Karlheinz Muhr Library

The Complete “Austrian School of Economics” Collection


© 2026 Karlheinz Muhr Library·Conceptualized, designed & built bykrin.ai↗
Karlheinz Muhr Library
ArchiveTimelineLibrarian
Sign in
Archive/Friedrich August von Hayek
Sozialistische Wirtschaftsrechnung III: Wiedereinführung des Wettbewerbs

Friedrich August von Hayek · 1940

Sozialistische Wirtschaftsrechnung III: Wiedereinführung des Wettbewerbs

6 sections
Ask about this book

About this work

Sozialistische Wirtschaftsrechnung III: Wiedereinführung des Wettbewerbs

This German volume section belongs to the multi-contributor socialist-calculation debate and is organized as the third chapter in a sequence of arguments. Hayek frames the stage under review; Oskar Lange, Fred M. Taylor, and H. D. Dickinson supply the principal competitive-socialist proposals; Mises, Pareto, Barone, Maurice Dobb, K. Tisch, and others form the surrounding cast of predecessors, critics, and respondents. The chapter sequence moves from calculation in kind and mathematical-equilibrium schemes to the attempt to restore competition inside a socialist order.

Zwei Kapitel in der Diskussion der sozialistischen Wirtschaft können nun als abgeschlossen betrachtet werden.

English translation: Two chapters in the discussion of the socialist economy may now be regarded as closed.

Hayek's organizing claim is that the newer socialist chapters accept more than earlier proposals admitted. Lange/Taylor and Dickinson retain consumer choice, some occupational freedom, cost-accounting rules, and competition among production units; yet they place prices for producer goods in a central planning board or supreme economic council. The resulting system is hybrid: its contributors concede the need for market-like feedback, but ask an authority to announce and revise the crucial signals by observing shortages and surpluses. Hayek therefore treats the calculation problem as an institutional problem about discovery, reporting, and adjustment.

The chapter's treatment of Pareto and equilibrium equations defines the work's architecture. Hayek grants that socialist and capitalist economies can be described by similar formal relationships; his objection is that such relationships do not generate the knowledge needed to act. The mathematical chapter of the debate is closed because knowing that equations exist differs from collecting the data, solving the equations, and revising decisions under changing conditions.

Mit anderen Worten, wenn man wirklich alle diese Gleichungen wissen könnte, so wäre das einzige Mittel, das den menschlichen Kräften zu ihrer Lösung zur Verfügung stünde, die praktische Lösung zu beobachten, die der Markt vornimmt.

English translation: In other words, even if one really could know all these equations, the only means available to human powers for their solution would be to observe the practical solution that the market carries out.

In the Lange/Taylor material, managers are instructed to equate price and marginal cost while the central board changes prices by trial and error. Dickinson's parallel chapter assigns similar functions to a central economic council. Hayek groups these contributors together through a practical objection: their models presuppose stable categories, timely reports, and standardized goods. Real production, especially capital goods, is heterogeneous, local, and constantly changing; ships, factories, machines, and special equipment cannot be priced as if they were repeat retail items. The decisive issue is therefore speed and completeness of adjustment, not abstract convergence.

Das praktische Problem ist nicht, ob eine bestimmte Methode schließlich zu einem hypothetischen Gleichgewicht führen würde, sondern welche Methode die raschere und vollständigere Anpassung an die sich täglich ändernden Bedingungen an den verschiedenen Orten und in den verschiedenen Industrien sichert.

English translation: The practical problem is not whether a given method would ultimately lead to a hypothetical equilibrium, but which method secures the more rapid and complete adjustment to the daily changing conditions in the various places and in the various industries.

The institutional sections then turn to management, entry, and responsibility. Managers in competitive socialism may be ordered to minimize costs, but they cannot freely bid for resources, undercut rivals, or risk capital as entrepreneurs do. Hayek stresses that low-cost methods are discovered through rivalry and entry, not merely through obedience to rules. Lange and Dickinson therefore appear as architects of quasi-competition: they retain competitive symptoms while weakening the mechanisms that make competition informative.

The concluding movement links calculation to political order. If the state owns capital and controls investment, the authority must decide which manager receives resources, which plans deserve expansion, and how losses are interpreted. Responsibility rises upward, and economic judgement becomes administrative judgement. As a contribution to the broader socialist-calculation collection, "Wiedereinführung des Wettbewerbs" functions as review, synthesis, and criticism: it places Lange, Taylor, and Dickinson at the center of market-socialist reconstruction, while Hayek shifts the question from whether socialism can state equilibrium conditions to whether it can reproduce free price formation, entrepreneurial entry, capital responsibility, and decentralized adaptation.

Sections

This work was divided into 6 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.

  1. 1Sections 1–3: Socialist Calculation Debate and Critique of Central Price Adjustment▾
  2. 2Sections 4–5: Proposed Planning Apparatus and Defects of Official Prices▾
  3. 3Section 6: Industrial Units, Marginal-Cost Rules, and Price Competition▾
  4. 4Section 7: Managerial Responsibility, Forecasting, and Bureaucracy▾
  5. 5Section 8: Investment, Capital Allocation, and Quasi-Competition▾
  6. 6Sections 9–10: Freedom, Totalitarian Planning, and Concluding Assessment▾

Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 6 sections and cites the passage.

Ask the Librarian