Lederer’s review essay examines Gustav Cassel’s Das Geldproblem der Welt, based on his memorandum to the League of Nations. Its governing question is whether monetary stabilization can succeed without restoring production and recognizing the social relations that constrain economic policy. Lederer accepts much of Cassel’s diagnosis but challenges remedies that separate monetary equilibrium from the conditions of reconstruction.
Die gewaltigen Erschütterungen der Geldsysteme aller kriegführenden Staaten durch den Krieg sind nur die Reversseite der wirtschaftlichen Katastrophe, die der Krieg darstellte.
English translation: The tremendous convulsions of the monetary systems of all the belligerent states brought about by the war are only the reverse side of the economic catastrophe which the war constituted.
Monetary disorder expresses wartime economic destruction, rather than an independently curable banking malfunction. Lederer initially finds Cassel’s approach compatible with this premise. Purchasing power created without corresponding real savings raises prices, whether issued through banknotes or government borrowing. Even taxation can indirectly encourage inflation if it exhausts savings without reducing consumption, forcing enterprises to seek bank credit.
Demgemäß bleiben als einzige Mittel zur Sanierung der Verhältnisse: Einschränkung der Staatsausgaben oder Einschränkung des Privatverbrauchs.
English translation: Accordingly there remain as the only means of restoring sound conditions: restriction of state expenditure or restriction of private consumption.
This formulation identifies the restrictive consequences of Cassel’s framework. If public expenditure cannot be sufficiently reduced and private consumption cannot be restrained, stabilization appears unattainable. The disagreement sharpens over the discount rate.
Sehr große Bedeutung legt infolgedessen Cassel der Frage des Bankdiskonts bei, offenbar aus der Erwägung, daß dieser, stärker und schmiegsamer als die Steuerschraube, eine Rationalisierung der Produktion und eine Einschränkung des Verbrauchs erzwingt.
English translation: Cassel consequently attaches very great importance to the question of the bank discount rate, evidently on the consideration that this, more powerfully and more pliantly than the tax screw, enforces a rationalization of production and a restriction of consumption.
Lederer questions whether higher interest can accomplish this adjustment without destroying existing production and obstructing replacement activity. The proposed mechanism depends on unemployment lowering wages and restoring profits, but that sequence cannot be isolated from political resistance and obligations to support the unemployed. Social power and moral demands belong within economic explanation: unemployment relief reflects actual political conditions, while its abolition could provoke upheavals costing more than the anticipated savings.
Lederer accepts the need to align state revenue and expenditure, especially through reduced armaments, while rejecting an unconditional demand for immediate budgetary balance. Liberal prescriptions assume unrestricted competition and the dominance of economic calculation—conditions neither present nor readily achievable. His objection concerns the treatment of fiscal discipline as socially unconditioned.
Against an exclusive emphasis on contraction, Lederer stresses recovery. Increased production could reconcile output and consumption without radical consumption cuts. Cassel underestimates this possibility by approaching reconstruction as though it were the incremental expansion of an already developed economy. Reopening trade and restoring damaged productive capacities can proceed faster than ordinary prewar growth.
Lederer nevertheless agrees with Cassel’s rejection of deflation. Stabilizing money differs from restoring its former purchasing power: appreciation would burden production and require debts contracted in depreciated currency to be repaid in more valuable money. Stable exchange rates instead presuppose stable domestic purchasing power. Lederer emphasizes both a balance between production and consumption and the binding of currency held abroad through a long-term loan, preventing speculative holdings from flooding the market.
International credit can bridge the transition, but cannot create real resources merely by mobilizing accumulated wealth. Lending countries must supply goods otherwise available for their own consumption or investment. Likewise, a banking consortium supporting an exchange rate effectively lends the value of the currency it absorbs. Here Lederer preserves Cassel’s insistence on the material foundations of monetary repair.
The discussion of gold extends this international argument. Lederer supports preventing renewed gold appreciation but regards Cassel’s fear of future scarcity as excessive, given possibilities for monetary creation and international arrangements. He also endorses reopened trade routes and reconstructed economic regions, while emphasizing the vested interests obstructing these measures.
The conclusion qualifies the earlier confidence in expanding output. Recovery in Germany and Austria has challenged pessimism about productive regeneration, yet its conjunction with currency disorder has generated new international difficulties. The decisive problem increasingly concerns markets and the proportionate coordination of production, rather than productive capacity alone. Neither monetary discipline nor increased output is independently sufficient: Cassel’s proposals remain valuable where practicable, but their adequacy depends on changing economic conditions and the social relations through which stabilization must occur.
This work was divided into 1 sections when it entered the library's research corpus—an apparatus for search and citation, not necessarily the author's own table of contents. Each title opens its summary.
Put a question to this work; the Librarian answers from its 1 sections and cites the passage.
Ask the Librarian