rights, and economic systems. [Table of Contents: Part IV and Introduction]: This segment completes the table of contents and provides the book's introduction by Hans F. Sennholz. It tracks the rise of environmentalism in public opinion and argues that environmental problems are often the result of public property mismanagement, suggesting that economic freedom and private property are the true solutions to pollution. [Wilderness Cathedrals and the Public Good]: William C. Dennis critiques the 'public interest' justifications for government wilderness preservation. He traces the history of the movement from 19th-century masculine virtues and scientific management to modern 'secular salvation' arguments. Dennis argues that state-managed wilderness is a form of wealth transfer and suggests that 'disestablishing' wilderness—moving it to private hands—would lead to better stewardship and expanded liberty, similar to the disestablishment of state churches. [Take Back the Environment]: Jorge E. Amador argues that government regulation often protects polluters rather than victims by legitimizing 'permitted' releases of toxins. He provides a historical analysis of how common law protections (nuisance and trespass) were weakened to favor industrial growth. Amador proposes returning to strict liability and private property rights, allowing individuals to sue for damages or negotiate 'licenses to pollute' as a more efficient and just alternative to bureaucratic management. [Attack in the Adirondacks]: Michael W. Fanning details the struggle of 'inholders'—private property owners within New York's Adirondack State Park—against the Adirondack Park Agency (APA). Through several case studies, he illustrates how restrictive zoning, bureaucratic delays, and the threat of eminent domain effectively strip owners of their rights without compensation. The essay critiques the expansion of environmental bureaucracy and the proposed '21st Century Commission' recommendations as a form of creeping socialism disguised as conservation. [A Checklist for Healthy Skeptics]: Dianne L. Durante provides a framework for evaluating environmental 'doom' predictions found in popular media. She examines specific cases like Alar, Three Mile Island, and DDT to show how risks are often exaggerated while benefits are ignored. Durante argues that the mind and technology are man's tools for survival and that environmental problems are best solved by rational individuals in a free market rather than through paternalistic government intervention. [Footnote 13 and Introduction to The Worst Polluters]: This segment concludes the previous essay's footnotes and introduces John K. Williams' essay 'The Worst Polluters'. It outlines common arguments used by both critics and defenders of the market regarding environmental pollution, questioning whether pollution is an inherent result of capitalism. [Pollution in Socialist and Communist Economies]: John K. Williams examines the environmental records of socialist and communist regimes, including Poland, the USSR, and China. He provides evidence of extreme chemical pollution, acid rain damage to historical sites, and the destruction of natural resources like Lake Baikal to argue that pollution is not a market-created phenomenon but is often worse under state control. [Property Rights and the Legal History of Pollution]: The author argues that pollution persists because governments historically undermined private property rights and Common Law protections (like the tort of nuisance) to favor industrial progress. By reclassifying air and water as 'public goods' or 'unowned' resources in the public domain, the state removed the economic incentives for polluters to be responsible for their environmental costs. [Conclusion: Man and Nature]: The concluding section of Sennholz's article argues that the free market, through the enforcement of private property rights and common law principles like trespass and nuisance, is the solution to pollution rather than its cause. It asserts that environmental problems are the result of statist interventions rather than the capitalist system. [Overpopulation: The Perennial Myth]: David Osterfeld challenges the historical and modern fears of overpopulation, tracing the 'catastrophist' lineage from Tertullian and Malthus to Paul Ehrlich. He provides empirical data showing that despite a sixfold increase in population since the 18th century, world output has increased eightyfold, making food and resources more abundant and cheaper. He argues that human intelligence and market institutions transform nature into resources, and that private property rights ensure that shortages are met with entrepreneurial solutions. He concludes that the world is becoming relatively less populated by meaningful measures as growth rates decline and real wages rise. [Human Rights, Animal Rights, and Friends of the Earth]: Sylvester Petro critiques the Endangered Species Act and the concept of animal rights as a form of covert aggression against private property. He argues that rights are a human construct based on rational exchange and mutual duties, which animals are incapable of participating in. He contends that the best protection for the environment is the right of private property, as owners have a natural incentive to care for and improve their land, whereas collective or state ownership leads to mismanagement. [Private Property Rights: An Endangered Species]: Paul D. Kamenar details the case of John Pozsgai, who was sentenced to three years in prison for placing clean topsoil on his own property, which the EPA classified as a 'wetland.' The essay highlights the erosion of property rights under environmental regulations like the Clean Water Act. Kamenar argues that overzealous bureaucrats are criminalizing productive activity and that the definition of 'wetlands' has been expanded beyond reason to facilitate federal land-use control. [Elephants and Ivory]: Elizabeth Larson compares the success of elephant conservation in Zimbabwe, which utilizes private property rights and economic incentives for local villagers, with the failure of state-managed, ban-centered policies in Kenya. She argues that the international ivory trade ban may actually harm elephants by removing the economic value that encourages local communities to protect them from poachers and habitat loss. The Zimbabwean model shows that when villagers profit from sustainable management, elephant populations thrive. [Ecology, Socialism, and Capitalism]: Tibor Machan discusses the failure of collectivism and the emergence of environmentalism as a new justification for state control. Referencing Aristotle, Mises, and Garrett Hardin, he argues that the 'tragedy of the commons' is caused by a lack of private property rights. He critiques Robert Heilbroner's suggestion that the ecological crisis requires a move away from capitalism, asserting instead that a healthy environment is best achieved through the protection of individual rights and the market order. [The Toxicity of Environmentalism]: George Reisman presents a comprehensive critique of the environmental movement, labeling it as a form of nihilism that hates human life and reason. He argues that the movement's core premise—the 'intrinsic value' of nature—is used to negate human values and dismantle industrial civilization. Reisman defends the Industrial Revolution as the means by which man improves his environment through the use of man-made power. He dismisses various environmental scares (Alar, global warming, ozone depletion) as pseudo-science designed to instill fear and justify state control. He concludes that the solution to environmental concerns lies in capitalism, private property, and a return to the philosophical values of reason as championed by Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises. [The Environmental Ethic and its Critics]: Robert James Bidinotto analyzes the philosophical roots of the environmental movement, distinguishing between 'Deep Ecologists' (who seek to obliterate modern society) and 'Greens' (who seek to control it through socialism). He critiques the concepts of 'biospheric egalitarianism' and 'animal rights' as being fundamentally at odds with human nature and reason. Bidinotto also examines the manipulation of scientific data regarding global warming and other scares to justify massive government intervention and the 'insurance policy' ruse used to bypass the need for evidence. [Why Socialism Causes Pollution]: Thomas J. DiLorenzo introduces the argument that socialism, rather than the profit motive of free enterprise, is the primary cause of severe environmental degradation. He points to the catastrophic pollution levels in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe as evidence that state control fails to protect the environment. [Socialist Pollution: The Soviet Union]: This section examines the severe environmental degradation in the Soviet Union, attributing it to the 'tragedy of the commons' inherent in socialist systems where property is government-owned. It details catastrophic damage to the Black Sea, the shrinking of the Aral and Caspian seas, and the extreme pollution of Lake Baikal and major rivers like the Volga. The author argues that the Soviet production ethic prioritized economic growth at any cost, leading to a lack of public accountability and the destruction of vast natural resources. [Environmental Consequences in China and Eastern Europe]: An overview of the environmental 'nightmare' left by communist regimes in China and Eastern Europe. In China, air pollution and the 'Great Leap Forward' led to massive forest death and soil infertility. In Poland and Czechoslovakia, industrial dust, acid rain, and toxic waste have caused severe health crises, including high rates of respiratory disease and birth defects. The section highlights how central planning and the lack of private property rights resulted in the destruction of forests, rivers, and entire towns across the Eastern Bloc. [United States: Public Sector Pollution]: This segment challenges the idea that democratic processes prevent public sector pollution by examining the United States government's own environmental record. It identifies the Department of Defense as a leading producer of hazardous waste and notes the EPA's limited enforcement power over other federal agencies. Examples include the toxic Rocky Mountain Arsenal, the Tennessee Valley Authority's resistance to clean air standards, and federal agricultural policies that encourage soil erosion. [Policy Implications: Property Rights and the Tragedy of the Commons]: This section argues that environmental harm is not caused by free enterprise but by the failure of legal institutions to enforce property rights. It critiques the Progressive Era for weakening individual rights in favor of perceived public interest and advocates for a return to English common law traditions. The text identifies the 'tragedy of the commons' as the primary driver of pollution in socialist systems and public lands, concluding that sound liability laws and private property are the essential pillars of environmental protection. [Notes for Section III]: A list of 23 citations supporting the previous discussion on environmental degradation, specifically referencing Soviet pollution, Eastern European industrial filth, and American legal transformations. [Privatization: Best Hope for a Vanishing Wilderness]: Lawrence W. Reed argues that private property is the most effective tool for environmental conservation, contrasting it with the neglect often found in 'public' property. He provides detailed case studies of private organizations like The Nature Conservancy and the National Audubon Society, demonstrating how they use market mechanisms and ownership to protect ecologically significant areas more effectively than government mandates. [Case Studies in Private Conservation]: This segment details eight specific examples of private conservation initiatives. It covers The Nature Conservancy's real estate approach, the National Audubon Society's management of the Rainey Sanctuary (including compatible oil drilling), for-profit conservation at Sea Lion Caves, multiple-use timber management in North Maine Woods, and innovative livestock/wildlife integration at Deseret Land & Livestock. It also touches on 'debt-for-nature' swaps by Conservation International and the work of Ducks Unlimited and Trout Unlimited. [Making Every Drop Count: The Case for Water Markets]: Don Leal explores how water markets and transferable property rights can solve water shortages and improve environmental quality in the American West. He critiques the 'iron triangle' of federal water projects and the Bureau of Reclamation's historical role in subsidizing waste. The essay advocates for allowing private ownership of instream flows to protect fish habitats and warns that the 'public trust doctrine' threatens to undermine the property rights necessary for efficient water trading. [Aquaculture: The Birth of an Industry]: J. Brian Phillips discusses the rise of aquaculture (fish farming) as a free-market solution to the depletion of ocean fisheries caused by the 'tragedy of the commons.' He explains how government subsidies and lack of ownership lead to overfishing, whereas aquaculture provides incentives for conservation through private ownership. The text also explores mariculture (fish ranching) and the legal hurdles regarding property rights in open waters, while addressing environmentalist concerns and regulatory obstacles. [What Garbage Crisis?]: Charles W. Baird challenges the notion of a 'garbage crisis,' arguing that perceived shortages in disposal capacity are the result of faulty government policy rather than physical limits. He advocates for the privatization of landfills and incinerators to ensure liability and proper pricing. Baird critiques mandatory recycling as often being cost-inefficient and 'anti-green,' defends the use of plastics and aseptic packaging based on their lower environmental impact, and suggests that market-based 'pay-as-you-throw' fees are the best way to manage waste. [Pollution Control and Biblical Justice]: Gary North applies biblical principles from Exodus to the problem of pollution, arguing that private property and personal liability are the foundations of both capitalism and environmental protection. He discusses the 'tragedy of the commons' in the context of common ownership and uses the biblical law of fire to establish a framework for pollution restitution. North introduces concepts like the 'pollution easement' and argues that known pollution is often accounted for in land price discounts, while emphasizing that judges must use biblical standards to adjudicate social costs and benefits. [Conclusion and Footnotes for Biblical Principles of Pollution Control]: Concludes the discussion on biblical principles of pollution control by critiquing humanistic economics for its inability to solve the problem of subjective utility. It provides a comprehensive list of footnotes referencing works by Gary North, Garrett Hardin, J. H. Dales, and F. A. Harper regarding property rights and environmental policy. [Controlling Pollution]: Hans Sennholz argues that the environmental crisis is primarily a failure of government rather than private enterprise. He identifies government-operated utilities, public sewer systems, and subsidized highways as the leading sources of pollution. Sennholz critiques zoning laws and the deterioration of public transport while advocating for the restoration of strict private property rights and the elimination of government subsidies to polluters as the primary solutions to environmental degradation. [A Conservationist Looks at Freedom]: Leonard Read distinguishes between 'preservation' (retention undisturbed) and 'conservation' (the wise use of resources for the best interests of man). He argues that the free market is a more effective conservator than government, citing examples from private timberland management and private recreational areas like Disneyland compared to government-run parks. Read emphasizes that both monetary and psychic profits drive individuals to manage resources efficiently and aesthetically when government does not pre-empt private action. [Index and Publication Information]: A comprehensive index for the 'Man and Nature' anthology, followed by a price list for The Freeman Classics series and a brief history of the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE).
This segment contains the title page and publication metadata for 'Man and Nature', a Freeman Classic edited by Hans F. Sennholz. It includes information about the publisher (The Foundation for Economic Education), the John Locke Foundation, the ISBN, and copyright details from 1993.
Read full textThe table of contents for the volume, outlining three major sections: 'Friends of the Earth and Foes of Man', 'Human Rights and Animal Rights', and 'Enemies of the Market Order'. It lists essays by various authors addressing the intersection of environmentalism, property rights, and economic systems.
Read full textThis segment completes the table of contents and provides the book's introduction by Hans F. Sennholz. It tracks the rise of environmentalism in public opinion and argues that environmental problems are often the result of public property mismanagement, suggesting that economic freedom and private property are the true solutions to pollution.
Read full textWilliam C. Dennis critiques the 'public interest' justifications for government wilderness preservation. He traces the history of the movement from 19th-century masculine virtues and scientific management to modern 'secular salvation' arguments. Dennis argues that state-managed wilderness is a form of wealth transfer and suggests that 'disestablishing' wilderness—moving it to private hands—would lead to better stewardship and expanded liberty, similar to the disestablishment of state churches.
Read full textJorge E. Amador argues that government regulation often protects polluters rather than victims by legitimizing 'permitted' releases of toxins. He provides a historical analysis of how common law protections (nuisance and trespass) were weakened to favor industrial growth. Amador proposes returning to strict liability and private property rights, allowing individuals to sue for damages or negotiate 'licenses to pollute' as a more efficient and just alternative to bureaucratic management.
Read full textMichael W. Fanning details the struggle of 'inholders'—private property owners within New York's Adirondack State Park—against the Adirondack Park Agency (APA). Through several case studies, he illustrates how restrictive zoning, bureaucratic delays, and the threat of eminent domain effectively strip owners of their rights without compensation. The essay critiques the expansion of environmental bureaucracy and the proposed '21st Century Commission' recommendations as a form of creeping socialism disguised as conservation.
Read full textDianne L. Durante provides a framework for evaluating environmental 'doom' predictions found in popular media. She examines specific cases like Alar, Three Mile Island, and DDT to show how risks are often exaggerated while benefits are ignored. Durante argues that the mind and technology are man's tools for survival and that environmental problems are best solved by rational individuals in a free market rather than through paternalistic government intervention.
Read full textThis segment concludes the previous essay's footnotes and introduces John K. Williams' essay 'The Worst Polluters'. It outlines common arguments used by both critics and defenders of the market regarding environmental pollution, questioning whether pollution is an inherent result of capitalism.
Read full textJohn K. Williams examines the environmental records of socialist and communist regimes, including Poland, the USSR, and China. He provides evidence of extreme chemical pollution, acid rain damage to historical sites, and the destruction of natural resources like Lake Baikal to argue that pollution is not a market-created phenomenon but is often worse under state control.
Read full textThe author argues that pollution persists because governments historically undermined private property rights and Common Law protections (like the tort of nuisance) to favor industrial progress. By reclassifying air and water as 'public goods' or 'unowned' resources in the public domain, the state removed the economic incentives for polluters to be responsible for their environmental costs.
Read full textThe concluding section of Sennholz's article argues that the free market, through the enforcement of private property rights and common law principles like trespass and nuisance, is the solution to pollution rather than its cause. It asserts that environmental problems are the result of statist interventions rather than the capitalist system.
Read full textDavid Osterfeld challenges the historical and modern fears of overpopulation, tracing the 'catastrophist' lineage from Tertullian and Malthus to Paul Ehrlich. He provides empirical data showing that despite a sixfold increase in population since the 18th century, world output has increased eightyfold, making food and resources more abundant and cheaper. He argues that human intelligence and market institutions transform nature into resources, and that private property rights ensure that shortages are met with entrepreneurial solutions. He concludes that the world is becoming relatively less populated by meaningful measures as growth rates decline and real wages rise.
Read full textSylvester Petro critiques the Endangered Species Act and the concept of animal rights as a form of covert aggression against private property. He argues that rights are a human construct based on rational exchange and mutual duties, which animals are incapable of participating in. He contends that the best protection for the environment is the right of private property, as owners have a natural incentive to care for and improve their land, whereas collective or state ownership leads to mismanagement.
Read full textPaul D. Kamenar details the case of John Pozsgai, who was sentenced to three years in prison for placing clean topsoil on his own property, which the EPA classified as a 'wetland.' The essay highlights the erosion of property rights under environmental regulations like the Clean Water Act. Kamenar argues that overzealous bureaucrats are criminalizing productive activity and that the definition of 'wetlands' has been expanded beyond reason to facilitate federal land-use control.
Read full textElizabeth Larson compares the success of elephant conservation in Zimbabwe, which utilizes private property rights and economic incentives for local villagers, with the failure of state-managed, ban-centered policies in Kenya. She argues that the international ivory trade ban may actually harm elephants by removing the economic value that encourages local communities to protect them from poachers and habitat loss. The Zimbabwean model shows that when villagers profit from sustainable management, elephant populations thrive.
Read full textTibor Machan discusses the failure of collectivism and the emergence of environmentalism as a new justification for state control. Referencing Aristotle, Mises, and Garrett Hardin, he argues that the 'tragedy of the commons' is caused by a lack of private property rights. He critiques Robert Heilbroner's suggestion that the ecological crisis requires a move away from capitalism, asserting instead that a healthy environment is best achieved through the protection of individual rights and the market order.
Read full textGeorge Reisman presents a comprehensive critique of the environmental movement, labeling it as a form of nihilism that hates human life and reason. He argues that the movement's core premise—the 'intrinsic value' of nature—is used to negate human values and dismantle industrial civilization. Reisman defends the Industrial Revolution as the means by which man improves his environment through the use of man-made power. He dismisses various environmental scares (Alar, global warming, ozone depletion) as pseudo-science designed to instill fear and justify state control. He concludes that the solution to environmental concerns lies in capitalism, private property, and a return to the philosophical values of reason as championed by Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises.
Read full textRobert James Bidinotto analyzes the philosophical roots of the environmental movement, distinguishing between 'Deep Ecologists' (who seek to obliterate modern society) and 'Greens' (who seek to control it through socialism). He critiques the concepts of 'biospheric egalitarianism' and 'animal rights' as being fundamentally at odds with human nature and reason. Bidinotto also examines the manipulation of scientific data regarding global warming and other scares to justify massive government intervention and the 'insurance policy' ruse used to bypass the need for evidence.
Read full textThomas J. DiLorenzo introduces the argument that socialism, rather than the profit motive of free enterprise, is the primary cause of severe environmental degradation. He points to the catastrophic pollution levels in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe as evidence that state control fails to protect the environment.
Read full textThis section examines the severe environmental degradation in the Soviet Union, attributing it to the 'tragedy of the commons' inherent in socialist systems where property is government-owned. It details catastrophic damage to the Black Sea, the shrinking of the Aral and Caspian seas, and the extreme pollution of Lake Baikal and major rivers like the Volga. The author argues that the Soviet production ethic prioritized economic growth at any cost, leading to a lack of public accountability and the destruction of vast natural resources.
Read full textAn overview of the environmental 'nightmare' left by communist regimes in China and Eastern Europe. In China, air pollution and the 'Great Leap Forward' led to massive forest death and soil infertility. In Poland and Czechoslovakia, industrial dust, acid rain, and toxic waste have caused severe health crises, including high rates of respiratory disease and birth defects. The section highlights how central planning and the lack of private property rights resulted in the destruction of forests, rivers, and entire towns across the Eastern Bloc.
Read full textThis segment challenges the idea that democratic processes prevent public sector pollution by examining the United States government's own environmental record. It identifies the Department of Defense as a leading producer of hazardous waste and notes the EPA's limited enforcement power over other federal agencies. Examples include the toxic Rocky Mountain Arsenal, the Tennessee Valley Authority's resistance to clean air standards, and federal agricultural policies that encourage soil erosion.
Read full textThis section argues that environmental harm is not caused by free enterprise but by the failure of legal institutions to enforce property rights. It critiques the Progressive Era for weakening individual rights in favor of perceived public interest and advocates for a return to English common law traditions. The text identifies the 'tragedy of the commons' as the primary driver of pollution in socialist systems and public lands, concluding that sound liability laws and private property are the essential pillars of environmental protection.
Read full textA list of 23 citations supporting the previous discussion on environmental degradation, specifically referencing Soviet pollution, Eastern European industrial filth, and American legal transformations.
Read full textLawrence W. Reed argues that private property is the most effective tool for environmental conservation, contrasting it with the neglect often found in 'public' property. He provides detailed case studies of private organizations like The Nature Conservancy and the National Audubon Society, demonstrating how they use market mechanisms and ownership to protect ecologically significant areas more effectively than government mandates.
Read full textThis segment details eight specific examples of private conservation initiatives. It covers The Nature Conservancy's real estate approach, the National Audubon Society's management of the Rainey Sanctuary (including compatible oil drilling), for-profit conservation at Sea Lion Caves, multiple-use timber management in North Maine Woods, and innovative livestock/wildlife integration at Deseret Land & Livestock. It also touches on 'debt-for-nature' swaps by Conservation International and the work of Ducks Unlimited and Trout Unlimited.
Read full textDon Leal explores how water markets and transferable property rights can solve water shortages and improve environmental quality in the American West. He critiques the 'iron triangle' of federal water projects and the Bureau of Reclamation's historical role in subsidizing waste. The essay advocates for allowing private ownership of instream flows to protect fish habitats and warns that the 'public trust doctrine' threatens to undermine the property rights necessary for efficient water trading.
Read full textJ. Brian Phillips discusses the rise of aquaculture (fish farming) as a free-market solution to the depletion of ocean fisheries caused by the 'tragedy of the commons.' He explains how government subsidies and lack of ownership lead to overfishing, whereas aquaculture provides incentives for conservation through private ownership. The text also explores mariculture (fish ranching) and the legal hurdles regarding property rights in open waters, while addressing environmentalist concerns and regulatory obstacles.
Read full textCharles W. Baird challenges the notion of a 'garbage crisis,' arguing that perceived shortages in disposal capacity are the result of faulty government policy rather than physical limits. He advocates for the privatization of landfills and incinerators to ensure liability and proper pricing. Baird critiques mandatory recycling as often being cost-inefficient and 'anti-green,' defends the use of plastics and aseptic packaging based on their lower environmental impact, and suggests that market-based 'pay-as-you-throw' fees are the best way to manage waste.
Read full textGary North applies biblical principles from Exodus to the problem of pollution, arguing that private property and personal liability are the foundations of both capitalism and environmental protection. He discusses the 'tragedy of the commons' in the context of common ownership and uses the biblical law of fire to establish a framework for pollution restitution. North introduces concepts like the 'pollution easement' and argues that known pollution is often accounted for in land price discounts, while emphasizing that judges must use biblical standards to adjudicate social costs and benefits.
Read full textConcludes the discussion on biblical principles of pollution control by critiquing humanistic economics for its inability to solve the problem of subjective utility. It provides a comprehensive list of footnotes referencing works by Gary North, Garrett Hardin, J. H. Dales, and F. A. Harper regarding property rights and environmental policy.
Read full textHans Sennholz argues that the environmental crisis is primarily a failure of government rather than private enterprise. He identifies government-operated utilities, public sewer systems, and subsidized highways as the leading sources of pollution. Sennholz critiques zoning laws and the deterioration of public transport while advocating for the restoration of strict private property rights and the elimination of government subsidies to polluters as the primary solutions to environmental degradation.
Read full textLeonard Read distinguishes between 'preservation' (retention undisturbed) and 'conservation' (the wise use of resources for the best interests of man). He argues that the free market is a more effective conservator than government, citing examples from private timberland management and private recreational areas like Disneyland compared to government-run parks. Read emphasizes that both monetary and psychic profits drive individuals to manage resources efficiently and aesthetically when government does not pre-empt private action.
Read full textA comprehensive index for the 'Man and Nature' anthology, followed by a price list for The Freeman Classics series and a brief history of the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE).
Read full text