This recorded commission speaking turn addresses the distribution of authority within a proposed coal-industry administration. Replying to arguments advanced by Lindemann and supported by Vogelstein, Lederer focuses on the draft’s institutional arrangements rather than reopening the general debate. His defence rests on two distinctions: elected representation need not reproduce the power of the largest industrial leaders, and budgetary oversight need not entail interference in management.
Lederer discounts the fear that twenty-five general directors could impose their will on the coal directorate, producing damaging institutional friction. The representatives would instead be elected by leaders of mining districts and enterprises. Presuming proportional representation, he expects smaller managers also to gain seats: the body would not simply consist of men claiming to be Germany’s coal king. This is an expectation about electoral composition, not a demonstrated guarantee.
He then interprets § 11 as separating approval of the budget from operational authority:
Im Zusammenhang mit § 11 ist zu betrachten, daß dort der Haushalts- anschlag zu genehmigen ist, daß aber das Kohlendirektorium in der Geschäfts- führung vollständig frei ist.
English translation: In connection with § 11, it must be considered that the budget estimate must be approved there, but that the coal directorate is completely free in its management.
For Lederer, the Reich Coal Council’s supervisory role must not allow it repeatedly to counteract the directorate. The practical consequence is a clear hierarchy within management:
In der Geschäftsführung müssen demgemäß die Generaldirektoren Order parieren.
English translation: Accordingly, in matters of management the general directors must obey orders.
The contribution’s significance lies in this compact institutional argument: representation and financial scrutiny can coexist with an executive authority capable of directing powerful industrial managers.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian