Karlheinz Muhr Library

The Complete “Austrian School of Economics” Collection


© 2026 Karlheinz Muhr Library·Conceptualized, designed & built bykrin.ai↗
Karlheinz Muhr Library
ArchiveTimelineLibrarian
Sign in
Archive/Emil Lederer
[Diskussionsbeitrag zum Verwaltungsstreitverfahren], S. 177

Emil Lederer · 1921

[Diskussionsbeitrag zum Verwaltungsstreitverfahren], S. 177

1 sections
Ask about this book

About this work

Emil Lederer: Intervention on Administrative Litigation (1921)

This recorded commission intervention proposes wording for § 16(2), formerly § 14, governing challenges to the statutory conditions for municipalization. Lederer moves from a draft provision to a brief explanation of its procedural aims: limiting delay while enabling challenges in the public interest.

The proposal assigns disputes to administrative courts designated by the central authority of the Land. Lederer explains the restriction on appeals:

Zunächst war die Meinung, daß das Verwaltungsstreitverfahren in seiner zeitraubenden Durchführung möglichst abgekürzt werden soll durch Begrenzung auf 2 Instanzen.

English translation: Initially, the view was that administrative litigation, with its time-consuming proceedings, should be shortened as much as possible by limiting it to two judicial instances.

He expects the authority generally to designate the two highest instances. Proceedings must begin within one month of public notification. Standing extends to every member of the municipal representative body, the entrepreneur whose enterprise faces municipalization, and the statutory representatives of its workers and salaried employees.

The distinctive conceptual move is to give municipal representatives a public-interest role:

Zweitens soll die Popularklage gegeben sein in der Form, daß die Mitglieder der Gemeindevertretung gleichsam als Anwälte des öffentlichen Wohls diese Kriterien durch Klage anzufechten in der Lage sind.

English translation: Second, provision should be made for a public-interest action in a form that enables members of the municipal representative body, as advocates, as it were, of the public welfare, to challenge these criteria through litigation.

This standing is broader than protection of the affected proprietor alone, but remains attached to specified institutional roles. Bringing proceedings suspends the challenged measure, except where the action contests a prohibition on establishing new enterprises. The intervention thus concerns the procedural control of municipalization, balancing expedited review with representation of public and workplace interests.

Sections

This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.

  1. 1Lederer's Proposed Administrative Judicial Procedure for Municipalization Disputes▾

Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.

Ask the Librarian