Joseph A. Schumpeter · 1910
Joseph A. Schumpeter’s 1910 review of Eugenie Fabian-Sagal’s Albert Schäffle und seine theoretisch-nationalökonomischen Lehren presents critical appraisal as necessary to understanding an influential economist’s legacy:
Das wissenschaftliche Erbe eines Jeden, der persönlich stark wirkte und sich kraftvoll in die Strömungen seiner Zeit stürzte, bedarf immer der ordnenden Hand des Kritikers.
English translation: The scientific legacy of everyone who exerted a strong personal influence and flung himself vigorously into the currents of his time always requires the ordering hand of the critic.
The central distinction is between durable intellectual achievement and personal authority. Schumpeter asks which contributions outlast their immediate circumstances and which convictions rest on rhetorical pressure rather than argument:
In welchen Punkten hat er unsere Erkenntnis vermehrt, wo wirkte nur der Mann?
English translation: On what points did he increase our knowledge, and where was it only the man who had an effect?
This question establishes the review’s methodological standard: intellectual history should distinguish advances in knowledge from the influence of a commanding personality. Schumpeter consequently welcomes Fabian-Sagal’s critical undertaking:
Eine solche Schäffle-Monographie war also durchaus am Platze und die vorliegende hat viele Vorzüge.
English translation: Such a monograph on Schäffle was therefore entirely in place, and the present one has many merits.
His approval supports a measured assessment of Schäffle, one that can recognize intellectual stature without treating every forcefully expressed position as an enduring contribution.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian