Felix Kaufmann’s Song of the Mises Circle (Das Mises-Kreis-Lied), presented in Arlene Oost-Zinner’s 2010 English translation and arrangement with music by Ralph Benatzky, is a convivial song about intellectual fellowship. Its four stanzas move from the Friday private seminar through analytical debate and communal dining to a reflection on the obligation to question. A concluding reprise repeats the fourth stanza and refrain, giving the reflective ending renewed emphasis.
The opening frames attendance as a willing sacrifice of immediate pleasures: even a beautiful May day cannot compete with the seminar’s promise of lasting truth. Scholarly dedication is celebrated through affectionate exaggeration:
In the Mises Kreis, it’s always center stage Buckets full of truth, remain the latest rage.
Truth appears both as an enduring ideal and as the circle’s shared enthusiasm. The recurring refrain makes the seminar a home, joining “Society, Economy and Truth” to the pleasures of belonging. Its invocation of Verstehen associates that belonging with a demand for understanding and clarity, without developing a methodological doctrine.
The second stanza turns inquiry into comic action. A troublesome problem becomes a visitor whose protective layers will not survive the seminar:
Do you know a problem full of nasty quirks? Come escort it to Mises’ door.
Problems are whittled to their core; hard nuts melt like chocolate creams on tongues practiced in deduction. This shift from intellectual difficulty to confectionery links rigorous discussion with sociability. The third stanza extends that connection beyond the seminar room: intellectual satisfaction gives way to bodily appetite, dinner at the Green Anchor, and a midnight visit to the Künstlercafé. Economic language follows the participants to the table, where “Import tariffs” become a joke about replenishing hungry bodies.
The final stanza unsettles the earlier confidence by asking whether inquiry is itself worthwhile. Against the image of life flowing onward while individuals play only a small part, it entertains the temptation to stop worrying:
Should we not, perhaps, keep these thoughts at bay, Push our cares aside, and relish what’s today?
The answer is a compact declaration that passive accommodation will not suffice: the participants must take a stand. Returning to the familiar refrain then makes seminar attendance more than a pleasant habit; it becomes an affirmation of engaged thought. The song’s central claim is enacted through this return: intellectual responsibility and convivial pleasure sustain one another. Its relevance lies in this affectionate self-portrait of a scholarly circle, where deduction, food, humor, and commitment form a continuous social life.
This work was divided into 2 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 2 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian