Eugen Philippovich von Philippsberg · 1909
Philippovich’s fourth edition of the Grundriss presents Volkswirtschaftspolitik as a science of policy in historical movement rather than a list of state interventions. Its division into agrarian, industrial, and foreign-trade policy reflects a broader inquiry into how production, organization, law, and income are reshaped by modern institutions. The preface makes this methodological point explicitly: economic policy must be grasped where rules, markets, associations, technology, and social ideals continually alter one another.
Es ist eben dieses in stetem Flüsse, was hier dargestellt werden soll.
English translation: It is precisely this—being in constant flux—which is to be presented here.
The work’s central argument is that economic policy consists in deliberate action by organized collectivities within economic development. The state is the strongest of these because it commands law, administration, taxation, and coercive authority, but Philippovich also treats cooperatives, unions, chambers, cartels, banks, and professional associations as genuine makers of economic order. He therefore rejects both laissez-faire individualism and absolute statism. Freedom is not produced simply by abstention from regulation, since poverty, dependence, and market power can themselves become coercive. Policy is justified where it makes freedom institutionally real. Its standard is welfare-oriented yet production-centered: redistribution cannot replace productive capacity, and production depends on property, credit, education, labor organization, and legal form.
Das allgemeine Ziel der Volkswirtschaftspolitik ist: reichlichste, mannigfaltigste und nachhaltigste Güterversorgung für Alle mit dem geringst möglichen Aufwand an Arbeitsmühe.
English translation: The general aim of economic policy is: the most abundant, most varied, and most sustainable provision of goods for all, with the least possible expenditure of labor effort.
The agrarian section develops this institutional realism historically. Peasant emancipation destroyed feudal dues, services, divided ownership, and lordly jurisdiction, thereby opening the way for initiative and more intensive cultivation; yet Philippovich does not portray it as an uncomplicated liberal triumph, because it also stripped rural households of older securities and exposed them to market risk, debt, and misfortune. Farm size is therefore judged economically, not ideologically. Large estates may use capital and technique effectively, but small and medium farms often possess advantages in care, family labor, livestock intensity, and local knowledge. Latifundia are damaging where they prevent settlement, while dwarf holdings are damaging where they generalize poverty, though they can survive beside industry or in intensive cultivation. His answer is not a single property model but adaptive institutions: tenancy reform, inheritance law, Rentengüter, inner colonization, agricultural chambers, land improvement, insurance, rural credit, and especially cooperatives that let smaller farms share selected economies of scale. Rural labor policy likewise must do more than restrain migration; it must make village life socially and culturally viable through holdings, welfare, education, participation, and communal institutions.
The industrial section follows the movement from guild regulation through Gewerbefreiheit to factory production, house industry, craft adaptation, joint-stock enterprise, cartels, trusts, banks, and organized labor. Its decisive claim is that formal contractual liberty no longer describes the real relation between employer and worker.
Der freie Arbeitsvertrag ist eine Fiktion.
English translation: The free labor contract is a fiction.
Because modern labor conditions are collective, real freedom requires collective institutions: unions, employer associations, tariff agreements, works councils, labor chambers, arbitration, inspection, and labor courts. These forms do not abolish enterprise but democratize the formation and interpretation of working conditions. Labor protection—limits on hours, Sunday rest, safety, hygiene, and restrictions on child, female, and home work—is defended both as minimum protection and as cultural policy, preventing competition from being based on exhaustion rather than productivity.
The foreign-trade section treats external commerce as national production policy. Philippovich refuses to assimilate it to ordinary domestic exchange because firms act within nationally shaped systems of law, money, taxation, education, administration, and labor mobility. This premise leads neither to automatic protectionism nor to simple free trade. Free trade promises cheaper supply and competitive discipline; protection may educate productive forces or preserve indispensable branches, but it also burdens consumers, strengthens rents and cartels, and provokes retaliation.
Die Schutzzölle müssen ihrem Zwecke nach vertheuernd wirken
English translation: By their very purpose, protective tariffs must have a price-raising effect.
This work was divided into 252 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 252 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian