Hayek’s essay asks how the institutional virtues of the gold standard might be preserved without making gold itself the monetary anchor. Written amid wartime and postwar debates over managed currency, it begins by resisting the easy dismissal of gold. Hayek does not defend gold as naturally suited to money; he defends the rule-like effects that the gold standard once produced.
But there is some danger that the sweeping condemnation of it which is now the fashion may obscure the fact that it also had some important virtues which most of the alternatives lack.
The central distinction is between gold as a metal and gold as a mechanism. For Hayek, the old standard created something close to an international currency, restrained national discretion, and made monetary policy more predictable than schemes of purely domestic management. These advantages did not arise from any mystical property of gold but from the fact that gold supplied an automatic, internationally recognized rule.
It will be noticed that none of these points claimed in favor of the gold standard is directly connected with any property inherent to gold.
This separation allows Hayek to criticize gold while retaining the case for a commodity standard. His main objection is not that gold production is erratic, but that it responds too slowly to changes in monetary demand. When people want more liquidity, the gold system first produces deflationary pressure; only later does new mining add supplies, often after the need has passed. Gold therefore converts the demand for monetary reserves into delayed production of a comparatively useless commodity.
The really serious objection against gold is rather the slowness with which its supply adjusts itself to genuine changes in demand.
Hayek then turns to the commodity-reserve currency proposals associated with Benjamin Graham and Frank D. Graham. Their plan would replace a single metallic reserve with a fixed composite bundle of storable raw commodities, represented by warehouse warrants. Money would be issued against, and redeemable in, the complete commodity unit. The aggregate price of the bundle would be fixed, while individual commodity prices would remain free to adjust according to market conditions.
The importance of this design is that it changes the economic meaning of hoarding. Under ordinary monetary arrangements, an increased desire to hold money can withdraw purchasing power and leave resources idle. Under a commodity-reserve system, the same desire would lead to the accumulation of useful inventories of raw materials. In slump conditions, official purchases of the commodity unit would support demand for primary products; in recovery, sales from accumulated stocks would release materials and absorb money before commodity-price increases became destabilizing.
The hoarding of money, instead of causing resources to run to waste, would act as if it were an order to keep raw commodities for the hoarder’s account.
Hayek emphasizes that this is not a scheme for fixing all prices or centrally allocating raw materials. Its stabilizing object is the composite unit, not each constituent market. Nor does he imagine an elaborate discretionary bureaucracy. Private dealers could assemble and disassemble the relevant warrants, while the monetary authority would follow a buying-and-selling rule analogous to the old gold mechanism.
The later parts of the essay treat practical difficulties—storage, quality standards, the composition of the bundle, futures markets, and possible connections with gold—as problems of design rather than decisive objections. Hayek’s broader concern is institutional: if governments are likely to hold commodity reserves and intervene in raw-material markets, those activities should be governed by clear and general rules rather than by ad hoc administrative discretion.
The essay’s thesis is therefore conservative and innovative at once. It is conservative in seeking an international, predictable, rule-bound monetary order; it is innovative in detaching that order from gold and attaching it instead to a diversified reserve of useful commodities. Hayek’s commodity-reserve currency is meant to preserve the best features of the gold standard while avoiding its waste, rigidity, and delayed adjustment.
This work was divided into 7 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 7 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian