This recorded commission speaking turn concerns the timing of a proposed measure. Lederer argues that leaving its implementation unspecified would deprive the draft of its effect:
Ich glaube, daß sich der Entwurf der anderen Herren nach meinem Urteil dann um die ganze Wirkung bringen würde, wenn überhaupt eine Frist nicht genannt wird, weil es unbedingt so gelassen wird, daß es ganz ins Unbestimmte gerückt ist, und diese Gruppe der Kommission überhaupt keine Vorstellung davon hat, wann es geschieht.
English translation: I believe that, in my judgment, the other gentlemen’s draft would then deprive itself of its entire effect if no deadline whatsoever were specified, because it is simply left entirely indefinite, and this group of the commission has no idea at all when it will happen.
The intervention links practical effectiveness to a definite timetable and the commission’s ability to anticipate action. It supplies neither details of the draft nor a preferred deadline; its central demand is temporal specificity.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian