
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk · 1889
Böhm-Bawerk’s constructive sequel to his history of interest theories treats capital, production, value, and interest as one connected problem. The point is not simply that capital increases physical output; that fact alone cannot explain why a surplus of value regularly appears. The book therefore makes interest, rather than capital in the abstract, its organizing question.
Das Schwergewicht derselben liegt in der Theorie des Kapitalzinses.
English translation: Its center of gravity lies in the theory of capital-interest.
The opening books derive capital from production’s temporal form. Human labor does not create matter but redirects natural forces, and production becomes “capitalistic” when it reaches consumption goods through indirect stages. Tools, raw materials, buildings, and unfinished goods are not final enjoyments but intermediate products that make later enjoyments more abundant or better. Hence social capital is neither land, labor, all durable goods, nor a mere fund of value.
Das Kapital aber ist nichts anderes als der Inbegriff der Zwischenprodukte, die auf den einzelnen Etappen des ausholenden Umweges zur Entstehung kommen.
English translation: Capital, however, is nothing other than the totality of the intermediate products that come into existence at the individual stages of the roundabout way of production.
This definition lets Böhm-Bawerk separate social or productive capital from private or acquisition capital. A rental house, workers’ subsistence, or loaned sum may yield income to an owner, yet that private income does not by itself define capital’s social function. The concept must be fixed by production’s technical sequence, not by legal ownership or revenue. Capital is therefore not an elementary factor beside labor and nature, but their produced intermediate embodiment. Saving is necessary because resources must be released from immediate consumption if longer methods are to be undertaken, but saving is not itself a moral title to interest.
Book III turns to value because interest is a value phenomenon. Böhm-Bawerk’s marginal utility theory defines subjective value as the importance of a good for welfare under scarcity. Its magnitude depends on the least important satisfaction still secured by the available supply; this rule extends from consumers’ goods to complementary goods, higher-order goods, and costs.
Der Werth eines Gutes bestimmt sich nach der Größe seines Grenznutzens.
English translation: The value of a good is determined by the magnitude of its marginal utility.
Costs do not independently determine value; they transmit marginal utility through the alternative uses of productive goods. Competitive price is likewise explained by the subjective valuations of buyers and sellers, with the limits set by marginal pairs. This prepares the decisive step: interest is a price phenomenon arising because present and future goods of the same kind and number are not valued equally.
Gegenwärtige Güter sind in aller Regel mehr werth als künftige Güter gleicher Art und Zahl.
English translation: Present goods are, as a rule, worth more than future goods of the same kind and number.
Böhm-Bawerk explains this premium on present goods by three causes. Present wants may be more urgent than future wants; people often underrate future needs through weak imagination, weak will, and uncertainty; and present goods possess technical superiority because they can be employed sooner in longer, more productive roundabout processes. Physical productivity is thus retained, but only as one source of intertemporal valuation. Interest is not the mere product of capital, not payment for a separable “use” of consumable goods, and not essentially a deduction from labor’s product.
The loan displays the principle most clearly: present goods are exchanged for future goods plus an agio. Enterprise profit follows the same logic, since wages, materials, land services, and unfinished products are economically future goods until the completed product matures. Durable goods and land are also valued as discounted streams of future services. Against socialist exploitation theories, Böhm-Bawerk concedes that distress, monopoly, and unequal ownership can produce unjust gains, but he denies that they explain the category of interest. Even a socialist community advancing present subsistence for products completed later would confront the same difference between present and future value.
The final theory of the rate treats the market for present goods as a special case of general price formation. Supply is the social subsistence fund; demand comes from workers, entrepreneurs, consumption borrowers, landowners, and capitalists’ own consumption. Equilibrium depends on the absorption of labor and present goods and on the marginal extension of the production period. Larger funds and thrift tend to lower interest, while more workers, richer technical opportunities, or stronger underestimation of the future tend to raise it. The book’s core synthesis is that capital is embodied roundabout production, and interest is the price of present command over goods in a world where waiting is productive but costly.
This work was divided into 100 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 100 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian