Karl Theodor von Inama-Sternegg · 1892
Inama-Sternegg’s statistical pamphlet examines 10,000 assistance cases recorded by Vienna’s Verein gegen Verarmung und Bettelei, which he presided over. Its central claim is methodological and practical: individualized investigation supplies the evidence needed to understand impoverishment and improve relief. Across five sections, the report moves from the justification and construction of its statistics to settlement rights, household circumstances and health, then employment, income, housing costs and debt. Poverty emerges through intersecting vulnerabilities rather than a single defining condition.
Die Wirksamkeit des Vereines ist vor Allem auf die Hebung sinkender Existenzen gerichtet; die Unterstützung bei chronischem Nothstande ist daher nur ausnahmsweise und dann nur einmalig bewilligt, wenn eben die Noth des Augenblickes dadurch abgewendet werden kann.
English translation: The association’s activity is directed above all toward restoring declining livelihoods; assistance in cases of chronic distress is therefore approved only exceptionally, and then only once, when immediate hardship can thereby be averted.
This preventive mandate defines the evidence’s scope. From more than 50,000 personal files, the study excludes rejected applicants and insufficiently documented cases. Its subjects are principally people whose livelihoods might still be secured, with preference given to married or widowed applicants and families with children. Inama-Sternegg claims representativeness for the association’s clientele while distinguishing it from recipients of public relief. The resulting statistics cannot simply describe all Vienna’s poor. His account of punched cards and three passes through an electrical counting machine also makes the production of cross-tabulated social knowledge part of the report’s argument.
The third section separates birthplace, legal municipal affiliation and duration of residence. These distinctions expose the gap between social belonging and entitlement to assistance. Among recipients without Viennese affiliation, 95.5% had lived in Vienna for more than two years; roughly three-quarters had stayed over ten years. Their exclusion therefore indicts settlement legislation rather than merely documenting migration.
Eine Anhäufung ungeordneter, declassirter wirtschaftlicher Existenzen in einer Gemeinde ist zweifellos eine Gefahr für die sociale Ordnung; aber die Thatsache einer solchen Anhäufung ist auch immer ein Symptom einer unvollkommenen sozialen Ordnung, für welche die Gemeinde selbst zum Mindesten mit verantwortlich gemacht werden muss.
English translation: An accumulation of disordered, economically declassed livelihoods in a municipality is undoubtedly a danger to the social order; but the fact of such an accumulation is also always a symptom of an imperfect social order, for which the municipality itself must at least share responsibility.
The reciprocal formulation matters: poor residents are represented both as a perceived threat and as evidence of institutional failure. Private assistance bridges a public responsibility that legal affiliation inadequately recognizes. Comparisons with Leipzig and Frankfurt sharpen this criticism, although Inama-Sternegg acknowledges that German relief residence and Austrian settlement rights are not equivalent institutions.
Section IV shifts attention from applicants to households. Children’s ages, continued residence at home and dependence help explain why need persists even as parents grow older. Widows face particularly severe combinations of childcare, restricted employment and illness. Against an image of familial disintegration, the report stresses how rarely all children have left the household.
Wie gering erscheint nach solchen Ziffern die Leistung der Kinderversorgungs-Anstalten, wie gross dagegen das Mass der Opfer und der Entbehrungen, unter welchen selbst die Aermsten sich ihren Familienzusammenhalt noch bewahren!
English translation: How small the contribution of institutions providing for children appears in light of such figures, and how great, by contrast, the measure of sacrifice and deprivation through which even the poorest still preserve their family cohesion!
Family solidarity thus becomes an achievement sustained through deprivation, not proof of adequate resources. Illness, present or past, is identified as a cause of impoverishment in more than 44% of cases, connecting household dependency to interrupted earning capacity.
The final section distinguishes occupational standing from actual income. Casual work blurs self-employment and dependence, while reported occupations may preserve identities after livelihoods have disappeared. Women’s inferior earnings and access to regular employment recur throughout the analysis. Supplementary earnings can improve household resources, but do not reliably lift day labourers or casually employed women beyond the lowest income band. Subletting similarly mitigates rent burdens without demonstrating housing security.
Debt supplies the concluding conceptual distinction. Borrowing among independent tradespeople can indicate remaining creditworthiness and a prospect of recovery; debts for daily necessities among other workers and most women instead register acute distress and often uncollectible claims. These distinctions support differentiated relief rather than uniform judgments about indebtedness. The pamphlet’s significance lies in making charitable casework an instrument of institutional criticism: its statistics defend the association’s preventive mission while demanding improvement in its own practice and in the public arrangements surrounding poverty.
This work was divided into 7 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 7 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian