Karlheinz Muhr Library

The Complete “Austrian School of Economics” Collection


© 2026 Karlheinz Muhr Library·Conceptualized, designed & built bykrin.ai↗
Karlheinz Muhr Library
ArchiveTimelineLibrarian
Sign in
Archive/Emil Lederer
[Diskussionsbeitrag zum Kohlenbergbau, Bd. II, S. 808, Nr. 168]

Emil Lederer · 1920

[Diskussionsbeitrag zum Kohlenbergbau, Bd. II, S. 808, Nr. 168]

1 sections
Ask about this book

About this work

Emil Lederer’s 1920 commission speaking turn on coal mining addresses voting procedure. His brief intervention presents voting by Kurien—separate constituent groups—as necessary to prevent the outcome from depending on chance:

Das ist noch die Frage, ob nicht nach Kurien abgestimmt wird, was man wird machen müssen, weil man es nicht dem Zufall anheim geben kann.

English translation: The question still remains whether voting should be by curiae, which will have to be done because it cannot be left to chance.

The remark moves from an unresolved procedural question to an assertion of necessity. Its significance lies in linking decision-making to institutional safeguards; it does not specify the groups or voting rules.

Sections

This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.

  1. 1Voting by Curiae Rather Than Leaving Outcomes to Chance▾

Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.

Ask the Librarian