Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk · 1883
Böhm-Bawerk’s review assesses Cauwès’s textbook as a substantial contribution to French economic teaching whose scholarly thoroughness exceeds its theoretical originality. Moving from the book’s pedagogical design and political orientation to its organization and conceptual weaknesses, the review ends by interpreting its commercial success as evidence of a shift in French economic opinion.
Despite its title, the Précis offers an extensive system of political economy. Specially marked paragraphs supply a shorter course within the fuller exposition, allowing readers to bypass detailed discussions. Böhm-Bawerk locates its intellectual position between familiar labels: moderate protectionism describes it too narrowly, while Kathedersocialismus suggests excessive radicalism. Cauwès opposes the demand for absolute individual economic freedom and advocates greater state intervention, explicitly aligning himself with Carey against the English school. Yet his interventionism remains selective: he supports limits on working hours and interest rates and restrictions on banking and stock-exchange activity, while rejecting compulsory workers’ insurance, a legal entitlement to poor relief, and encroachments on landed property or inheritance.
Mit der Grundauffassung hat der Verfasser auch die traditionelle Systematik der klassischen Schule aufgegeben.
English translation: Along with the fundamental conception, the author has also abandoned the traditional systematic arrangement of the classical school.
The connection between intellectual orientation and arrangement gives the review its next concern. Cauwès replaces the traditional sequence of production, distribution, and consumption with three divisions: general political economy; industrial and social economy; and public economy, whose second-edition treatment was still outstanding. These range from economic society and basic concepts through production, population, exchange, international trade, and distribution to public works and finance. Böhm-Bawerk’s objection concerns the order of explanation: state intervention is judged before the reader has learned basic economic concepts, and an extensive price theory precedes the treatment of exchange. The new arrangement thus produces premature arguments and unnecessary repetition.
Die Hauptvorzüge des jedenfalls sehr schätzenswerthen Buches liegen wohl im Detail.
English translation: The chief merits of this book, which is in any case highly estimable, probably lie in its details.
This judgment shifts attention from architecture to execution. Böhm-Bawerk praises Cauwès’s conscientious scholarship, command of the literature, and unusually comprehensive presentation of questions and competing arguments. His fairness and moderation make him a respectable opponent even for readers who reject his conclusions. The comparison with Rau identifies the achievement as one of informed exposition and judicious practical assessment.
In viel geringerem Grade kann man unserem Autor die Vorzüge der Originalität und theoretischen Schärfe nachrühmen.
English translation: To a far lesser degree can one credit our author with the merits of originality and theoretical acuity.
The distinction between thorough exposition and theoretical advance governs the critical assessment. Cauwès is strongest at presenting and evaluating existing knowledge, not at producing new research; readers familiar with recent German economics will find little novelty in his criticism of the English school. Böhm-Bawerk particularly faults the handling of fundamental concepts and the theories of value and price, where he finds superficial views resembling those of Carey and Bastiat. He also resists Cauwès’s treatment of Malthus and Ricardo: their errors do not justify dismissing thinkers of the first rank so readily. Carey’s polemical influence appears here to compromise the composure otherwise characteristic of the textbook.
Der buchhändlerische Erfolg des Buches hat eine symptomatische Bedeutung.
English translation: The book's success in the book trade has a symptomatic significance.
The conclusion separates scientific progress from intellectual influence. Cauwès has not substantially advanced economics as a whole, but he has enriched French literature with a capable, conscientious textbook and strengthened the position of the “organic” tendency. Its rapid arrival at a second edition suggests that an anti-individualist system was finding a receptive public in a country previously regarded as a stronghold of liberal economics. The review’s significance lies in this double assessment: Böhm-Bawerk recognizes the scholarly and political importance of a moderate interventionist synthesis while withholding endorsement of its conceptual foundations.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian