Debts and Deficits is Sennholz’s Austrian-libertarian indictment of Reagan-era fiscal policy and of the transfer-state assumptions behind it. The book argues that public debt is not a neutral bookkeeping device but a political means of shifting present consumption onto future taxpayers, consuming productive capital, and hiding the costs of redistribution. Deficits, inflation, entitlements, and bureaucratic expansion are treated as linked expressions of a society that wants public benefits without private sacrifice.
To live beyond its means is to invite poverty and deprivation in the end.
This maxim gives the work its moral structure. Sennholz rejects the idea that governments escape the limits binding households and firms. Political rhetoric may describe borrowing as stimulus, redistribution as justice, and expenditure as social investment, but he insists that the underlying economic reality is forgone saving, reduced capital formation, and a weaker productive order. The deficit is therefore both an economic symptom and a civic one: voters denounce debt in general while defending the particular subsidies, programs, and protections from which they benefit.
Part One presents the federal budget as the institutional form of this contradiction. Rather than an exercise in economic calculation, it becomes a contest among organized interests seeking income through law. Congress multiplies local favors, agencies defend and enlarge their jurisdictions, and presidents invoke public purposes to justify spending that cannot be financed honestly through taxation.
The federal budget is permeated by the notions and doctrines of “higher objectives.”
Sennholz’s treatment of Social Security, welfare, farm programs, education subsidies, and foreign aid turns on the difference between voluntary charity and coercive transfer. The Good Samaritan gives his own property; the welfare state commands the property of others. In this sense, redistribution does not simply express compassion. It politicizes need, creates permanent classes of claimants and taxpayers, and weakens the habits of self-reliance on which a free economy depends.
The chapters on “underground government,” off-budget agencies, and federal credit programs extend the critique beyond the visible budget. Public enterprises and government-sponsored credit allow officials to evade ordinary fiscal restraints while continuing to allocate resources politically. Sennholz is especially critical of the claim that public debt is harmless because citizens “owe it to themselves.”
Government debt differs fundamentally from private debt.
Private borrowing normally rests on calculation, risk, and expected repayment from future production. Public borrowing rests on taxation, inflation, or repudiation. It creates compulsory future claims on income and, when taxes become politically intolerable, encourages monetary expansion. Debt and inflation thus become related forms of concealed expropriation: one postpones the burden, the other erodes the unit in which repayment is made. Sennholz’s comparisons with earlier credit booms serve an Austrian warning that easy money delays adjustment, stimulates speculation, and magnifies the eventual crisis.
Part Two examines proposed remedies and finds procedural reform insufficient. Privatization is real only when assets are sold at market prices and removed from political control; contracting-out, vouchers, regulated sales, and loan transfers may merely make the transfer state more efficient. Likewise, a line-item veto or balanced-budget amendment cannot impose discipline if citizens still demand benefits for which they will not pay.
No political regulation, law, or amendment can impose integrity on people who prefer profuseness, dependence, and debt.
The critique of taxation and of Reagan’s presidency sharpens this point. Higher taxes do not cure deficits if they feed additional spending while discouraging production. Reagan becomes, for Sennholz, a revealing figure: a president rhetorically committed to thrift and limited government who nevertheless presides over expanding federal obligations. The failure is not merely personal or partisan but cultural, rooted in democratic demand for transfer payments and political reluctance to confront their costs.
The book’s closing argument is reformist but not technocratic. Sennholz calls for exposing the real character of compulsory entitlement systems, applying means tests, allowing exits from mandated programs, respecting conscientious objection, and rebuilding public opinion around thrift, property, and responsibility. Its lasting claim is that fiscal disorder cannot be solved by accounting devices alone. Debt is capital consumption; entitlement is political conflict over income; inflation is disguised default; and durable reform requires moral limits as much as budgetary ones.
This work was divided into 63 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 63 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian