Emil Lederer · 1914
Lederer’s brief review of Leo Müffelmann’s book credits its account of the middle-class movement’s principal tendencies but questions its explanatory framework. He traces the book’s progression from the movement’s nature and historical significance through crafts, small retail, agriculture, and the “new middle class,” concluding with political parties and the movement’s future.
The decisive criticism concerns the separation of these subjects from economic development and society’s class structure. For Lederer, accessibility requires contextual explanation, not an isolated survey:
Gerade in einer für weiteste Kreise bestimmten Darstellung wäre es wohl wichtig, sich nicht streng auf die isolierte Behandlung des Problems zu beschränken, sondern seine Bedeutung durch die Einstellung in die realen Zusammenhänge klarzustellen.
English translation: Precisely in an account intended for the widest circles it would surely be important not to confine oneself strictly to an isolated treatment of the problem, but rather to make its significance clear by placing it within the real connections.
This methodological objection gives the review its wider significance: the middle-class movement must be understood relationally, through its place in economic and social change. Lederer closes by identifying what such contextualization would make intelligible:
Nur so könnte auch die Wandlung herausgearbeitet werden, welche der Sinn der Mittelstandsbewegung im Rahmen der staatlichen Sozialpolitik erfahren hat.
English translation: Only in this way could the transformation also be brought out which the meaning of the Mittelstand movement has undergone within the framework of state social policy.
The review thus distinguishes descriptive coverage from historical explanation. It calls for an account of the movement’s changing meaning within state social policy, without itself supplying that account.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian