Richard Schüller’s article, drawn from a lecture delivered at the Industriellen Klub on 14 April 1921, examines Austria’s search for foreign credit after the exhaustion of postwar governmental assistance. Speaking as a senior official who participated in negotiations, Schüller moves from diplomatic developments in Paris and London to the proposed involvement of the League of Nations, then considers the economic conditions under which borrowing might succeed. His central argument is that Austria is entering a new financial regime: relief credits deferred into the future must give way to secured borrowing, whose costs cannot be reconciled with the continued distribution of heavily subsidized food.
Austria had received approximately £30 million in foreign governmental credits during 1919–1920, principally for food, freight, and other essential supplies. The Reparation Commission proposed another £50 million over five years, but the governments represented on that commission unanimously rejected the proposal at the January Paris conference. Schüller explains this apparent contradiction through the rapid deterioration of the prospective lenders’ own finances. Austria’s difficulty is therefore not simply a shortage of diplomatic goodwill: its need for reconstruction coincides with an international contraction that restricts the resources available to meet it.
The Loucheur project attempted to substitute private finance for governmental lending through a joint-stock company. Schüller carefully distinguishes its proposed working capital from the credit Austria itself would receive. French and Italian banks avoided an outright refusal, while British banks remained reluctant; their common objection was that Austria’s credit requirements were political and could not be met without governmental intervention. Private institutions might undertake particular profitable transactions, but they would not assume responsibility for financing the state. London negotiations confirmed that direct government loans were unavailable, while the British Treasury also regarded a guarantee as effectively equivalent to lending.
The first prerequisite for new borrowing was consequently to alter the priority of existing claims. Austria sought cancellation; the settlement instead envisaged their postponement and the release of pledged public assets and revenues as security for new creditors. Schüller makes the distinction explicit:
Das zweite ist, daß die Pfänder für die aufzunehmenden Kredite freigegeben werden.
English translation: The second point is that the collateral is released for the loans to be raised.
This did not extinguish the old debts. New loans would rank ahead of occupation costs, food credits, reparations, and the state’s contingent obligations toward foreign private creditors. A postponement of roughly twenty years had been discussed, but its duration remained unsettled, and American and successor-state consent was still required. Schüller expects agreement, partly because postponement could also benefit successor states obliged to issue bonds for former Austrian state property. His account thus treats the reconstruction of credit as a rearrangement of legal priorities, not the disappearance of indebtedness.
The second institutional question concerned who should organize borrowing and supervise its securities. Private bankers offered neither assured access to funds on ordinary terms nor an acceptable basis for public control. Direct Allied administration, meanwhile, raised the danger of political interference. The League of Nations’ Financial Committee emerged as the intermediary:
Der Völkerbund soll nun dieses System zuerst für Österreich anwenden und die Probe bei Österreich machen.
English translation: The League of Nations is now to apply this system first to Austria and put it to the test in Austria.
Austria would become the first application of a broader scheme linking international credit to the administration of assets or revenues. Schüller distinguishes this arrangement from the earlier ter Meulen proposal, whose mechanism for securing merchandise transactions did not fit the Austrian state’s own need to borrow for food imports. League sponsorship matters both because it preserves a moral obligation on the governments that devised the plan and because it promises protection against excessively burdensome conditions. It does not, however, constitute a financial guarantee.
Schüller then widens the analysis to the world depression. Uneven reductions in production and consumption have disrupted exchange between industries and countries; wage reductions can further diminish demand. Austria’s already depressed productive activity should not be mistaken for immunity from a crisis elsewhere. Against this background, foreign experts make the cessation of monetary financing a condition of lending:
Die ausländischen Fachleute sagen, wenn Österreich seine Banknotenpresse einstellt, bestehe kein Zweifel, daß die relativ bescheidenen Summen, welche es benötigt, aufgebracht werden.
English translation: The foreign experts say that if Austria stops its banknote printing press, there is no doubt that the relatively modest sums it needs can be raised.
Schüller nevertheless rejects the assumption that a domestic loan could by itself stop the printing press. He considers a minimum gold-exchange value for coupon payments potentially discussable, distinguishing it from repayment of principal in gold. He also surveys preferential concessions, indirect governmental assistance through central-bank lending against the bonds, and commodity credits secured on revenues such as customs receipts. None is presented as assured; especially favorable monopolies might attract particular loans without supplying enough credit overall.
The conclusion gives these technical negotiations their immediate domestic meaning. Earlier emergency arrangements had allowed borrowed food to reach consumers almost free of charge. Repeating that practice with loans secured on future customs receipts would consume years of public revenue in a single year. Schüller’s practical conclusion is uncompromising:
Die entscheidende praktische Wirkung, mit der wir rasch zu tun haben werden, ist, daß wir in kurzer Zeit zu vollen Nahrungsmittelpreisen im Inlande werden kommen müssen.
English translation: The decisive practical consequence that we shall soon have to confront is that we shall shortly have to move to full food prices within the country.
The article’s significance lies in connecting international financial reconstruction to domestic food pricing. League mediation and reordered securities might reopen access to credit, but borrowing could not sustainably preserve emergency subsidies. Schüller presents stabilization as a change in how Austria pays for subsistence, while leaving the actual availability of foreign funds explicitly uncertain.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian