Friedrich von Wieser · 1884
Wieser’s treatise gives a systematic theory of economic value from first principles: value is not an intrinsic property of goods, nor a substance created by labor or cost, but a subjective relation between persons, wants, scarcity, and means. Its central move is to relocate value from objects to judgment, while explaining why that judgment can still yield determinate economic laws.
Der Satz, dass der Werth in Wahrheit eine subjective Erscheinung sei, kann nicht eindringlich genug gefasst werden.
English translation: The proposition that value is in truth a subjective phenomenon cannot be grasped emphatically enough.
The methodological point is decisive. Wieser thinks political economy has often been misled by everyday “speech-concepts” that treat exchange value, cost value, or labor value as if they named independent objective magnitudes. A proper value doctrine must instead begin from the mental and practical fact that human beings rank satisfactions and attach importance to goods only insofar as possession or loss affects those satisfactions.
Die Werthdoctrin ist, wenn wir ihre Aufgabe richtig umschrieben haben, angewandte Psychologie.
English translation: The doctrine of value, if we have correctly circumscribed its task, is applied psychology.
This yields his basic definition: value is human interest conceived as a condition of goods. Goods are valuable not because usefulness alone inheres in them, but because scarcity makes particular quantities matter. A thing may be useful without being valuable if it is available in superabundance; value appears when the loss of a unit would force some want to go unsatisfied.
Der Werth, so haben wir festgestellt, ist ein menschliches Interesse, als Zustand der Güter gedacht.
English translation: Value, as we have established, is a human interest conceived as a condition of goods.
From here Wieser develops the marginal law. The value of a unit is not determined by the most intense want the whole stock could satisfy, but by the least important want still dependent on the available supply. Equal units of a homogeneous stock therefore receive equal value, and abundance lowers value because it pushes the dependent marginal satisfaction downward. This principle lets Wieser explain valuation without appealing to an objective value-substance.
He then extends the same reasoning to production and cost. Costs are not an alternative source of value; they are themselves values, arising because productive means have competing uses. The value of productive goods is imputed backward from the products and satisfactions they help secure. In this way Wieser turns cost theory into a branch of marginal utility theory: labor, capital goods, and materials matter economically because they stand in chains of dependence leading to future satisfactions.
The argument also recognizes limits and special cases. Where goods are separable and replaceable, ordinary marginal valuation governs. Where an entire stock, indispensable complement, or complex whole is threatened, valuation may reflect the significance of the larger satisfaction at risk rather than the last isolated unit. These complications do not abolish the marginal principle; they specify the conditions under which marginal reckoning applies.
Finally, Wieser gives the theory a social reach. Marginal value is not merely a feature of private exchange or capitalism. Any economy must compare wants, means, alternatives, and sacrifices; therefore any economy must in some form reckon by marginal significance.
Welche Wirthschaftsordnung auch gelten möge, ob diejenige, unter der wir gegenwärtig leben, ob eine socialistische, immer wird der Werth — der Grenzwerth — seine hervorragende Rolle in der Wirthschaft beibehalten.
English translation: Whatever economic order may prevail — whether the one under which we now live or a socialist one — value, namely marginal value, will always retain its preeminent role in economic life.
The treatise is thus a foundational Austrian statement of subjective value, marginal utility, and imputation. Its importance lies in showing how economic calculation can be rooted in individual want-satisfaction while still yielding general laws. Wieser’s “Werth” is neither price alone, nor labor embodied, nor a metaphysical quality of things, but the disciplined expression of human dependence on scarce means.
This work was divided into 34 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 34 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian