Menger’s review assesses Gottlieb Schnapper-Arndt’s 1883 social-statistical study of smallholding, domestic industry, and everyday life in five Taunus villages. Its central claim is that intensive observation of a narrowly bounded community has scientific value: minute description can make social relations intelligible and provide evidence useful to social philosophy and policy.
The review begins by asking why these particular villages deserve attention. Neither prosperous cultural centres nor notorious sites of extreme deprivation, they are ordinary communities whose inhabitants work hard under difficult conditions. Their ordinariness makes the interest of Schnapper-Arndt’s investigation especially striking. Menger follows the study from local political history through climate, agriculture, and livestock to nail-making, net-knitting, and wire manufacture. He then stresses its extraordinary attention to housing, food, health, morals, household possessions, and expenditure:
Kein Faden Zwirn, keine Nadel, nicht ein Medicament für den Kranken, nicht eine Nuss für den Weihnachtsstisch der Kleinen entgeht dem Beobachtungsfleisse unseres Autors.
English translation: Not a thread of twine, not a needle, not a medicament for the sick man, not a nut for the children's Christmas table escapes our author's diligence of observation.
Such detail connects economic conditions to lived experience. Prices and consumption reveal how households sustain themselves, while portraits of clergy, teachers, doctors, and officials show how individual character shapes communal life. Statistical appendices extend this close observation into what Menger calls a statistics of the smallest things within a small setting.
The methodological turning point is Schnapper-Arndt’s explanation, reproduced in the review, that numerous mutually supporting observations may reduce the influence of subjectivity. Exhaustive investigation of a restricted object can sometimes disclose the operation of social factors as securely as mass observation. Menger endorses the scientific worth of this approach without turning the review into a general claim that local studies should replace broader statistics:
Schilderungen von jener Art, wie sie der Verfasser uns bietet, vertreten nicht nur die unmittelbare Beobachtung, sie lassen uns vielmehr die Wirklichkeit durch die Augen eines besonders scharfen Beobachters erkennen.
English translation: Descriptions of the kind which the author offers us do not merely take the place of direct observation; rather, they let us perceive reality through the eyes of a particularly keen observer.
The crucial move is to treat the observer’s mediation as an intellectual resource: readers gain access not merely to accumulated facts but to reality discerned by an unusually acute investigator. Menger accordingly identifies both theoretical and practical beneficiaries:
Sie sind vortreffliche Hilfsmittel für den Socialphilosophen, vornehmlich aber für den Socialpolitiker.
English translation: They are excellent aids for the social philosopher, but above all for the social politician.
The review closes by praising the book’s literary execution. Its relevance lies in this conjunction of empirical precision, interpretive observation, and readable presentation: apparently modest village circumstances become valuable evidence for understanding social life and informing policy.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian