Eugen Peter Schwiedland · 1921
Schwiedland’s brief review grounds Askwith’s authority in his official experience of industrial conciliation and arbitration. It traces the book from vocational choice, prospects, and training to twenty-five years of British industrial labor relations, emphasizing its informed treatment of wartime conditions.
The central issue is Askwith’s preference for developing durable conciliation and arbitration institutions over politically expedient settlements under Lloyd George. Schwiedland identifies the legal aspiration behind this position:
Er erwartet offenbar von einer stetigen und konkreten Rechtsbildung auf diesem Gebiete viel.
English translation: He evidently expects much from a steady and concrete formation of law in this field.
His concluding reservation shifts attention from institutional design to the social authority needed to sustain it:
Es fragt sich nur, ob die Gewerkvereinsorganisation in England weiterhin ihren Einfluß auf die Arbeitermassen behält, denn mit dem Aufkommen syndikalistischer oder gildensozialistischer Strömungen wird auch jenes System in Frage gestellt.
English translation: The only question is whether the trade-union organization in England will continue to retain its influence over the masses of workers, for with the rise of syndicalist or guild-socialist currents that system too is called into question.
The review thus makes a conditional assessment: gradual legal development promises stability, but its effectiveness depends on unions retaining influence over workers. Its significance lies in locating the limits of industrial arbitration in competing forms of labor organization and allegiance.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian