This file is a short memorial essay or obituary. Rothbard’s scope is deliberately intimate: he does not attempt a full biography of Margit von Mises, but commemorates her as widow, guardian of Ludwig von Mises’s legacy, social center of the Misesian circle, and living remnant of prewar Viennese culture. Its main thesis is that Margit’s significance lay not merely in her marriage to Mises but in her active preservation and moral defense of his work, and in the personal qualities—intelligence, elegance, loyalty, and principled independence—that made that preservation possible.
Rothbard opens with age and decline only to reject any sentimental reduction of Margit to frailty. His portrait insists on force of mind and social command; the memorial’s first conceptual move is to make vitality, not death, the governing frame.
While physically frail the last few years, Margit remained mentally alert until a few months before her death.
This emphasis on alertness prepares the essay’s central claim: after Ludwig’s death, Margit became an agent of intellectual continuity. Rothbard’s phrase “Mises industry” is affectionate but precise. It names a practical labor of publication, translation, reprinting, institutional work, and reputational defense.
After the death of her beloved Lu, Margit swung into action, to become an indefatigable one-woman “Mises industry.”
Margit is thus presented as an archivist, editor, organizer, and combatant. Rothbard’s admiration is not passive; he values her refusal to let Mises be softened, appropriated, or diminished by friends as well as opponents.
She refused to let any slighting or denigration of Mises by his genuine or less-than-genuine admirers or disciples go unremarked or go unchastised.
The essay then turns from institutional work to literary memory. Margit’s memoir, My Years with Ludwig von Mises, is treated as her “greatest achievement” in this work of preservation because it keeps alive not only doctrines but persons, manners, and a marriage. Rothbard contrasts formal biography with witness from within.
It is notable that, unlike necessarily stiff and formal biographies from outside observers, the memory of both Lu and Margit will be kept eternally alive in this lovely valentine to a devoted marriage.
A second major movement of the piece reconstructs the domestic setting of that memory: the Upper West Side apartment where Margit and Ludwig lived from 1942, filled with mementos, conversation, food, and visits to Mises’s study. Rothbard treats the apartment almost as an institution, a place where the Misesian movement’s friendships and loyalties were sustained. The names he lists—Fertig, Hazlitt, Matthews, Cortney, Shutz—make the memorial also a miniature sociology of Austrian-liberal intellectual life in exile.
The third movement enlarges Margit from widow and hostess into symbol. Her stamina, her walking, her beauty, her background as an actress, and her standard of “elegance” all connect her to a vanished Viennese world. Rothbard’s description is nostalgic, but the nostalgia has argumentative force: Old Vienna stands for formed character, manners, independence, and seriousness before the compromises of contemporary ideological fashion.
Margit von Mises was the last of the Austrians, the last vestige of Old Vienna.
The essay’s treatment of marriage is similarly polemical. Rothbard does not present Margit as self-effacing. On the contrary, he stresses that she was among the strongest-minded women known to her friends. Her devotion to Ludwig is therefore not submission but chosen fidelity, a disciplined partnership around person, memory, and ideas.
Margit and Ludwig von Mises were a magnificent team.
This allows Rothbard to dismiss contemporary clichés about “family values” and “feminism” as inadequate to the case before him. The Mises marriage matters because it embodied a unity of affection, principle, and intellectual mission that outlived Ludwig himself. Margit’s work after 1973 is the proof of that unity.
The closing paragraphs make the memorial explicitly normative. Rothbard sets Lu and Margit against an age of conformity and “politically correct” status-seeking. Their relevance lies in their refusal of compromise, their fidelity to conviction, and their example to later defenders of freedom and free markets.
Lu and Margit were of a different and far nobler cloth and of a different age.
The essay ends not with private grief alone but with a charge to remembrance. To honor Margit is to preserve the persons, institutions, and principles through which Mises’s legacy survived. Rothbard’s final judgment is elegiac and communal: her death diminishes not only those who loved her, but the moral atmosphere of the movement she helped sustain.
The death of Margit von Mises, yes even at age 102, leaves us all poorer and diminished in spirit.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian