Karlheinz Muhr Library

The Complete “Austrian School of Economics” Collection


© 2026 Karlheinz Muhr Library·Conceptualized, designed & built bykrin.ai↗
Karlheinz Muhr Library
ArchiveTimelineLibrarian
Sign in
Archive/Eugen Peter Schwiedland
[Rezension zu Aurel Kolnai: Psychoanalyse und Soziologie. Zur Psychologie von Masse und Gesellschaft]

Eugen Peter Schwiedland · 1921

[Rezension zu Aurel Kolnai: Psychoanalyse und Soziologie. Zur Psychologie von Masse und Gesellschaft]

1 sections
Ask about this book

About this work

Eugen Peter Schwiedland: Review of Aurel Kolnai’s Psychoanalyse und Soziologie (1921)

Schwiedland’s brief review of Kolnai’s 1920 book assesses the promise and limitations of applying psychoanalysis to social inquiry. He identifies its central question as whether returning to the origins of psychic life can advance the study of society. His account moves immediately from this methodological ambition to skepticism about its conceptual execution:

Dabei werden fantastische Begriffsverbindungen verfolgt, so zwischen Wahngebilden und philosophischen Systemen.

English translation: In doing so, fantastic conceptual connections are pursued, such as that between delusional formations and philosophical systems.

The connection between delusional formations and philosophical systems is his sole concrete example. Calling such connections “fantastische” signals doubt about their explanatory value, but the review does not develop a detailed rebuttal.

Schwiedland distinguishes fluent exposition from accessibility beyond a specialist school:

Trotz ihrer fließenden Darstellung dürfte die Schrift, schon infolge der weitreichenden Anwendung der besondern psychoanalytischen Terminologie, außerhalb der Freudschen Schule kaum erheblichen Einfluß üben.

English translation: Despite its fluent exposition, the work is unlikely, already in consequence of the far-reaching application of the special psychoanalytic terminology, to exert any considerable influence outside the Freudian school.

His forecast of limited influence rests particularly on Kolnai’s extensive use of psychoanalytic terminology. The concluding request for a summary of the purported findings and a table of contents reinforces this concern with usability while retaining doubt about the results themselves. The review’s significance lies in this compact conjunction of conceptual skepticism and attention to the barriers facing psychoanalysis as it enters social inquiry.

Sections

This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.

  1. 1Review of Aurel Kolnai’s Psychoanalysis and Sociology▾

Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.

Ask the Librarian