Emil Lederer · 1911
Emil Lederer’s brief review assesses the Hungarian statistical yearbook for 1908, published in German translation in 1910, through its coverage and usability for foreign readers. It moves from a survey of distinctive statistical material to criticism of missing detail and insufficient institutional explanation. Its central concern is that extensive data require contextual guidance to become useful across national boundaries.
Lederer places the yearbook alongside its German and Austrian counterparts, then singles out subjects of particular interest: nationality, emigration and return migration, agricultural prices, pupils’ national affiliations, newspapers, libraries, museums, and public administration and finance. Cultural statistics receive a pointed economic reading: the financial results of art exhibitions disclose fluctuations in the business cycle. These distinctive materials supplement the expected statistical coverage:
Man findet aber außerdem noch all die Tabellen, die man sonst in den statistischen Jahrbüchern zu suchen gewohnt ist.
English translation: Besides this, however, one finds all the tables that one is otherwise accustomed to look for in statistical yearbooks.
The review’s emphasis then shifts from comprehensiveness to interpretability. Lederer misses a more detailed treatment of taxation beyond the budget figures. More broadly, he argues that foreign readers need explanations of specifically Hungarian arrangements. Judicial and administrative statistics presuppose knowledge of the institutions being counted; brief accounts of relevant legal provisions would make the figures intelligible. The statistical yearbook of Vienna supplies his practical benchmark for such explanatory support.
His final criticism applies the same usability criterion to place names. He asks for familiar German names, at least in an appendix if considerations of national honour preclude their use in the main text:
Denn es ist zu bezweifeln, daß viele Leser wissen, was mit Brassó (Kronstadt) und Pécs (Fünfkirchen) gemeint ist.
English translation: For it is to be doubted that many readers know what is meant by Brassó (Kronstadt) and Pécs (Fünfkirchen).
This ending exposes the tension between national presentation and the needs of the German-language edition’s intended audience. Lederer’s appraisal is valuable as a compact statement of what makes official statistics accessible: breadth of enumeration matters, but so do institutional explanation and recognizable terminology. His proposed improvements concern the practical conditions under which readers can turn tables into knowledge.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian