Eugen Peter Schwiedland’s expanded edition of his 1916 university lecture offers a historical interpretation of economic power and social transformation under the pressure of world war. Its two principal movements connect competition between states with changes within societies. The first traces the succession of European commercial and imperial leadership and anticipates larger, increasingly self-sufficient political formations; the second follows the dissolution of medieval economic restraints into liberal competition, industrial expansion, and social insecurity. Both turn on a distinction between accumulated wealth and the human capacities that produce and sustain it.
Die Geltung der Menschen ist aber nicht die Frucht ihres Wohlstandes; dieser selbst ist vielmehr, beim reichgewordenen Manne wie bei der emporgekommenen Nation, eine Folge ihrer Leistungsfähigkeit und günstiger Umstände.
English translation: People’s standing, however, is not the fruit of their prosperity; rather, prosperity itself, in the case of both the man who has become rich and the nation that has risen, is a consequence of their productive capacity and favorable circumstances.
Wealth increases the possibilities of action without guaranteeing either happiness or continued strength. Its significance is comparative, and its possession requires constant renewal. Excessive comfort or harmful distribution can undermine the capacities on which prosperity depends. Schwiedland thus presents economic history as an interaction between geographical opportunity, political organization, productive effort, and national character. His explanations repeatedly employ racial and national stereotypes, assigning peoples enduring dispositions that supposedly explain their achievements and failures.
The historical sequence runs from Italian trade through Spanish conquest, Dutch commerce and colonial cultivation, French state-directed manufacturing, and British maritime-industrial predominance to German and American competition. Each ascendant power combines productive advantages with institutions capable of exploiting them. Italy benefits from eastern commerce but loses its centrality when oceanic routes shift trade toward the Atlantic. Spain illustrates the danger of possessing treasure without sustaining productive activity. Holland integrates colonial production with metropolitan commerce, while Britain combines settlement, naval protection, manufacturing, finance, and commercial intermediation. Germany’s scientific and organizational strengths and America’s resources, protected market, and industrial concentration challenge that combination.
This account also supplies a partisan explanation of the war. Schwiedland depicts Britain as systematically organizing continental coalitions against its strongest competitor, now Germany. His admiration for British economic achievement coexists with denunciations of its coercion and imperial opportunism. The war nevertheless reveals a structural problem extending beyond British policy: industrial societies depend on overseas food, raw materials, and markets whose accessibility rests on political and naval power.
Eroberung war der Grundsatz der ältesten Kolonialpolitik, Befruchtung durch Unternehmer jener der zweiten Epoche, Entfaltung durch Besiedlung der dritten, und nun gilt es, die Kolonien zu sichern.
English translation: Conquest was the principle of the earliest colonial policy, productive development through entrepreneurs that of the second epoch, development through settlement that of the third, and now the task is to secure the colonies.
This progression makes territorial consolidation the next imperial imperative. Former agricultural suppliers are developing industries of their own, threatening the complementary exchange between European manufactures and overseas primary products. Schwiedland consequently envisages extensive, preferably contiguous empires stretching from temperate regions into the tropics, or organized federations capable of greater self-sufficiency. American and Japanese power marks the end of Europe’s exclusive predominance. His prospect of European cooperation remains explicitly directed toward preserving European leadership; his criticism of particular colonial practices does not displace the assumption that imperial possession is a legitimate foundation of security.
The second movement relocates the problem of power within society. Medieval lordship and guild organization impose severe constraints but also establish reciprocal obligations and protections. Mercantilist states enlarge this regulatory framework into national economic organization. From the late eighteenth century, legal equality, occupational freedom, mobility, and contractual liberty dismantle inherited restrictions. Yet formal freedom exposes unequal economic capacities rather than neutralizing them.
Diese Ordnung wird vom Ende des 18. Jhts. ab aufgelöst und an ihre Stelle tritt Individualismus, ja Voluntarismus: freies Walten der starken Persönlichkeiten — ein Wandel, der die Umgestaltung der Welt bedingt.
English translation: From the end of the eighteenth century onward, this order is dissolved, and individualism, indeed voluntarism, takes its place: the unrestricted activity of strong personalities—a change that brings about the transformation of the world.
Schwiedland credits this emancipation with extraordinary technical innovation, cheaper production, expanding consumption, population growth, education, and public health. Statistical comparisons of industrial output establish the scale of the achievement. But competition also produces concentration, monopoly agreements, insecure employment, commercial manipulation, and the erosion of independent middle-class livelihoods. Austrian income-tax figures and comparisons with Prussian incomes expose the distance between aggregate enrichment and broadly shared security. Workers suffer especially when excessive production precipitates falling prices, wage reductions, and unemployment.
The argument culminates in a cultural diagnosis rather than a detailed reform programme. Acquisitiveness and manufactured wants threaten judgment, health, and inward independence; increased command over nature can coexist with diminished command over oneself. Neither technical progress nor sober self-interest supplies a sufficient collective purpose.
Über den toten Punkt der Gegenwart, über die Gefahr des kulturlichen Nihilismus, bringen uns vielmehr nur Ziele hinweg, die der Gesamtheit frommen, den einzelnen innerlich heben und in ihm reinere Affekte wecken.
English translation: Rather, only goals that benefit the community as a whole, inwardly elevate the individual, and awaken purer feelings within him can carry us beyond the present impasse and the danger of cultural nihilism.
The pamphlet’s significance lies in joining imperial political economy to a critique of liberal society’s unequal and spiritually impoverishing consequences. International strength and domestic flourishing both require productive capacities, but wealth alone cannot secure either. Schwiedland closes by calling for renewed social organization, communal attachment, and inward stability, leaving their institutional realization substantially open.
This work was divided into 9 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 9 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian