Lederer’s short review examines a handbook intended to support the social education of civil servants through their associations. Produced from courses held at the Volksverein’s central office in 1910 and 1911, the handbook registers the growing political attention attracted by organized civil servants. Lederer presents its educational scope before identifying its governing compromise: recognition of civil servants’ rights remains bounded by loyalty to the state and a social outlook close to that of the Mittelstand.
The handbook moves from the history of the German civil service and elementary economics to civil servants’ economic position, social problems, and legal status. Its attempt to mediate between left and right begins with its account of the employment relationship:
Die Stellung des Beamten zum Staat wird zu definieren gesucht als teilweise staatsrechtliche teilweise privatvertragliche, wie die Schrift überhaupt zwischen den extremen Auffassungen von links und rechts zu vermitteln sucht.
English translation: The position of the official in relation to the state is sought to be defined as partly one of public law and partly one of private contract, just as the work in general seeks to mediate between the extreme conceptions of the left and of the right.
This mixed conception accommodates both the privileges of public office and demands for reform: civil-service committees, safeguards for freedom of association, political activity and expression, and changes to disciplinary procedures. Yet the handbook’s treatment of party politics reveals the limits of that accommodation:
Hier tritt die Schrift dafür ein, daß der Beamte, auch in geheimer Wahl (schon auf Grund seines Dienstes), seine Stimme nicht für eine staatsfeindliche Partei, also insbesondere nicht für Vertreter des radikalen Polentums und der Sozialdemokratie abgeben dürfe.
English translation: Here the work advocates that the official, even in a secret ballot (already on the ground of his service), may not cast his vote for a party hostile to the state, thus in particular not for representatives of radical Polish nationalism and of Social Democracy.
Lederer reports this restriction as the handbook’s position. It permits civil servants to join an opposition party within the accepted political order, but extends official obligations even into the secret ballot. Political freedom thus depends on a prior distinction between legitimate opposition and parties classified as hostile to the state.
The review then follows the handbook into professional organization and economic self-help. Warnings against clandestine trading, installment purchases, department stores, and special discounts for officials disclose an affinity with the interests of small independent producers and traders. The same orientation supports housing cooperatives while treating consumer cooperatives with suspicion: civil servants are expected to uphold the state’s effort to preserve independent livelihoods.
Lederer’s concluding assessment locates these proposals within the social tendency of the Centre Party. Alongside sections on social training, civic education, and social work, they seek reconciliation between civil servants and other classes. His final sentence makes the distance between that conciliatory programme and its prospective constituency decisive:
Die Wege welche hiefür vorgeschlagen werden, dürften allerdings kaum den Beifall der großen Massen der radikaler orientierten Beamenschaft finden.
English translation: The ways which are proposed for this purpose, however, will hardly find the approval of the great mass of the more radically oriented body of officials.
The review’s significance lies in this tension: a programme that acknowledges collective rights and social reform nevertheless binds them to political loyalty and Mittelstand priorities, limiting its appeal among more radical civil servants.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian