Hans F. Sennholz’s Death and Taxes, introduced by John W. Robbins, treats federal estate and gift taxation as a central symptom of the modern fiscal state. Robbins frames the issue against socialist hostility to inheritance, but Sennholz’s argument is chiefly economic: death taxes consume capital, disrupt enterprise, and weaken the productivity that raises wages and softens material inequality.
"Taxes touch nearly every aspect of human life"
The introduction places estate taxation within the expansion of federal spending and political management. Taxation has ceased to be only a means of financing limited government; it now serves regulation, redistribution, stabilization, and social reconstruction. Sennholz contrasts equality before law with a newer demand for economic equality enforced by progressive levies. Death taxes therefore test whether property is a protected right or a temporary concession revocable at death.
His first chapter grounds property in production and exchange rather than state permission. Conquest may let rulers appear as original owners, but in a market order wealth arises through saving, investment, contract, and service to consumers. Government’s proper function is juridical and protective, not creative or confiscatory.
"Government no longer is the creator of property; it is merely the protector of valuable rights and interests."
This premise leads Sennholz to reinterpret large fortunes. They are not mainly hoards for luxury consumption; they are farms, factories, inventories, financial claims, contracts, and business organizations. Owners preserve wealth only by directing resources toward consumer wants. Profit, executive pay, thrift, and inheritance are thus treated as parts of a production system that coordinates capital and labor. Poverty and unemployment, by contrast, are aggravated when law obstructs labor markets or depletes the capital fund through wage controls, union privilege, transfer policy, inflation, and confiscatory taxation.
"Private ownership thus becomes a production function."
The historical chapters trace federal death duties from temporary wartime measures to the permanent estate tax of 1916 and its later steep progression. Sennholz reads this development as both fiscal history and intellectual history. Henry George, institutionalism, socialism, and progressive reform helped recast inherited property as unearned privilege. The estate tax survives, in his view, less because it supplies indispensable revenue than because it expresses moralized resentment toward accumulated capital.
Against the claim that death duties are painless, Sennholz argues that both predecessor and successor bear them. The predecessor anticipates the levy and alters labor, saving, risk-taking, retirement, charitable giving, incorporation, and succession planning. The successor receives a reduced or illiquid estate and may be forced to sell productive assets when continuity is most fragile. Widows, family firms, and farms become central examples because the tax can fracture working capital and managerial succession.
Inherited wealth, Sennholz insists, remains subject to market discipline. Capable heirs preserve capital by serving consumers; incapable heirs dissipate it. Estate taxation interrupts this test by compelling sales and reorganizations before entrepreneurial judgment can operate. Around the levy grows an expensive administrative world of lawyers, accountants, trusts, foundations, insurance devices, and avoidance schemes, which he treats as capital and talent diverted from production.
Inflation receives special emphasis because it silently expands the tax. Rising nominal values lift ordinary businesses and farms above exemptions, transform paper appreciation into taxable wealth, and push estates into higher brackets without explicit legislative action.
"Inflation and tax progression are pushing all estates towards the top rate of taxation."
The book culminates in Sennholz’s principle of inequality. The decisive contrast is not morally defined rich against poor, but capital-rich against capital-poor societies. Abundant capital raises labor productivity and narrows practical class differences; capital consumption lowers wages and increases dependence on political privilege. Progressive estate taxation is therefore, for Sennholz, not an equalizer but an engine of class rigidity.
This work was divided into 32 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 32 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian