Karlheinz Muhr Library

The Complete “Austrian School of Economics” Collection


© 2026 Karlheinz Muhr Library·Conceptualized, designed & built bykrin.ai↗
Karlheinz Muhr Library
ArchiveTimelineLibrarian
Sign in
Archive/Emil Lederer
[Diskussionsbeitrag zum Kohlenbergbau, Bd. II, S. 702, Nr. 92]

Emil Lederer · 1920

[Diskussionsbeitrag zum Kohlenbergbau, Bd. II, S. 702, Nr. 92]

1 sections
Ask about this book

About this work

Emil Lederer’s 1920 commission speaking turn addresses the organizational boundary between coal mining and iron and steel production. He interprets the proposal under discussion as requiring the inclusion of iron and steel works, followed by the separation of their coking operations:

Die Hüttenwerke würden nach der Absicht, die vorliegt, einzubeziehen sein; die Hüttenwerke wären zu trennen, die Verkokung im Hüttenwerk wäre herauszulösen.

English translation: The iron and steel works would have to be included under the proposal under consideration; the iron and steel works would have to be separated, and coking within the works would have to be detached.

When Wissell asks whether this means removal from the works themselves, Lederer confirms: coking would be transferred to the coal community. The brief exchange thus clarifies a concrete institutional consequence of the proposal: an integrated industrial activity would be reassigned to the organization responsible for coal.

Sections

This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.

  1. 1Separating Coking Operations from Ironworks for the Coal Association▾

Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.

Ask the Librarian