Richard von Strigl · 1937
Strigl’s article is an institutional diagnosis of Austrian economic education rather than a doctrinal survey. Its central thesis is that Austrian universities possessed high-quality economists and a living intellectual tradition, but that economics long remained structurally subordinated to legal studies. The decisive question is not whether economics was taught, but where it was placed in the curriculum, under what examination pressures, and through what forms of student work.
l'enseignement économique, rattaché exclusivement aux facultés de droit, n'occupait, dans les programmes d'enseignement juridique, qu'une place peu saillante.
English translation: economic instruction, attached exclusively to the faculties of law, occupied only a minor place in the programs of legal education.
The essay first reconstructs the older legal curriculum: two study periods, three state examinations, and an economics component embedded in the public-law examination. In principle students received instruction in economic theory, economic policy, and public finance. In practice, Strigl argues, the timing was pedagogically damaging: economics came late, just as students were preparing for examinations, especially the judicial one. The result was a narrowing of purpose. Instead of becoming an independent field of inquiry, economics risked being reduced to
une simple « matière d'examen ».
English translation: a mere "examination subject."
Strigl’s most important conceptual move is to separate the quality of teaching from the institutional reach of teaching. He praises the economists of the Austrian School and insists that their tradition remained alive; the weakness lay in the curriculum’s capacity to draw ordinary students into sustained work. Thus eminent instruction could be deep without being broad:
l'action de ces maîtres de s'étendre autant en largeur qu'elle est allée en profondeur.
English translation: the influence of these masters extended as far in breadth as it went in depth.
Against the passive lecture model, Strigl emphasizes seminars, practical exercises, written reports, and discussion. Economic education, in his view, requires students to learn how to think and argue economically, not merely to absorb material. The seminar is valuable because it trains students to
exprimer clairement la pensée économique, de discerner des sophismes
English translation: to express economic thought clearly, to detect sophisms
The second part of the article explains the reform introduced for students beginning in 1935. Its crucial change was the division of study into three periods of three semesters, separating private-law preparation from the public-law and economics phase. Strigl regards this as a major improvement because it removes the old overlap between judicial preparation and economic study. The reform also makes exercises compulsory and introduces a first-cycle course in basic economic notions, not examined but intended to awaken curiosity. Its value lies in giving beginners
une première vue sur le domaine des études économiques.
English translation: a first overview of the field of economic studies.
The final sections place economics within Staatswissenschaft, specialized higher schools, and research institutions. Public-law studies give economics a more central role, including seminars and theses, but attract few students because they are longer and confer fewer career advantages than legal studies. Technical schools, agricultural schools, and especially the Vienna School of International Commerce provide additional economic instruction. The Austrian Institute for Business Cycle Research offers a bridge between theory and practical research.
Strigl closes by acknowledging that he has described formal arrangements rather than the content of economic science. Yet he treats the international reputation of Austrian scholarship as the strongest evidence for the universities’ intellectual vitality:
les travaux scientifiques de l'École autrichienne, au contraire, sont connus dans le monde entier.
English translation: the scientific works of the Austrian School, on the contrary, are known throughout the world.
The article’s relevance lies in showing how the fate of economic science depends on institutional design. For Strigl, economics flourishes when protected from exam congestion, linked but not absorbed into law, and supported by seminars that cultivate independent judgment.
This work was divided into 5 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 5 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian