Victor Mataja’s contribution to the International Statistical Institute’s Copenhagen session proposes a statistical study of the periodical press extending beyond counts of titles. He asks how to measure the activity and reach of publications whose political, cultural, and economic importance exceeds the available quantitative knowledge. His argument proceeds from the press’s social functions to classification, circulation measures, and the institutional conditions of reliable reporting.
Mataja treats periodical publishing as both an infrastructure of public communication and a commercial industry. Newspapers and journals disseminate knowledge while connecting producers with consumers.
Durch das hochentwickelte Anzeigenwesen ist die periodische Presse zum Marktplatz der Welt geworden; diese Verbindung wurde zwar schon öfter beklagt, wir müssen damit aber wie mit einer feststehenden Tatsache rechnen.
English translation: Through the highly developed business of advertising the periodical press has become the marketplace of the world; this connection has indeed often been lamented, but we must reckon with it as with an established fact.
Advertising is thus integral to the inquiry: it explains both the press’s economic power and publishers’ incentives concerning statistical disclosure. Concentration, common ownership, and inequalities of scale also make publishing enterprises important objects of investigation. Occupational, industrial, and postal records nevertheless provide only partial evidence; the disappearance of newspaper and advertising taxes has eliminated some earlier information sources.
Nur ein Teil, der sehr viel sagen und sehr viel zur Aufklärung beitragen könnte, spricht vergleichsweise wenig und verstummt bisweilen gänzlich, wo er gerade am ausführlichsten reden sollte, und dieser Teil ist die Statistik.
English translation: Only one party, which could say a great deal and contribute a great deal to enlightenment, speaks comparatively little and at times falls wholly silent just where it ought to speak most fully, and this party is statistics.
This contrast between public importance and statistical silence motivates Mataja’s programme. His scope includes the entire periodical press, encompassing specialist, scientific, and entertainment publications. News transmission cannot strictly distinguish newspapers from journals: daily papers publish literature, specialist publications report news, and advertisements themselves convey information. Commercial house organs and publications shaped by postal privileges further complicate classification. Observable publishing practices therefore matter more than rigid conceptual boundaries.
Mataja distinguishes publications, publishing enterprises, and personnel as three fields of inquiry. These encompass publications’ characteristics and finances, ownership and productive resources, and editorial, administrative, and technical employment. Yet he limits what a recurring general survey should attempt. Detailed business questions may require special investigations, while much enterprise and employment information belongs within existing industrial and labour statistics. Firms combining printing and publishing create particular difficulties of separation.
The distinctive task of press statistics is to establish publications’ activity and reach. Counting a large daily and a small publication as equivalent units obscures consequential differences. Mataja distinguishes Druckauflage, completed copies printed; Ausgabeziffer, copies distributed after deducting undistributed stock and returns; and Absatzziffer, copies sold after also excluding free copies. These measures express different relationships between production and readership. Unsold copies register costs rather than public reading, while paid circulation offers stronger evidence of reader interest than complimentary distribution.
Precision must nevertheless be balanced against feasibility. Sales figures require complicated calculations, and net distribution may also be difficult to establish. Print runs can therefore serve as a practical measure when easier to report and verify. This compromise requires explicit definitions: figures described simply as circulation are not necessarily comparable. Reporting periods also matter because demand varies with weekdays, seasons, events, serial publications, and promotional campaigns. Mataja favours averages for the preceding year to moderate accidental fluctuations.
Commercial incentives are central to his concluding discussion. Advertising revenues can encourage publishers to conceal or exaggerate circulation, making rounded, undated directory figures doubtful evidence. Advertisers, however, also create pressure for verification. American and British organizations, audits, directories, and measures against false claims suggest how commercial interests can support transparency. Substantial publicly funded investigation in the United States further supports his preference for verifiable figures over theoretically superior but unreliable returns.
Die Statistik des Zeitungswesens ist derzeit unzulänglich, sagten wir also.
English translation: The statistics of the newspaper business are at present inadequate, we said, then.
The diagnosis yields a programme of coordinated investigation rather than a finished administrative scheme. Statistical offices, publishers’ associations, and other interested organizations provide experience on which improved inquiry could build. Mataja links the study of press influence to measurable distribution while showing that useful statistics depend on definitions, reporting incentives, and institutional capacity.
This work was divided into 8 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 8 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian