3,015 works, 150 years of economic thought. Each one summarized and searchable, with cited passages inside.
How can practitioners find their way through four major laws, five implementing regulations and hundreds of administrative circulars? In this brief 1937 review of Alfred Etscheit, Alexander Etscheit and Otto Böhmer’s Handbuch des Devisenrechts, Helene Lieser judges the handbook by its usefulness in navigating German foreign-exchange law. She singles out its organization by factual situations, supported by an introduction that directs readers to the relevant provisions. Her concern is practical access rather than the merits of exchange controls: even practitioners abroad, she observes, benefit from these coordinated finding aids. The review offers a compact example of legal criticism attentive to how readers actually consult a reference work.
In two sentences, Helene Lieser’s 1937 review places a colonial source collection’s political purpose beside a brief favourable appraisal. She quotes Ernst Gerhard Jacob’s declared aim of equipping speakers, youth leaders and political instructors to demand the restoration of German colonial possessions, then notes its wealth of interesting material. The revealing contrast is between that mobilizing rhetoric, which casts colonial loss as an affront to national honour, and Lieser’s narrowly informational judgement. This short notice lets readers examine that juxtaposition without mistaking it for a developed argument about colonial policy or a critical assessment of Jacob’s sources.
What makes a legal compilation useful? In this brief 1937 review of Erich Bohley and Hermann Krutsch’s Das Sparkassenrecht in Bayern, Helene Lieser values the consolidation of scattered legal sources rather than a novel interpretation. She singles out its inclusion of previously unpublished implementation decisions alongside Reich and state provisions, and notes its treatment of national banking legislation’s effects on savings banks. Her concise verdict identifies the practical basis for her praise: making Bavarian savings-bank law accessible as a coherent overview.
What makes a legal handbook useful to laypeople as well as lawyers? In this brief 1937 review, Helene Lieser commends Franz Bachmayer’s guide to the judicial invalidation of documents under Austrian law for combining statutory provisions and highest-court decisions with an intelligible account of procedure. Her concise assessment identifies a practical standard for legal exposition: authoritative material must be accompanied by a clear explanation of how proceedings unfold.
What makes a difficult banking law usable, especially for a foreign reader? In this brief 1937 review, Helene Lieser praises Hans Pröhl’s commentary for combining clear explanation with the documents needed to interpret the statute, including reporting guidelines and agreements on maximum deposit interest rates. Her assessment offers a precise distinction: she commends the commentary’s practical aids to understanding, not the law’s economic purposes or effects.
Updating French cheque law did not mean updating every part of a banking treatise. In this brief 1937 review, Helene Lieser precisely marks the scope of Joseph Hamel’s supplement: it presents changes to French law, now based on the Geneva Conventions of 1931, while leaving revision of the international cheque-law section to a further edition. Her notice offers a useful distinction between what the supplement supplies and what remains outstanding, rather than an assessment of Hamel’s legal interpretations.
Clarity and ease of consultation are Helene Lieser’s criteria in this brief 1937 review of the first volume of Otto Wittschieben’s introduction to Austrian financial law. She recommends a guide intended for students also to practitioners without specialist tax expertise. Her notice draws attention to the volume’s institutional scope: budgets, financial administration and public debt precede the systematic treatment of tax legislation reserved for volume two. It offers a compact assessment of whom the book serves and why its organization matters.
What makes a statutory text usable without commentary? In this brief 1937 review, Helene Lieser credits the Beck edition of the Stock Corporation Act with providing practical alternatives: an official explanatory statement, a subject index, and skillfully placed cross-references. Her compact judgement distinguishes editorial assistance from legal commentary, showing what she values in a reference edition without offering a substantive assessment of the law itself.
How must a legally prescribed “workplace community” be adapted to commercial credit cooperatives? Helene Lieser’s brief 1937 review identifies this as the subject of E. H. Meyer’s study and commends his account as clear and interesting. The notice records her favorable assessment of a specific encounter between labour law and cooperative organization, without detailing Meyer’s proposals or offering an independent argument.
How can a nonspecialist find a way through German foreign-exchange law? In this brief 1937 review of Kurt Urbanek’s Die Devisengesetzgebung, Helene Lieser singles out the practical value of grouping and numbering difficult legal material. Her praise concerns a compact, inexpensive guide to legislation and its implementation, not the merits of exchange controls themselves. The notice offers a precise glimpse of her criteria for useful legal exposition: affordability, economy and navigability.
Helene Lieser’s brief review of Robert Lisnik’s Das neue Depot-Gesetz judges the guide by its usefulness to readers facing a change in German securities-custody law. She singles out the introduction’s clear account of the new provisions, alongside annotations and a subject index. The review offers a compact example of her practical reviewing criteria: clarity about legislative change and ease of reference, rather than an assessment of the law’s merits.
Fewer corporate groups need not make consolidated accounts a less pressing question. That distinction anchors Helene Lieser’s brief 1938 review of Artur Wisswedel’s Konzern und Konzernsteuerrecht. She welcomes its compact, orderly treatment of consolidated balance sheets despite what she describes as a tendency toward reduced group formation or dissolution. Her notice records a precise evaluative priority—clarity on a still-current accounting question—rather than assessing Wisswedel’s specific legal arguments.