Karlheinz Muhr Library

The Complete “Austrian School of Economics” Collection


© 2026 Karlheinz Muhr Library·Conceptualized, designed & built bykrin.ai↗
Karlheinz Muhr Library
ArchiveTimelineLibrarian
Sign in
Archive/Emil Lederer
[Diskussionsbeitrag zum gemeindlichen Konkurrenzbetrieb, S. 159]

Emil Lederer · 1921

[Diskussionsbeitrag zum gemeindlichen Konkurrenzbetrieb, S. 159]

1 sections
Ask about this book

About this work

Emil Lederer: Municipal Competitive Enterprise (1921)

This brief discussion contribution from commission proceedings concerns whether municipal enterprise creates a danger of hostile action against private businesses. Lederer’s central move is to distinguish powers municipalities already possess from those conferred by a municipalization law. Even without such legislation, a municipality can establish its own competing enterprise. If animosity prevailed in a town council—something he considers unlikely—it could already find an outlet through that competition.

Ich erblicke darin keine Gefahr.

English translation: I see no danger in this.

The reassurance rests on both existing municipal powers and Lederer’s judgment about political plausibility. He then shifts from possible municipal hostility to the conditions under which municipalization remains practicable:

Die Kommunalisierung wäre überhaupt unmöglich, wenn man die Gemeinden zwingen würde, in jedem Wirtschaftszweige partout alles zu übernehmen und alles zu entschädigen. Damit wäre der Gedanke der Sozialisierung nicht mehr durchführbar.

English translation: Municipalization would be altogether impossible if municipalities were compelled to take over absolutely everything in every branch of the economy and to pay compensation for everything. That would make the idea of socialization no longer practicable.

The target is compulsory comprehensive takeover and compensation, not compensation as such. Lederer thus defends room for selective municipal action: requiring universal acquisition would defeat socialization rather than safeguard its implementation. The contribution offers a compact argument about institutional feasibility, without specifying acquisition procedures or compensation rules.

Sections

This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.

  1. 1Municipal Competition and the Feasibility of Socialization▾

Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.

Ask the Librarian