Amonn’s essay is a methodological reflection on the relation between economics and philosophy. It does not offer a technical model of economic behavior, but clarifies the foundations of Nationalökonomie: its object, its scientific status, its use of concepts such as law and value, and its unavoidable relation to ethical judgment. Economics becomes a specialized discipline by isolating economic facts, yet Amonn insists that its deepest questions still arise from broader philosophical reflection on human life, social order, and practical reason.
A central concern is the concept of value. Amonn does not treat valuation merely as a catalogue of approved goods; he asks how valuation itself is structured. This shifts attention from moral assertion to the formal conditions under which economic choices, rankings, and preferences become intelligible.
Das Wesentliche ist nicht, was bewertet wird, sondern wie das, was bewertet wird, bewertet wird.
English translation: What is essential is not what is valued, but how that which is valued is valued.
This formulation allows Amonn to connect economics with philosophy without dissolving economics into moral doctrine. Economic science analyzes ordered relations among wants, means, and choices; philosophy clarifies the presuppositions of such analysis. The point is not that economics should preach values, but that it cannot understand economic action while ignoring the evaluative forms through which action is organized.
Amonn also defines the scientific ambition of economics through the notion of lawlike connection. Science is more than description; it seeks strict relations among facts. Yet economics cannot simply imitate physics, because its phenomena are bound up with purposes, institutions, expectations, and human evaluations.
Unter einem „Gesetz“ bezeichnet man in der Wissenschaft einen strengen, inneren Zusammenhang zwischen zwei Tatsachen kausaler oder funktionaler Natur, zwischen zwei zeitlich aufeinanderfolgenden oder gleichzeitigen Tatsachen.
English translation: By a "law" one designates in science a strict, inner connection between two facts of causal or functional nature, between two facts that are temporally successive or simultaneous.
Economic laws, on this view, are possible where regular causal or functional connections can be identified within economic life. But their validity depends on conceptual clarity and on awareness of the conditions under which human action produces regularities. Amonn’s philosophical method therefore guards economics both against loose moralizing and against a naïve naturalism that would forget the distinctive character of social phenomena.
His treatment of self-interest illustrates this balance. Amonn rejects the assumption that economic egoism is automatically morally corrupt. In market exchange, self-interest can function as a coordinating principle rather than merely as vice. The ethical question is not whether actors pursue their own advantage at all, but how this pursuit is institutionally ordered and normatively constrained.
Der Eigennutz im Wirtschaftsverkehr ist also keineswegs ein ethisch verwerfliches Prinzip.
English translation: Self-interest in economic intercourse is thus by no means an ethically reprehensible principle.
This is not a defense of greed as an ultimate norm. It is an analytic distinction: economics must understand how self-interest operates before moral philosophy or policy can judge its limits. A social order may use self-interest productively while still requiring law, custom, and ethical standards to prevent exploitation or disorder.
The practical culmination of the essay lies in the relation between justice and expediency. Amonn refuses both technocratic efficiency and abstract moral absolutism. Economic arrangements must be judged by normative standards, but they must also be feasible under real social and material constraints.
Es kommt auf eine optimale Kombination von Gerechtigkeit und Zweckmäßigkeit an.
English translation: What matters is an optimal combination of justice and expediency.
This sentence condenses the essay’s anti-utopian realism. Justice remains indispensable, but it cannot be applied as if scarcity, incentives, institutional limits, and conflicting claims did not exist. Conversely, expediency cannot be allowed to become a substitute for justice. The task of economic policy is mediation: to design arrangements that are workable while remaining answerable to ethical judgment.
Amonn’s enduring contribution is this disciplined mediation between philosophical reflection and economic science. He rejects a purely technical economics severed from questions of value, justice, and human purpose; he also rejects a moral philosophy that ignores economic law, scarcity, and institutional feasibility. Nationalökonomie is therefore a science of ordered economic relations, but one whose basic concepts require philosophical clarification and whose applications require ethical evaluation. Its rigor depends not on escaping philosophy, but on knowing precisely where philosophical assumptions enter economic thought.
This work was divided into 88 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 88 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian