Karel Engliš’s biographical encyclopedia entry, originally published in 1934 and republished in 1937, presents Alois Rašín (1867–1923) as an architect of Czechoslovak financial independence whose political character and violent death helped make fiscal discipline a national ideal. It moves from political biography through monetary reconstruction to an assessment of Rašín’s economic convictions and legacy. Its central tension lies between admiration for his organizing power and reservations about the narrowness and harshness of his methods.
The opening traces Rašín’s passage from Czech opposition politics to leadership in the new republic. Trained for the bar in Prague, he was imprisoned for participation in the Omladina movement, entered the Reichsrath as a Young Czech representative in 1911, and received a wartime death sentence for high treason, subsequently commuted to imprisonment. Amnesty in 1917 preceded his emergence as a dominant figure in the National Revolutionary Committee and the republic’s first finance minister. Engliš later connects this experience of persecution under Austrian rule to Rašín’s harsh political methods, making biography part of his explanation of governing style.
The entry’s substantive center is the creation of financial institutions after imperial dissolution:
As the first minister of finance of the new republic Rašín had to organize a financial and currency system, since as a territorial fraction of Austria-Hungary it had no central departments of its own.
Financial independence therefore required administrative construction as well as monetary separation. Rašín turned the Ministry of Finance’s banking office into the new state’s central bank and stamped circulating Austrian notes. Half the notes presented were withdrawn through a compulsory government loan paying one percent; a capital levy in 1920 provided for the substitution of state obligations. Engliš describes these measures as reducing circulation and revaluing the currency. The first budget, domestic liberty loan, and external credit for food and raw materials complete the account of his organizing achievement.
Engliš then locates these policies within a definite economic outlook:
Strongly individualistic, Rašín believed in personal responsibility and, as an adherent of a productive system dominated by the entrepreneur, opposed all reliance upon the state.
Separating government enterprises from state administration and insisting on economy expressed this commitment. The juxtaposition is significant: building the state’s financial machinery accompanied a rejection of dependence upon it. Engliš praises Rašín’s determination, candor, and audacity while judging his views sometimes too narrow.
The conclusion shifts from policy to political memory:
His death by violence made him a national martyr and saint and elevated the idea of well balanced finances to the status of unwritten law.
Rašín’s assassination by a Communist in 1923 thus explains more than the end of his career: it helps explain the authority acquired by his fiscal principles. The entry’s enduring interest lies in this connection between institution-building, personal conviction, and commemorative power, while retaining a critical distance from the statesman’s sanctification.
This work was divided into 2 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 2 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian