Karl Theodor von Inama-Sternegg · 1883
Inama-Sternegg’s article combines a history of Austrian mortgage statistics with a methodological assessment of the inquiry into registered liabilities at the end of 1881. Its central concern is the relationship between obligations recorded in land registers and the economic burdens actually borne by property owners. Debates about landed property and peasant inheritance reform give this statistical problem its policy significance.
Das Interesse, welches neuerdings an den grossen Fragen des Grundbesitzes erwacht ist, hat auch das Problem der Feststellung des gesammten auf dem Grundbesitz lastenden Schuldenbetrages wieder in den Vordergrund der Diskussion gerückt.
English translation: The interest which has of late awakened in the great questions of landed property has also brought the problem of ascertaining the total amount of debt burdening landed property once more into the foreground of discussion.
Registration is an indispensable starting point, but not a transparent account of indebtedness. Unregistered obligations and burdens without monetary valuations escape enumeration. Conversely, repaid but uncancelled debts, partially amortized loans, and obligations secured on several properties can inflate recorded totals. Even an exhaustive investigation of the registers would not eliminate every discrepancy. Inama-Sternegg therefore defends a practicable summary enumeration, provided its findings are understood as statements about registered liabilities.
Dass die Aufgabe auch in dieser Beschränkung ihre volle Berechtigung hat, wird nicht zu verkennen sein.
English translation: That the task has its full justification even within this limitation will not be open to mistake.
This defence of limited knowledge structures the historical account. The 1858 inquiry arose chiefly from deliberations about interest and usury legislation. Inconsistent instructions and uneven territorial coverage weakened comparability, while the absence of a common reference date prevented the returns from representing a clearly defined moment.
Sodann fehlte es an einem bestimmten einheitlichen Zeitpunkt des Abschlusses für die Nachweisungen.
English translation: Furthermore, a definite uniform closing date for the returns was lacking.
Administrative arrangements thus determine what the figures can establish. The article follows statistical congresses, initiatives of the Central Commission, Carl Demuth’s pioneering returns, and ministerial resistance before annual reporting began in 1868. Fifteen years of experience, Inama-Sternegg argues, answered objections concerning excessive expense and workload. Nevertheless, improved instructions remained necessary: mortgages secured simultaneously on several properties should be counted only once, and returns should identify the economic character of the property. Classification by legal transaction alone could not adequately explain the economic causes of borrowing.
Territorial differences introduce another difficulty. Where land registers were still being established, increased recorded activity might indicate broader administrative coverage rather than greater borrowing. Distinguishing territories with established registers from those with incomplete systems is therefore essential to interpreting apparent changes in indebtedness.
The final section assesses the 1882 inquiry, which measured registered mortgage liabilities at 31 December 1881 and distinguished debts by recorded interest rate. The total reached approximately 3.062 billion gulden, excluding railway and state-property debts. Vorarlberg was omitted, and several provinces supplied incomplete returns; supplementary estimates for Tyrol drew on its earlier mortgage revision and annual statistics. Duplicate securities, maximum credit guarantees, obsolete entries, and unrecorded changes in interest continued to separate official totals from effective burdens.
Despite these limitations, Inama-Sternegg draws cautious economic conclusions. The persistence of older debts supports consideration of land-debt relief and wider use of amortization. Yet register categories do not consistently distinguish large estates, urban buildings, agricultural land, and industrial property. Without reliable property valuations, debt-to-value ratios cannot be established, and comparisons based on area or population remain provisional.
Supplementary institutional figures suggest that financial institutions and public funds held about 845 million gulden in mortgages, or 27.6 percent of recorded debt. An extrapolation from the proportion of new burdens arising from loans suggests that these creditors held roughly half of loan-derived mortgage debt. International comparisons offer a plausibility check without resolving the evidence’s limitations.
The conclusion assigns complementary functions to comprehensive surveys and annual reporting. General enumeration establishes the stock of registered obligations; continuous records should clarify changes, creditor and debtor characteristics, repayment conditions, property uses, and borrowing causes. A renewed general survey should follow completion of the new land registers. The article ultimately defends statistical inquiry by delimiting its claims: imperfect administrative evidence remains useful when its institutional origins and explanatory boundaries are made explicit.
This work was divided into 4 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 4 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian