Carl Menger (attributed; signed M.) · 1873
This 1873 notice, signed “M.” and attributed to Carl Menger, presents a new journal as a centre for Austrian legal scholarship. It connects the development of jurisprudence and the demands of legislative reform with the need for a sustained forum linking legal theory and practice. References to established journals in Germany, France, and Italy place the initiative within a European scholarly setting.
Initiated by the University of Vienna’s law faculty and edited by Professor Grünhut, the journal envisages quarterly publication and contributions from Viennese professors, other Austrian specialists, and German scholars. These institutional arrangements support the notice’s favourable assessment. Its primary concern is the journal’s programme and intellectual resources, rather than a detailed evaluation of individual articles.
The programme’s central commitment is to practical jurisprudence informed by philosophical understanding. Attention to contemporary legal problems should not obscure the ideas that give legal materials their deeper coherence. Historical inquiry likewise belongs within the journal when it explains the development of existing institutions. The restriction of research without an immediate contemporary connection therefore expresses an editorial priority, not a wholesale rejection of historical scholarship. Present relevance organizes the journal’s scope without requiring a simple opposition between theoretical and practical knowledge.
The geographical programme follows a comparable logic. Austrian and German private and public law provide the principal focus, while expanding international legal relations make knowledge of foreign systems increasingly important. Comparative inquiry complements domestic legal scholarship. The concluding account of contributors and literature notices reinforces confidence in the journal’s scholarly support. Taken together, these features define an institutional project in which practical usefulness, philosophical reflection, historical explanation, and international comparison sustain one another.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian