Eugen Peter Schwiedland · Year unverified
Schwiedland’s March 1921 review welcomes W. Koppers’s study as an ethnological contribution to questions he had addressed in his own Political Economy: the origins and primitive forms of economic life. Its central claim concerns the authority of historical evidence in explaining early society.
This new, positive, historically-descriptive method differs profoundly from that of the philosophical sociologists, whose imagination played far too large a part in their work.
The contrast supplies the review’s evaluative framework. Schwiedland presents Koppers’s seven lectures as a concise synthesis of recent ethnology, associated with Ratzel, Frobenius, Graebner, Ankermann, Foy and W. Schmidt. Their scope extends from economics and property to families, states, religion, morality, and personal and material culture. Economic origins thus belong within a broader inquiry into human communal life.
This treatise contains, besides theoretic truths of considerable importance, statements of hard fact and information of the highest practical value.
This closing endorsement joins theoretical significance to factual and practical usefulness. The brief review offers no detailed examples or objections; its relevance lies in Schwiedland’s explicit preference for historically descriptive ethnology over speculative sociology as a foundation for studying early institutions.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian