Carl Menger’s short review, signed “M.,” welcomes the Denkbuch des österreichischen Bergwesens, published by the imperial-royal Ministry of Agriculture for the Vienna World Exhibition under A. Schauenstein’s editorship. Its central judgment is that the handbook offers a comprehensive, authoritative guide to Austrian mining and metallurgy, particularly useful to visitors studying the exhibition’s mining displays. Menger’s concern is the organization and accessibility of industrial knowledge, rather than an independent explanation of the industry’s development.
The review moves from the publication’s occasion and readership to its collaborative organization, descriptive programme, and overall merits. Menger treats the distribution of work among specialists as a response to the geographical extent and technical diversity of Austrian mining. Their essays nevertheless retain a common guiding conception. That coherence rests partly on a deliberate choice of scale:
Das Denkbuch beschränkt sich auf die Darstellung der allgemeinen Verhältnisse der österreichischen Montanindustrie und vermeidet es, Darstellungen der Details einzelner Montanwerke zu bringen, auf welche es uns dort hinweist, wo besonders abweichende oder sonst erwähnenswerthe Verhältnisse vorliegen.
English translation: The commemorative volume confines itself to presenting the general conditions of the Austrian mining industry and avoids giving accounts of the details of individual mining works, to which it directs us where particularly divergent or otherwise noteworthy conditions obtain.
The distinction between general conditions and exceptional individual works is central to Menger’s account of the handbook’s usefulness. Comprehensive coverage need not mean exhaustive description of every enterprise. Instead, a common framework connects geological deposits and the history of operations with property holdings, exploration, extraction methods, machinery, transport, and processing. It also encompasses costs, prices, annual output, employment, and markets. Menger thus presents technical and economic information as parts of a single descriptive programme, without advancing a causal theory of their relations.
His endorsement remains explicitly bounded by specialist competence:
Inwieweit das obige reichhaltige Programm in dem Denkbuche mit Rücksicht auf die einzelnen Zweige der Montanindustrie verwirklicht worden ist, dies zu beurtheilen wird Sache der mit den speciellen Verhältnissen der einzelnen Theilindustrien vertrauten Sachverständigen sein; im Großen und Ganzen wird man das obige Programm in dem Denkbuche indeß wiedergespiegelt finden.
English translation: To what extent the above rich programme has been realized in the commemorative volume with regard to the individual branches of the mining industry will be a matter for those experts to judge who are familiar with the special conditions of the several sub-industries; on the whole, however, one will find the above programme reflected in the commemorative volume.
This reservation distinguishes approval of the work’s general execution from verification of every branch-specific account. Menger concludes by praising its clear presentation, timely appearance, and careful editing, anticipating readers beyond professional mining circles. The review’s significance lies in this measured assessment of how specialist industrial knowledge can be assembled into a coherent public resource: sufficiently detailed to support study, yet organized around the industry’s general conditions.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian