Karl Theodor von Inama-Sternegg · 1889
Inama-Sternegg’s statistical article examines the divergence between assessed tax values and property sale prices in Tirol and Vorarlberg. It supplements an earlier Austrian survey that lacked these provinces, using fiscal records of 951 purchases and compulsory auctions submitted for fee assessment in January and February 1887. Its argument proceeds from aggregate ratios through tables classified by tax category, sale-value bracket, and financial district, before considering landholding arrangements and auction results. The central finding is that market prices exceed fiscal valuations unusually sharply; explaining that divergence requires attention to both demand and the construction of the tax base.
The reported aggregate ratio is 3.55 gulden in purchase price for every gulden of assessed value, against 2.25 in the other Austrian provinces combined. Yet this average conceals important differences. Properties subject only to land tax dominate numerically, while a small number of properties subject to rental-value taxation account for a disproportionate share of assessed value and proceeds. Inama-Sternegg therefore distinguishes the frequency of transactions from their weight in the aggregate.
Im Ganzen trifft auch hier das für die übrigen Länder gewonnene Ergebniss zu, dass sich Steuerwerth und Verkehrswerth bei den der Hauszinssteuer unterliegenden Realitäten am nächsten kommen.
English translation: Overall, the finding obtained for the other provinces also holds here: assessed tax value and market value come closest to one another for properties subject to the rental-value tax.
The tax categories are explanatory variables, not merely administrative headings. Inama-Sternegg suggests that relatively heavy building taxation has depressed building values or restrained their appreciation relative to land. He nevertheless declines a closer analysis because the cases are few and the adjustments associated with newer building taxes remain unsettled. His tables thus support qualified interpretation rather than an unrestricted causal claim.
Across sale-value brackets, the largest discrepancies occur among middle-valued properties, especially those selling for 2,000–5,000 gulden. The same broad pattern appears elsewhere in Austria, but Tirol and Vorarlberg show a wider gap in every bracket. Geographical contrasts also depend partly on composition: rental-taxed properties lower Innsbruck’s aggregate ratio, whereas exceptional mixed-tax sales raise Brixen’s. Trient’s numerous small transactions bring its overall market-to-tax ratio closer to parity. District averages consequently cannot be read as straightforward measures of local demand.
The concluding interpretation asks why prices for land-taxed properties diverge so strongly from cadastral net returns. Inama-Sternegg sees no reason to assume exceptionally low assessment during land-tax regulation and turns instead to purchasing conditions and ownership structure.
Es muss unentschieden bleiben, inwieweit diese Differenz auf den intensiveren Begehr nach Grundstücken, inwieweit etwa auf die Verschiedenheit der Bodenzerstückelung in den einzelnen Landestheilen zurückzuführen ist.
English translation: It must remain undecided how far this difference is attributable to more intense demand for land and how far, perhaps, to differences in land fragmentation in the individual parts of the provinces.
This reservation frames two connected hypotheses. Greater wealth and the system of consolidated holdings in northern Tirol may make additional parcels especially valuable as improvements to existing estates. Poverty and fragmentation elsewhere may constrain both purchasing power and opportunities to increase yields. Alongside this demand-side account, Inama-Sternegg identifies a structural effect of the parcel cadastre: assessed net returns may approximate actual returns more closely where the parcel itself constitutes the holding. Even uniform assessment principles can therefore produce unequal effective tax bases and influence property values.
The closing table examines 102 compulsory auctions, whose aggregate sale-price-to-tax-value ratio of 4.36 exceeds that of all observed transactions. Unlike the more usual Austrian pattern, forced sales here do not bring prices closer to assessed values.
Diese günstigen Verkaufserlöse bei executiven Feilbietungen lassen daher wohl eine starke Concurrenz der Nachfrage nach Realitäten vermuten.
English translation: These favourable sale proceeds at compulsory auctions therefore suggest strong competition among those seeking to acquire property.
Inama-Sternegg treats these results as further evidence of vigorous demand, while retaining regional qualifications and excluding Vorarlberg from firm comparison because its auction sample is too small. The article’s significance lies in connecting fiscal statistics to the economics of landholding: assessed value is neither a transparent measure of market worth nor a neutral benchmark independent of taxation, parcel structure, and the productive uses available to purchasers.
This work was divided into 5 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 5 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian