This recorded commission speaking turn concerns the ordering of numbered provisions in the coal-mining discussion. Lederer proposes a three-part renumbering:
Lederer: § 6 wäre 5, § 7 wäre 6 und § 5 wäre 7.
English translation: Lederer: § 6 would become 5, § 7 would become 6, and § 5 would become 7.
The intervention would place the existing §§ 6 and 7 before § 5. Its scope is procedural: the record supplies neither the provisions’ contents nor a reason for changing their sequence. It therefore documents a precise proposal about textual organization, but does not support attributing a broader substantive position on coal mining to Lederer.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian