Emil Lederer · 1919
Emil Lederer’s short review of the third and fourth revised editions of Neurath’s lecture moves from an account of comprehensive economic planning to a critique of its coercive, ethical, and calculative premises. Neurath proposes full socialization through universal statistics, an economic plan, and a central economic office. Statistics would inventory resources, production, and productive possibilities in physical rather than monetary terms, including qualitative differences. The supreme political and economic authority would select the plan; existing organizations, including cartels and cooperatives, would execute it without wholesale nationalization.
Lederer’s first objection concerns the gap between statistical knowledge and implementation:
Der hier entwickelte Plan würde entweder, konsequent durchgeführt, einen bis ins einzelne gehenden Zwang, eine sehr gesteigerte bureaukratische Organisation erfordern, oder: auf dem Papier bleiben als Statistik.
English translation: The plan developed here would either, if consistently carried out, require a coercion extending into every detail, a greatly intensified bureaucratic organization, or else: remain on paper as statistics.
This dilemma leads to a deeper objection that remains even if coercion could be avoided. Neurath’s central authority would determine not merely production but the binding ensemble of satisfactions—the “Sensationengesamtheit”—instead of leaving that choice to consumers. For Lederer, this extends socialization beyond the reorganization of production into the administrative determination of human wants. He interprets it as a continuation of war economy, in which people are maintained for an external purpose rather than economic arrangements serving their lives.
Die Idee des Sozialismus, noch so rationalistisch gedacht, wird nie den Organisationsgedanken, wie hier geschehen, zum Selbstzweck erheben.
English translation: The idea of socialism, however rationalistically conceived, will never raise the notion of organization, as has been done here, to an end in itself.
This sentence supplies the review’s normative center: rational organization is a means, not socialism’s final purpose. Lederer closes with a distinct economic objection, asserting that rational calculation in a natural economy requires quantification and therefore money, whether gold or labor money. He presents this as evident to theoretically informed readers rather than developing a proof. The review’s significance lies in connecting a practical criticism of centralized enforcement with a defense of consumer choice and a warning against making wartime administrative techniques the model for socialism.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian